Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yep, Itís Official: Elizabeth Warren Did Not Pay Voluntary Higher Tax Rate in MA (It Figures)
Townhall.com ^ | April 21, 2012 | Daniel Doherty

Posted on 04/21/2012 8:15:11 PM PDT by Kaslin

Earlier this week Elizabeth Warren was asked by the Boston Globe a seemingly simple and straightforward question about her taxes: In 2011, did she pay the 5.85% rate (which is voluntary) on her Massachusetts state tax form? Since 2001, as I explained in a previous post, residents of the Commonwealth have had the option – if they so choose – to pay a higher tax rate than the 5.3% minimum. And since the former consumer advocate raked in more than $700,000 last year, the Globe believed their inquiry was an appropriate and reasonable one. At the time, however, she refused to answer the question and though I was quick to criticize her silence, I acknowledged that it was still possible she paid the top rate. Unsurprisingly – according to the Brown campaign – it’s clear she did not.

After avoiding the question all week, Elizabeth Warren finally confirmed today that she did not pay the higher 5.85% rate on her state tax form, a legal option available for Massachusetts taxpayers who believe they should pay more.

For the last few weeks, Warren has lectured others about their moral responsibility to pay higher taxes. In 2011, Warren earned more than $716,000, and has a net worth of as much as $14.5 million.

“The problem with running a campaign based on self-righteousness and moral superiority is that you had better live up to the same standard you would impose on everyone else,” said Jim Barnett, Campaign Manager for Scott Brown. “Millionaire Warren lectures others about their obligation and responsibility to pay higher taxes, but she refuses to pay the optional higher rate available in Massachusetts. This is the sort of hypocrisy and double-speak voters are sick and tired of hearing from politicians, especially those who can’t keep their hands out of others’ pocketbooks.”

To be sure, I’ve written a number of posts on Elizabeth Warren’s hypocrisy and duplicity before, but this is almost too good to be true. In short, her innocuous decision to pay a lower tax rate in Massachusetts – when she had the option to pay a higher one -- seems to vindicate my longstanding belief that all people (even liberal Harvard professors), want to keep a larger percentage of their annual income.

More importantly, what makes these startling revelations particularly painful for Democrats is that Elizabeth Warren has been on the campaign trail for months demonizing the wealthy (“there is nobody in this country who got rich on their own,” she once said) and castigating top income earners. In other words, how are Massachusetts voters, in the last analysis, supposed to take a Senate candidate seriously when she clearly doesn’t practice what she preaches? At a time when Americans are growing increasingly tired of the partisan gridlock in Washington, why on earth would we want to replace one of the most moderate, bipartisan lawmakers in the Senate with a shameless demagogue? Of course, virtually every poll in America shows the warring candidates locked in a dead heat. And it’s certainly possible that Scott Brown might lose his reelection campaign. Still, as voters become more familiar with Elizabeth Warren’s hypocrisy, I’m confident they’ll be less inclined to vote for her in November.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: classwarfare; elizabethwarren; hypocrisy; liberalhypocrisy; occupy; onepercent; scottbrown; taxes; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Kaslin
“The problem with running a campaign based on self-righteousness and moral superiority is that you had better live up to the same standard you would impose on everyone else,”

Reminds me of the old joke:

Communist organizing rally...question from the floor, "Comrade! If you had $1,000,000 you would share it equally with us?
Speaker, "Of course, Comrade!"
"Comrade Speaker, if you had $100,000, you would share it equally with us?"

"YES, Comrade! Of course I would!"

...

"Comrade Speaker, if you had $100, would you share it equally with us?"
"Of course NOT, Comrade!"
"Why not, Comrade Speaker?"
"Because I HAVE $100!"

21 posted on 04/22/2012 1:05:26 AM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Taxes are for the proles.

Inner Party members are above it all.


22 posted on 04/22/2012 2:00:51 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Do as I say not as I do. Commie bastard alert


23 posted on 04/22/2012 3:59:10 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (B B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Of course not. Buffet and all these billionaires could send the government nice checks but they don’t. It’s all talk and getting their 15 minutes extended.


24 posted on 04/22/2012 4:22:46 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It figures indeed.The only thing these scum love more than spending our money is holding onto their own.


25 posted on 04/22/2012 4:26:12 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

I think that is an excellent idea

I would hope President Romney would direct the IRS to add voluntary 30%, 40% and 60% tax payment rates on every 1040.

And no one is allowed to use one federal taxpayer dollar campaigning on the issue of paying higher taxes unless they can prove they themselves pay it.


26 posted on 04/22/2012 5:10:24 AM PDT by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“Commie bastard alert.”

You forgot adolescent and psychotic to go along with
Commie bastard. (plus a few others.)

IMHO

Regards.


27 posted on 04/22/2012 5:13:17 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

AFAIC enemies of our constitution who are actively committed to destroying our country, get zip.


28 posted on 04/22/2012 5:27:43 AM PDT by AnTiw1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

He still makes my skin crawl:
http://www.therightperspective.org/2011/01/03/scott-brown-invites-gay-activist-to-dadt-repeal-ceremony/


29 posted on 04/22/2012 6:59:45 PM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson