Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Service needs more women in its ranks
Washington Post ^ | April 24, 2012 | Joe Davidson

Posted on 04/24/2012 7:55:54 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Maybe the Secret Service has too much testosterone.

Would more female agents have made the sex scandal involving special agents and Colombian prostitutes less likely?

No one can answer that with any certainty, but the scandal does raise the issue of gender diversity among those who are willing to die for the president. There is very little diversity among them — about 90 percent of Secret Service agents are men.

The probability of the scandal happening “would have been reduced significantly” if there were more women on the Cartagena detail, said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.).

Greater gender diversity can set a different tone in “recreational liberties,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.)

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2012; service
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I nominate Sandra Fluke and her oversexed Georgetown sisters for Secret Service gang bangers. They can entertain the male SS agents. In this way, there will no longer be scandals with prostitutes. Sandra Fluke (and others) get their unlimited orgasms and contraceptives free, and the male SS agents go off to work with smiles. This is a win-win for Barry if he will only take it.
51 posted on 04/25/2012 12:05:31 AM PDT by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJC1

LOL...it is a sad thing indeed when a commonsense statement like yours shines like a flashlight out of a dark night!

But that is the truth. If you aren’t professional, makes no difference if you are a glitter-bomb throwing transsexual (from another thread!) or a white male...you just aren’t professional.


52 posted on 04/25/2012 3:33:10 AM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
"...I think Obama’s SS should be all blck women. Fat ones, too. Kinda like the DMV or the TSA. Nobody will mess with them..."


53 posted on 04/25/2012 3:42:07 AM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
He continued, "With women on the detail the men would not have to pay for sex because once you combine testosterone and estrogen, nature will take it course."

Unless the women hired are primarily lesbian, in which case they will work hard to drive straight men out of the Service. What you will be left with will be a force that will be uninterested in taking a bullet to protect the persons they guard, but it will be just FABULOUS.

54 posted on 04/25/2012 3:46:59 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I just love the thought process of “man hating” women.

After all, they have unleashed the queer agenda upon us and are endangering the lives of our servicemen by placing women in combat positions and other positions requiring strength they don’t have, both physiologically or physically.


55 posted on 04/25/2012 3:52:12 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There are plenty of women in the Secret Service, the men just need to be of better CHARACTER!


56 posted on 04/25/2012 6:08:04 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

That’s probably exactly what they mean.
Fat, minority, unionized women with attitudes precluding them from working in any private sector capacity.


57 posted on 04/25/2012 6:09:43 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

You wouldn’t happen to have a gif of that rotational head thing, would you?


58 posted on 04/25/2012 6:10:07 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Bad character corrupts good morals.


59 posted on 04/25/2012 6:14:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Title should read:

SECRET SERVICE NEEDS MORE HOOKERS IN IT’S RACKS


60 posted on 04/25/2012 6:16:35 AM PDT by Lionheartusa1 (-: Socialism is the equal distribution of misery :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
What's the deal with gender and race being so important with the DEMs.
We never hear them say anything good about Men or Whites, it's always
and I mean always anti-whitey-male.

Does asking this make me racist? Of course I am according to Racist Negroes like
Lee and Co. Imagine the Repubs saying we need more Men anywhere in any job. Or even White males.

This crap will continue until these people are voted out.

61 posted on 04/25/2012 6:17:17 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
..sometimes the jokes write themselves! :-)

62 posted on 04/25/2012 6:19:27 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me $h!t, w!th d!fferent fl!e$". :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

hiring one or two “Sandra flukes” will solve the pros problem


63 posted on 04/25/2012 7:08:39 AM PDT by capt B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Hahah, no, but not having seen it, I’ll bet it is a riot.

I can just visualize it!


64 posted on 04/25/2012 9:49:32 AM PDT by rlmorel (A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
So who will they ( the powers that be ) appoint as the new Woman Secret Service teach those men a lesson Czar ? Rosie O'Donnell ?

65 posted on 04/25/2012 7:30:27 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Could this trumped up scandal be a excuse to get the public upset with the Secret Service ?


66 posted on 04/25/2012 7:35:58 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
What would be the motivation for something like this to trash the good name and reputation of the Secret Service ?
Are these Secret Service men themselves to blame for this ? or was it a set up ?
67 posted on 04/25/2012 7:43:45 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Looks like a set up.
Demonize and trash the existing Secret service.
Replace with protection service loyal to the One.

Bet it happens.
And no news coverage.

And so it goes.


68 posted on 04/25/2012 7:50:07 PM PDT by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Hillary needs a better beard than Huma’s husband.


69 posted on 04/25/2012 11:30:07 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama continued to sponsor Jeremiah Wright after he said "G.D. AMERIKKA!"Where's the outrage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident
Those who are in power, and the powers that be could or would use this as a excuse to hold Congressional Hearings and of course get the public all upset with the Secret Service.
There will be calls and a uproar to get rid of the Secret Service and replace it with some kind of Private Military Police force that won't have to be held accountable to the public or Congress.
70 posted on 04/26/2012 11:32:34 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident
Imagine if there was some part of the Secret Service where ordinary citizens could report government, politician's, official's corruption..... Naaa , they can't have that.... it would disrupt their plans.
That's one thing that they would be very afraid of, people reporting them.... keeping them accountable.
71 posted on 04/27/2012 9:48:59 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson