Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not Excited About Romney? ^ | april 25, 2012 | David J. Peterson

Posted on 04/25/2012 9:11:41 PM PDT by Salvation

Not Excited About Romney?

This year’s GOP primary has been an odyssey filled with sound and fury. But, like elephants who never forget, millions of Republicans are muttering “haven’t we seen this movie before?” Conservatives who were looking for a solid alternative to Democrat Barack Obama are angry and disappointed. The party rank and file was opposed to the nomination of Mitt Romney, seeing him as a weathervane – willing to adopt any position or cause to suit his ambitions.

The Republican establishment, which is dominated by big business and the Wall Street elite, heard the same chorus of protests when Senator John McCain was nominated in 2008. The party elites argue that, as a centrist, Governor Romney has the best chance of beating the incumbent president in the November US elections. They claim that since his term ended in Massachusetts, a left-leaning stronghold, Romney’s positions have “evolved” and he is now closer to mainstream conservatives. Yet, his detractors say fielding a candidate who is clearly unable to articulate any coherent moral outlook is a big blunder.

American voters have not warmed up to the nominee. Since early 2011, Romney support among Republican voters in statewide polls never rose above 20 to 30 percent. In an ABC survey in March – just 34 percent of all voters had a favorable opinion of him. His unfavorable score, nearly 50 percent, was exceeded only by one other Republican, former House speaker Newt Gingrich, and by only one top candidate in 28 years, Hillary Clinton in 2008.

It is a mystery how a candidate so unpopular among average voters could remain the “front runner”. In addition, the single issue where Barack Obama is most vulnerable is his controversial national health care mandate. Unbelievably, it turns out that the original model for the “Obamacare” health law was first enacted by Governor Romney in Massachusetts. Both laws require everyone with income to purchase health insurance. As with Obama, Romney’s plan provides free contraceptive coverage, which Catholic and other religious institutions must pay for!

The outcome of the GOP primary season poses the question: is democracy taking a long sabbatical in the country where it all began back in 1776? First, there is the obvious issue of disparity in money. Multi-millionaires like Romney have a tremendous advantage over opponents. At the same time, candidates who are not responsive to the wealthy elite will always be swimming upstream. With access to unlimited donations raised by “SuperPacs,” the GOP winner shelled out hundreds of millions in slick attack ads – helping to vilify his opponents in every state primary. The two expected nominees have already raised a combined total close to US$400 million. Overall spending by both presidential campaigns in 2008 was $1.7 billion, 10 times what it was in 1976, and perhaps this will double in 2012.

A second major concern is how Governor Romney was originally designated as the front runner. Who determined that the Republican nomination was his, unless a challenger could snatch it away? It is hard to escape the conclusion that a corrupt bargain was in place from the start involving the top US elites, the GOP establishment and the national media barons. In modern election contests, the big media carefully frame the race between two poles, the liberal Democrats against conservative Republicans. In the primary debates the media make it next to impossible for a dissenting candidate to get anywhere near the nomination.

From 1970 to 2000, America’s former Christian culture has been stripped away like bark from a tree. As with Sarah Palin – a leading Christian conservative who was nominated for vice president in 2008 – a candidate who openly talks of a serious commitment to Christian or Biblical moral virtues is considered a “cult follower” or extremist.

This year former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former Senator Rick Santorum and even Texas Governor Rick Perry were all bullied and ostracized by partisan TV journalists. When Perry or Santorum made foolish statements, the media labeled them hopeless bumpkins who were unfit for higher office.

Mitt Romney’s blunders were criticized but labelled as just bumps in the road. But the front runner made several mega-gaffes where he appeared to be getting coaching from Ebenezer Scrooge. During the worst economic crisis in almost a century, multi-millionaire Romney stated “I am not concerned about poor people”. Elsewhere he bragged about how he enjoys firing people. He described government loans which saved two-thirds of the auto industry and over 1 million American jobs as a terrible mistake. After first stonewalling on his taxes, he revealed that by using loopholes and off shore accounts he paid only 14 percent, a rate well below that of most middle-income Americans.

For independent minded voters, including social conservatives and Christians, there is a temptation to simply avoid the race or to stay away from the polls this fall. The damage done by Obama in the next four years may not be as bad as one or two terms under a slightly less liberal alternative. Before he suspended his surprising campaign, Rick Santorum said the difference between Romney and his Democratic rival is negligible. Arguments about the lesser of two evils, which surface like a swarm of cicadas every four years, are sounding hollow.

As Plato noted in the Republic – in an oligarchy “there is not one state but two, one of the very wealthy, and one of everyone else. “If history is a guide, then Ben Franklin’s remarks at the 1787 Constitutional Convention should be noted. When asked – ‘what have we got?’ – he replied, ‘A republic if you can keep it’.” As in earlier eras, 21st century Americans will have to provide their own answer to his timeless warning.


David J. Peterson is an author and a high school teacher with a degree in economics. He lives in Chicago. 

This article was originally published on MercatorNet under a Creative Commons License.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alldems4romney; carter4romney; clinton4romney; cyktust; dnc4romney; du4romney; kerry4romney; liberal; loser; mormon; obama; obama4romney; romney; soros4romney; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-157 last
To: cableguymn

Heh, fair point. I was thinking more along the lines of Club for Growth, Tea Partiers and what not, but I get what you mean.

151 posted on 04/26/2012 12:46:47 PM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo man is *always* intense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

May God Bless you. We will ALL give an accounting to Jesus Christ on Judgment Day.

& To remind you, My Priest said, “Obama gave our Bishops the finger.”

152 posted on 04/26/2012 12:49:37 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I also have doubts about the Senate. The overwhelming support for Sotomayor and Kagan (68-13 and 63-37, respectively), gives me the willies at the thought of and second term Obama SCOTUS nominations.

Without a doubt I share those willies, FRiend! Nothing, and I do mean *nothing*, good comes of a second Obama term. However, nothing good will come of four or eight years of Romney either. Having the republicans rubber stamp Romney's liberal agenda because he's "on our team" makes the slide into socialism even easier for him than Obama -- and it makes "our team" to blame for the failing. And as for the Supreme Court ... I take my lead from what Romney has already done to the courts in his home state. Have a read : Romney’s Record on Judicial and Legal Appointments: Can he be trusted as President to appoint conservatives to the Courts and Justice Department?. I expect he will do the same to Supreme Court *with* the full support of "our team" in Congress. That does not make him "as bad as" Obama ... it makes him "worse".

153 posted on 04/26/2012 4:29:18 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: gghd

**My Priest said, ‘Obama gave our Bishops the finger!’**

So true.

154 posted on 04/26/2012 4:38:10 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thank you for your reply.

& I know the ‘so true’ was for the Priest. +Your comment in praise of the Priest caused all the Angels in Heaven to sing the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel’s Messiah.

I have never heard a Priest say anything like that before in a Homily. The Priest wasn’t angry. He just described what happened so people would understand it. (& so I wouldn’t have a lengthy argument with people on freerepublic.)

The Hymn the Angels sing for me is “Dias Irae” (Day of Wrath). It’s currently on YouTube as “Gregorian Chant -Dias Irae.”

155 posted on 04/26/2012 7:43:51 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Romney may come in center right because he’ll have to come thru on his IOU’S. He’ll likely unpug the pipes just enough for a trickle to come thru and give a false sense of hope to businesses and the public. But it will assuredly be short lived....

Also he’ll impliment programs and such which do exactly as Obamas do but with a different name to appeal to the uninformed...and enough tweaking to make them look less formidable. But they will be one and the same.

The problem with Romney is his platform is the same as Obamas, just with a different name and a great deal of deception which will push it thru. At least with Obama we know what he’s up to...and can fight him.

I’m very much concerned the Republicans will see this as a win and not be on their toes....thus Romney will move his personal hidden agenda...there won’t be any resistance.

156 posted on 04/26/2012 8:10:03 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
One of the biggest complaints among this group was that Santorum was a social conservative who truly meant it and wasn't giving it lip service, and he was given nicknames like "Saint Rick".

Probably Libertarians who wish for morally devoid anarchy as much as leftists wish for morally devoid tyranny. To the extreme right anarchists ANY social order is to be avoided. To the extreme left socialists ONLY their social order is allowed. To both, a man like Santorum and all he represents is their enemy.

157 posted on 04/26/2012 10:39:12 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-157 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson