Skip to comments.A Hard Look at the President
Posted on 04/22/2012 7:43:40 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
... Eight years ago, The Times offered comparably scant campaign coverage of the incumbent, George W. Bush, even as it blanketed readers with articles about Senator John Kerry and others competing for the Democratic nomination.
Now, though, the general election season is on, and The Times needs to offer an aggressive look at the presidents record, policy promises and campaign operation to answer the question: Who is the real Barack Obama?
Many critics view The Times as constitutionally unable to address the election in an unbiased fashion. Like a lot of America, it basked a bit in the warm glow of Mr. Obamas election in 2008. The company published a book about the countrys first African-American president, Obama: The Historic Journey. The Times also published a lengthy portrait of him in its Times Topics section on NYTimes.com, yet theres nothing of the kind about George W. Bush or his father.
Readers deserve to know: Who is the real Barack Obama? And The Times needs to show that it can address the question in a hard-nosed, unbiased way.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Sure. Yeah.....and monkeys may flight out of my butt.
After three years in office, it amazes me that we have to ask “Who is the real Barack Obama?” I think the American people know who and what he is. But....those that voted for him will not admit they made one hell of a mistake. Hopefully, they will come to their senses this time around and save this country from a dictator.
“I think they [the Times reporters and editors who cover the campaign and Washington] see themselves as aggressive journalists who dont play favorites.”
If this clown thinks he’s innoculating the New York Times, he should know that his article only makes it look more ridiculous.
Dn't need n Weatherman t see which way Cmrade Chairman bama's wind
"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"
--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."
"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."
Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."
"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left. Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."
Unless they start asking questions about the birth certificate, anything the New York Times writes pretending to vet the pResident is BS.
Funny how these "aggressive journalists" forgot to cover the Arpaio investigation which determined that Obama's Internet Birth Certificate and his Selective Service Registration are FRAUDS. They presented evidence too.I post it here as I suspect that otherwise no one would ever see it.
Do Times readers know who Mara Zebest is? I sort of knew who she was even ten years ago because she co-authored a couple of the books about Photoshop that are on my shelf. She asserts without reservation that Obama's Birth Certificate is a FRAUD. (Just Google her name and Obama's together and I'm sure you will find her report that never seemed to interest the "aggressive journalists" from the Times.)
What a load of crap.
After three years in office, it amazes me that we have to ask Who is the real Barack Obama?
At least we don’t have to wonder about the New York Times, an unabashed hardcore ideological propaganda mouthpiece for the Democrat Party and purveyor of the far left liberal agenda.
“I applaud The Timess stated commitment to doing these kinds of stories. Readers deserve to know: Who is the real Barack Obama? And The Times needs to show that it can address the question in a hard-nosed, unbiased way. “
Hahahahahah. I’m sure the Simes will provide an “unbiased” look into the life and times of St. hussein.
‘Who is the real Obama?’
You don’t know the half of it.
The best Obama exposure site on the net:
The Obama File
The United States Library of Congress has selected
TheObamaFile.com for inclusion in its historic collection
of Internet materials
This is the key here. NYT readers are self selected limo libs who are not interested in learning more about The W0n.
Most non-readers already know that Hussein is a Zer0.
I just left a post over there as well that should set the leftist off.