Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not Excited About Romney? ^ | april 25, 2012 | David J. Peterson

Posted on 04/25/2012 9:11:41 PM PDT by Salvation

Not Excited About Romney?

This year’s GOP primary has been an odyssey filled with sound and fury. But, like elephants who never forget, millions of Republicans are muttering “haven’t we seen this movie before?” Conservatives who were looking for a solid alternative to Democrat Barack Obama are angry and disappointed. The party rank and file was opposed to the nomination of Mitt Romney, seeing him as a weathervane – willing to adopt any position or cause to suit his ambitions.

The Republican establishment, which is dominated by big business and the Wall Street elite, heard the same chorus of protests when Senator John McCain was nominated in 2008. The party elites argue that, as a centrist, Governor Romney has the best chance of beating the incumbent president in the November US elections. They claim that since his term ended in Massachusetts, a left-leaning stronghold, Romney’s positions have “evolved” and he is now closer to mainstream conservatives. Yet, his detractors say fielding a candidate who is clearly unable to articulate any coherent moral outlook is a big blunder.

American voters have not warmed up to the nominee. Since early 2011, Romney support among Republican voters in statewide polls never rose above 20 to 30 percent. In an ABC survey in March – just 34 percent of all voters had a favorable opinion of him. His unfavorable score, nearly 50 percent, was exceeded only by one other Republican, former House speaker Newt Gingrich, and by only one top candidate in 28 years, Hillary Clinton in 2008.

It is a mystery how a candidate so unpopular among average voters could remain the “front runner”. In addition, the single issue where Barack Obama is most vulnerable is his controversial national health care mandate. Unbelievably, it turns out that the original model for the “Obamacare” health law was first enacted by Governor Romney in Massachusetts. Both laws require everyone with income to purchase health insurance. As with Obama, Romney’s plan provides free contraceptive coverage, which Catholic and other religious institutions must pay for!

The outcome of the GOP primary season poses the question: is democracy taking a long sabbatical in the country where it all began back in 1776? First, there is the obvious issue of disparity in money. Multi-millionaires like Romney have a tremendous advantage over opponents. At the same time, candidates who are not responsive to the wealthy elite will always be swimming upstream. With access to unlimited donations raised by “SuperPacs,” the GOP winner shelled out hundreds of millions in slick attack ads – helping to vilify his opponents in every state primary. The two expected nominees have already raised a combined total close to US$400 million. Overall spending by both presidential campaigns in 2008 was $1.7 billion, 10 times what it was in 1976, and perhaps this will double in 2012.

A second major concern is how Governor Romney was originally designated as the front runner. Who determined that the Republican nomination was his, unless a challenger could snatch it away? It is hard to escape the conclusion that a corrupt bargain was in place from the start involving the top US elites, the GOP establishment and the national media barons. In modern election contests, the big media carefully frame the race between two poles, the liberal Democrats against conservative Republicans. In the primary debates the media make it next to impossible for a dissenting candidate to get anywhere near the nomination.

From 1970 to 2000, America’s former Christian culture has been stripped away like bark from a tree. As with Sarah Palin – a leading Christian conservative who was nominated for vice president in 2008 – a candidate who openly talks of a serious commitment to Christian or Biblical moral virtues is considered a “cult follower” or extremist.

This year former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former Senator Rick Santorum and even Texas Governor Rick Perry were all bullied and ostracized by partisan TV journalists. When Perry or Santorum made foolish statements, the media labeled them hopeless bumpkins who were unfit for higher office.

Mitt Romney’s blunders were criticized but labelled as just bumps in the road. But the front runner made several mega-gaffes where he appeared to be getting coaching from Ebenezer Scrooge. During the worst economic crisis in almost a century, multi-millionaire Romney stated “I am not concerned about poor people”. Elsewhere he bragged about how he enjoys firing people. He described government loans which saved two-thirds of the auto industry and over 1 million American jobs as a terrible mistake. After first stonewalling on his taxes, he revealed that by using loopholes and off shore accounts he paid only 14 percent, a rate well below that of most middle-income Americans.

For independent minded voters, including social conservatives and Christians, there is a temptation to simply avoid the race or to stay away from the polls this fall. The damage done by Obama in the next four years may not be as bad as one or two terms under a slightly less liberal alternative. Before he suspended his surprising campaign, Rick Santorum said the difference between Romney and his Democratic rival is negligible. Arguments about the lesser of two evils, which surface like a swarm of cicadas every four years, are sounding hollow.

As Plato noted in the Republic – in an oligarchy “there is not one state but two, one of the very wealthy, and one of everyone else. “If history is a guide, then Ben Franklin’s remarks at the 1787 Constitutional Convention should be noted. When asked – ‘what have we got?’ – he replied, ‘A republic if you can keep it’.” As in earlier eras, 21st century Americans will have to provide their own answer to his timeless warning.


David J. Peterson is an author and a high school teacher with a degree in economics. He lives in Chicago. 

This article was originally published on MercatorNet under a Creative Commons License.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alldems4romney; carter4romney; clinton4romney; cyktust; dnc4romney; du4romney; kerry4romney; liberal; loser; mormon; obama; obama4romney; romney; soros4romney; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last
To: Bigg Red

Or there will be a new American revolution should Obama win.

141 posted on 04/26/2012 10:24:38 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Thank you for your reply. I do believe our conversation has gone about as far as it can.

I plan to vote for >anybody but Obama. I will vote for the Republican candidate = ‘God willing & the creek don’t rise. or Come Hell or high water!’ I will NOT waste my vote.

My Priest said, ‘Obama gave our Bishops the finger!’

Luke6: 22, “Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude and insult you, and denounce your name as evil on account of the Son of Man.”

Luke10: 3, “Go on your way; behold, I am sending you like lambs among wolves.”

142 posted on 04/26/2012 10:34:45 AM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: caww

Thank you.

143 posted on 04/26/2012 10:37:08 AM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: gghd
I will vote for the Republican candidate =

Which, if it's Romney means the pro homo, pro baby killer guy. Don't bring God into this, because you've clearly turned your back on Him.

"But my hands are only a little bloody." Won't cut it on Judgement Day.

144 posted on 04/26/2012 10:39:18 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Katie, the RNC could care less if we fight them or not. This is all pre-determined long before the public is involved.....we simply are the road bumps they anticipate get in their way and have no difficulty getting around us...just as we've seen.

Until we have the ability to focus ahead on “their ‘next’ move,” before it's played, we will not stand a chance of defeating their goals.

Watching Newt in this you could see him attempting to do just that. Romney had a ‘full court’ on the ground and behind the scenes for 8yrs. and the financial backing to make it happen. He also had many powerful leaders with the ability and means to strong arm any who resisted or got in their way.....while they make a point to keep us otherwise occupied on stupid trivial issues the media runs with.

We have to know their game plans and we don't...those who do and fight behind the scenes have to be very careful who they inform...which therefore we seldom know the plays ahead of time...but we have to learn how to “see” them or the possibilities.

Who would have guessed Romney would proclaim the win before the NRC without the delegates? I doubt if many could have called that one, but it cut off at the knees the push for convention pretty much....that and ‘slick Ricky’ dropping out so Romney could go for that gold unencumbered...... otherwise Rick would have had no choice but to object to Romney's going before the RNC...Santorum was in Romney's court “before” he dropped out without a doubt, so Romney could make this play before the RNC.

Bottom line is ‘Santorum’ was the cog they put in the wheel from anyone other than Romney crossing the finish line...most especially Newt....

The race was between Newt and Romney...Santorum was the moving target to distract attention, and funding, and hold voters captive so Romney could run with the ball... It worked.

145 posted on 04/26/2012 10:50:18 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

This year’s election can be summed up with the following question:

Who will do more damage to America? Four more years of fast socialism opposed by the house (and hopefully the senate) or Eight years of slow socialism that is unopposed due to party loyalty.

146 posted on 04/26/2012 11:06:19 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I’ll NEVER vote for that dirty scum bag liar.

Having continued to look even deeper at Romney and his organizations powerful leadership...we are in for a whole lot more than what even Obama might imagine.

"A ravenous wolf in sheeps clothing" hardly says enough...our candidates only got a taste of what this man has behind him to make things happen his way.....and he'll do so behind the scenes while he projects his concern for this nation.

Remember Romney barely made any coherent plans or statements to the public about why he wanted to be President or how he would change the trajectory of this country....because basically his primary objective is to BE President, and that with a Globalist intention in mind..of our nations roll in funding the One World Financial Agenda.

Obama has set the third world countries in motion...and Romney will now do so with Europe and the more wealthy countries. Especially since he has people on the ground Internationally....IMO Romneys a socialist in drag....

147 posted on 04/26/2012 11:09:02 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: caww

No worries, mate. I think we are like-minded in regard to Romney. And many of the "vote for any body but Obama" crowd have their barbs out for us as we reveal Romney's Obama-like tendencies. So it's no big deal. Keep up the good fight.

148 posted on 04/26/2012 12:16:47 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: caww

You make a strong argument FRiend, and I admit I agree with you on many points. The notion I hold that Romney might govern from the center-right is admittedly as much about hopes for “half a loaf” as it is politics. Nothing’s guaranteed, except that conservatives have a rough four years ahead of them, no matter who wins.

Good post, btw.

149 posted on 04/26/2012 12:32:51 PM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo man is *always* intense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: so_real

I see your point, and I agree to an extent. I had to hold my nose to vote for McCain in 2008 (only the presence of Palin made it easier), and I would not condemn any FReeper who refuses to support Romney. I have no doubt that Romney would have more than a little bit of “squishy socialism” in his administration’s policies.

The fear I have is that with a second Obama term, it will be far worse. I agree that it gives we conservatives a rallying point to oppose his agenda. I think we’ll see the results of that even this year in the House and Senate elections. I’m just not sure it will be enough.

The economy will eventually improve, and if things get better, Obama will benefit from it. Stalling the agenda of a President with a 47% rating is a lot easier than one with a 60%+ rating. If his public approvals rebound, Obama may be able to push through proposals that he otherwise could not have gotten done.

I also have doubts about the Senate. The overwhelming support for Sotomayor and Kagan (68-13 and 63-37, respectively), gives me the willies at the thought of and second term Obama SCOTUS nominations.

That’s all just my opinion, of course. I certainly see where you’re coming from as well, and respect that view.

150 posted on 04/26/2012 12:44:35 PM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo man is *always* intense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Heh, fair point. I was thinking more along the lines of Club for Growth, Tea Partiers and what not, but I get what you mean.

151 posted on 04/26/2012 12:46:47 PM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo man is *always* intense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

May God Bless you. We will ALL give an accounting to Jesus Christ on Judgment Day.

& To remind you, My Priest said, “Obama gave our Bishops the finger.”

152 posted on 04/26/2012 12:49:37 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I also have doubts about the Senate. The overwhelming support for Sotomayor and Kagan (68-13 and 63-37, respectively), gives me the willies at the thought of and second term Obama SCOTUS nominations.

Without a doubt I share those willies, FRiend! Nothing, and I do mean *nothing*, good comes of a second Obama term. However, nothing good will come of four or eight years of Romney either. Having the republicans rubber stamp Romney's liberal agenda because he's "on our team" makes the slide into socialism even easier for him than Obama -- and it makes "our team" to blame for the failing. And as for the Supreme Court ... I take my lead from what Romney has already done to the courts in his home state. Have a read : Romney’s Record on Judicial and Legal Appointments: Can he be trusted as President to appoint conservatives to the Courts and Justice Department?. I expect he will do the same to Supreme Court *with* the full support of "our team" in Congress. That does not make him "as bad as" Obama ... it makes him "worse".

153 posted on 04/26/2012 4:29:18 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: gghd

**My Priest said, ‘Obama gave our Bishops the finger!’**

So true.

154 posted on 04/26/2012 4:38:10 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thank you for your reply.

& I know the ‘so true’ was for the Priest. +Your comment in praise of the Priest caused all the Angels in Heaven to sing the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel’s Messiah.

I have never heard a Priest say anything like that before in a Homily. The Priest wasn’t angry. He just described what happened so people would understand it. (& so I wouldn’t have a lengthy argument with people on freerepublic.)

The Hymn the Angels sing for me is “Dias Irae” (Day of Wrath). It’s currently on YouTube as “Gregorian Chant -Dias Irae.”

155 posted on 04/26/2012 7:43:51 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Romney may come in center right because he’ll have to come thru on his IOU’S. He’ll likely unpug the pipes just enough for a trickle to come thru and give a false sense of hope to businesses and the public. But it will assuredly be short lived....

Also he’ll impliment programs and such which do exactly as Obamas do but with a different name to appeal to the uninformed...and enough tweaking to make them look less formidable. But they will be one and the same.

The problem with Romney is his platform is the same as Obamas, just with a different name and a great deal of deception which will push it thru. At least with Obama we know what he’s up to...and can fight him.

I’m very much concerned the Republicans will see this as a win and not be on their toes....thus Romney will move his personal hidden agenda...there won’t be any resistance.

156 posted on 04/26/2012 8:10:03 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
One of the biggest complaints among this group was that Santorum was a social conservative who truly meant it and wasn't giving it lip service, and he was given nicknames like "Saint Rick".

Probably Libertarians who wish for morally devoid anarchy as much as leftists wish for morally devoid tyranny. To the extreme right anarchists ANY social order is to be avoided. To the extreme left socialists ONLY their social order is allowed. To both, a man like Santorum and all he represents is their enemy.

157 posted on 04/26/2012 10:39:12 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson