Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arderkrag

What?

Look again.

“A Marxist rubber stamp is not as dangerous as a Marxist lame duck.”

Let’s ID the players here.

Marxist rubber stamp = Mitt.
Marxist lame duck = Obama.

I have - am - and will continue to argue that Mitt will be more dangerous than Obama.

Lets put this another way....

“A Marxist rubber stamp is MORE dangerous THAN a Marxist lame duck.”


72 posted on 04/25/2012 7:54:47 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd

Yes, that’s the point. The myth is that he’s not any more dangerous, which is why it’s on the list. The reality is that the rubber stamp is more dangerous, which the Mitt supporters don’t seem to grasp.


83 posted on 04/25/2012 8:01:36 AM PDT by arderkrag ("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson