Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do the math: Senate could shift Republican in 2012
Human Events ^ | 04/23/2012 | John Gizzi

Posted on 04/25/2012 10:36:30 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: neverdem

If Willard is the nominee it is even more imperative to displace Harry Reed.


21 posted on 04/26/2012 6:15:10 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg123456
OMG....a poster with common sense:-)
don't forget the Supreme Court!!!
22 posted on 04/26/2012 6:21:25 AM PDT by southphilly (Every State should be a right to work State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

F U...from a 75 year old women..jack ass


23 posted on 04/26/2012 6:23:25 AM PDT by southphilly (Every State should be a right to work State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Greg123456

Any veep stupid enough to be on romney ticket is as bad as romney who is equally bad as obama so therefore by the transitive power of pretentiousness you are requesting that obama cast the deciding vote on senate ties. You’re not as conservative as me and the rest of the FR-e, blahblahblah.....


24 posted on 04/26/2012 6:24:34 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: southphilly
Looks like the remarks hit their target.

BTW, not a chance on taking you up on your offer.

25 posted on 04/26/2012 6:45:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: preacher
Dick is totally wrong on this one. If there's something Conservatives dislike more than filthy little communist pigs, its grown up Democrats who try to convince us they are really Republicans.

Best bet for Romney is to step down now.

26 posted on 04/26/2012 6:47:43 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So you don’t think Republicans can win the Senate this fall, huh? Just do the math.

Unless they do something really stupid {which they are very capable of doing} the pubbies are a solid lock to win the senate, keep the house and beat the hell out of obama.

Remember that stupid is the real name of the pubbie party for a reason, and you can't put anything past them, but as it is shaping up right now, it should be a tsunami, with debbie schultz killing herself on national TV.

27 posted on 04/26/2012 6:53:11 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorists savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh Lord, please make it happen!


28 posted on 04/26/2012 8:10:32 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska; Lazlo in PA; lentulusgracchus; muawiyah
Unless they do something really stupid {which they are very capable of doing} the pubbies are a solid lock to win the senate, keep the house and beat the hell out of obama.

Remember that stupid is the real name of the pubbie party for a reason, and you can't put anything past them, but as it is shaping up right now, it should be a tsunami, with debbie schultz killing herself on national TV.

I'm inclined to agree with you, USS Alaska and Lazlo in PA. Willard doesn't inspire the conservative base, but it will be the ABO vote from independents that carries the day, IMHO.

I'm not sure what Willard's political convictions are, or if he has any. If he has none, whatever he did in MA may mean mothing because MA was so far left, e.g. Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

When Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's seat, independent registration was just over 50 percent of MA's voters. (In January 2010 they were called non-affiliated or unaffiliated voters in MA. Rats were just over 38 percent. The GOP were a little over 11 percent.) In a NPR story from September 23, 2010, "Pew surveyed 2,800 registered voters, 37 percent of whom were independents." "Only 34 percent were independent in 2008."

Independent voters can be a huge demographic depending on the state. Now I know that likely voters and swing states are more important in presidential elections, but it was moderate and independent voters that left the GOP in 2006 & 2008, but they came back in 2010. I posted the exit polls for those years. Look under the keyword 20XXexitpoll. Substitute 06, 08 and 10 for XX in 20XXexitpoll.

Hold you're nose again in 2012. I know it hurts, but ABO!

If we're still here in 2016, that's a different story.

29 posted on 04/26/2012 3:45:37 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
The top of the ticket is not going to bring people in for the down ticket races.

Perhaps you have it backwards. People voting to kick out Dem incumbents in the House and Senate could create coattails to help Romney.

30 posted on 04/26/2012 4:45:45 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn
The top of the ticket is not going to bring people in for the down ticket races.

Perhaps you have it backwards. People voting to kick out Dem incumbents in the House and Senate could create coattails to help Romney.

31 posted on 04/26/2012 4:45:59 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You are using the older but certainly discredited belief about the structure of the American electorate.

Since absolutely everyone in this country is part of a class, employment category, or social group that in some way is primarily affiliated with one or the other of the two very large coalitions (which we call Republicans and Democrats) there are NO INDEPENDENTS.

LBJ, Nixon, Reagan, Clinton and Bush all won one or more elections by respecting the bi-modal saddle structure and picking off a coalition partner from the other side.

It is first necessary for the candidate to preserve his BASE, and if he doesn't he can't possibly win. Here we have a situation where Romney has actually alienated his base, as has Obama.

There is no race to the top here ~ it's all downhill ~ the only question is how many millions ~ on both sides ~ will refuse to vote for the top dog.

32 posted on 04/26/2012 6:05:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

doubt it. Mitt is a enthusiasm killer.


33 posted on 04/26/2012 6:21:04 PM PDT by cableguymn (Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Unless they do something really stupid


You mean like nominating a socialist to the top of the ticket?


34 posted on 04/26/2012 6:33:36 PM PDT by cableguymn (Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Now I know that likely voters and swing states are more important in presidential elections, but it was moderate and independent voters that left the GOP in 2006 & 2008, but they came back in 2010.

Are you saying that the story that the Emanuel-Pelosi "demoralization" campaign emphasizing GOP officeholders' scandals and criminality, and the side effort by gays to out Mark Foley, did not depress conservative turnout in 2006?

That the turnout dynamic of 2004, with conservatives being brought to the polls in droves by Karl Rove's down-ballot DOMA referenda, was not inverted by the 'Rats in 2006 through the emphasis on GOP disgustingness? That's what I've been reading heretofore. Was it all wrong?

You do realize that this "it's all about the independents" is a RNC/RiNO/Willard Romney meme. One that the neocons have been pushing ever since they were horrified by the Southern conservatives (social conservatives) who carried the Congress in 1994, and immediately started a culture-war campaign against them within the GOP halls of power, arguing for the exclusion and quarantining of Southerners as leprosy-ridden moral outcasts who would soil, taint, and defeat the GOP if embraced.

That theme was meat and drink at The Weekly Standard for something like eight or ten years after 1994. One of their leading lights, Christopher Caldwell, was pushing it wherever he could, after writing a cover story in The Atlantic Monthly in 1996.

35 posted on 04/28/2012 7:38:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

I have no idea what you said.


36 posted on 05/01/2012 11:24:14 PM PDT by Greg123456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Greg123456

That’s cause a person forfeits the need to make sense when mindlessly and constantly equating obama and romney


37 posted on 05/02/2012 4:11:23 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson