Skip to comments.Trayvon Martin Shooting “DeeDee” Reveals The False “Truths”[Martin lawyers lying about girlfriend]
Posted on 04/21/2012 6:10:36 AM PDT by kevcol
A couple of things are certain:
DeeDee and Trayvon did not talk for 400 minutes on 2/26 the day he was shot.
DeeDee did not go to the hospital on 3/2 and 3/3 and that was NOT the reason for not attending the viewing or memorial.
DeeDee and Trayvon were not Boyfriend/Girlfriend. They were close, platonic best friends.
DeeDee was not devastated, destroyed, or an emotional wreck. She was sad that her best friend was shot. She notified others, including her cousin who is also a prolific tweeter, but did not know immediately who Trayvon was.
DeeDee did not miss school.
DeeDee did not contact anyone because there was no reason to.
Did DeeDee actually hear anything that night? Who knows. However, the mere fact that Benjamin Crump can be proven to have falsely constructed more than 80% of his press conference in order to plant false misleading misinformation in the media sure brings the entire narrative into question.
The reason the prosecutor Angela Corey didnt go to the Grand Jury was because she would have either had to introduce DeeDees testimony, or avoid it completely. If she included the lies and the manipulations DeeDee would have been forced to bear witness at trial and OMara would be able to pull the lies out. That is why no Grand Jury was used. They wanted the media evidence of DeeDee to exist, but not the legal evidence,
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
I disagree. I think Zimmerman will be acquitted and everyone involved in this case knows it. They are simply trying to string out the case until the political content evaporates and then they will drop charges at 11:59 PM on a Friday night.
Most likely scenario is that the investigation will be strung out into 2013 and then simply dropped. Perhaps as people are watching a hurricane come in.
The politicians who have been hyping this case have suddenly become very quiet and I think they have been told that this dog will not hunt.
“2. If the powder traces show that the muzzle blast was very close, Martin was on top of him.”
The judge asked the investigator yesterday, the distance of the shot and he said ‘very close proximity’, gun powder residue on the sweatshirt.
>Heres the thing: These will be riots that that non-rioters will be expecting and prepared for.
I do hope that it will be legal to double tap any rioters that threaten any innocents. A shoot on sight against looters
would also be a good teaching opportunity.
By the time this is done the Martin family’s lawyer should be sitting in jail and George Zimmerman should be a rich man.
If it goes to trial, and Zimmerman is acquitted, then perhaps. But if the charges are dropped, Florida law grants him immunity.
The article refers to getting him arrested as "first base" for Crump. It establishes probable cause, enabling lawsuits. "Second base" is the hearing on whether the case should go forward. If Zimmerman wins that, Crump loses.
I'm not sure the account I am looking at is DeeDee, but it comes much closer to a match than the one Conservative Treehouse has adopted.
I read an account that there is gunpowder residue on Zimmerman’s clothing too.
No, that was another fabrication from ABC. If you read the whole blog page that’s the source for this post you’ll see that ABC is in deep, deep doo-doo.
Somebody should do a voice analysis of the ABC “interview” with “Dee Dee”, to see if the voice before the break to the ABC reporter is the same voice as the one after the break (the voice which claims she heard the confrontation).
And somebody should check out what ABC has to say about the 911 call from Trayvon’s phone on March 2nd when Martin was dead but 16 days before Trayvon’s dad says he was able to get into TRayvon’s phone.
I’d also like to know why Trayvon’s dad had TRayvon’s phone if it was on TRayvon’s person when he died. Whether it was found by the police or by the coroner, I would have thought it would be submitted as evidence in the case.
Way, way too many discrepancies, and it sure seems like ABC is in the middle of them all. I wonder if even one percent of what ABC has presented is actually genuine.
At the beginning of the article, the author recommends reading updates 9 and 10-pt1. It really is essential to understanding the whole story.
I read either today or yesterday (sorry I don’t have source) that gunpowder burns were visible on Martin’s sweatshirt/hoodie whatever it’s called.
I’ve been reading on FR and another site.
If I can find the source I’ll post it to you.
If you read everything on that blog page it makes sense that the whole thing was a financial scam from the very beginning, although the financial aspect of it most likely came from the 2 filthy attorneys for the Martin family. Seems like maybe they have a history of this kind of scam.
Hopefully by the end of all this they will be sitting in jail...
Thing is, it sure looks like the prosecution is playing along with their financial scheme. The blog author points out that the affidavit of probable cause only cites the “friend” as saying that Trayvon said he was being followed - which is the only part from ABC’s “interview” which was in a girl’s voice, according to the blog author. If there really were 2 different voices in that interview and Crump and ABC conspired to make it appear that all of it was from the girl, it also looks like the prosecutor knew not to include in the affidavit the other stuff that was really from the other voice.
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
“why didnt the kid call ANYONE??? Bogus.”
Why ask me? I don’t know! 8^)
SHe must be a crack ho or something, because how can these people pull so many lawyers and resources out of their hat like this, in support of the prosecution, is unbelievable.
I go see lawyers for my personal business and they drag feet, they never like my views and they constantly betray me and refuse my proposals for getting additional funds.
So, this is manipulated horse crap from day 1.
Given the liberalness of Romney and the Zimmerman case, I see a plot whereby the GOP-E is going to be ambushed.
Romney is going to be portrayed as pro-slavery white GOP conservative CEO, while anybody with a gun will be attacked by Romney in order to placate the perception that whoever has a gun in self defense must be a white retard of embarassment.
Romney is going to be a disaster. This is all being shaped to be that even if a black kills in self defense another black, Romney and the liberals will be placated into calling the one with the gun as white racist.
And this is the same people who want to keep disarmed black people on a plantation treatment who will call us racist and having caused slavery.
This is a really sick convoluted rhetoric, but it is amazing no one has yet caught on it.
Given how antigun Romney has been, I frankly do not think he will win, because liberals will keep screaming to unions that he is antigun and they will scream to jews and blacks he is an evil CEO antisemite converting jews after they die etc.. watch it.
Romney is DOA as a candidate and pretty much well planned as a Mormon to bring distate to Jews, blacks, conservatives and blue dog gun totting Union democrates who can vote Republican and display pride on 911 commemoratives. Watch it.
911 is being forgotten over all this crap to the benefit of the terrorist in office.
Something I just realized. Didn’t the prosecutor admit yesterday that they have no evidence to support the claim that Zimmerman confronted Martin? If so, then they are specifically NOT using what was in the latter part of the Dee-Dee “interview” where it was claimed that Trayvon had apparently been pushed.
If that was really part of the interview with the girl, then why would they not use that, just like they used her claims about Trayvon being scared?
What I don’t understand is how the prosecutors - who are supposed to tell the WHOLE truth and disclose any evidence that refutes their claims - can get away with not saying that the 911 caller said it was Zimmerman calling for help, or a myriad of other pieces of evidence that strongly refute the claims in that probable cause affidavit.
This whole thing just really, REALLY stinks.
I know the MSM claims she has a story, but the point was the defense only gets to confront what they say in the trial not in the grand jury. Even if it’s in the grand jury testimony it can’t be brought up unless the person is called at the trial and then it’s tough for the defense to get it see: State v. Jose Alfaro: Obtaining Secret Grand Jury Testimony
I agree with you, but I would further define “black culture” to be “black trash culture”. There are trash cultures in every race. Of course it is not racist to recognize the trashy elements of any race. To do otherwise would be to walk around with blinders on and get yourself into trouble.
People need to know this is what it’s all really about, for the lawyers and possibly the Martin family. I had no idea that an arrest is the start of the civil lawsuits. That makes the standards for probable cause CRITICAL for the government to protect individuals from legal financial harassment.
Which is important also because the Islamists intend to break our wills by financially harassing people through the courts. So the standards of evidence for probable cause MUST be upheld.
My theory on that is that the 911 call is the Sanford Police calling themselves in order to discover the phone's number. If the phone was passworded, the police would not have been able to examine its directory entries and logs without first breaking the password. However, passworded phones can be used to call 911 without entering the password. If I'm correct, it's odd that it took them until 2 March to get around to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.