Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio Praises U.N., World Bank, IMF for Not Asserting ‘Narrow American Interests’
cns news ^ | Thursday April 26, 2012 | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 04/26/2012 6:52:25 AM PDT by Bigtigermike

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who was elected to his first term with help from the Tea Party in 2010 and who is sometimes cited as a potential GOP vice presidential pick, lauded the United Nations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for following their respective visions instead of asserting “narrow American interests” in a speech today on U.S. foreign policy.

In remarks at the liberal Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., Rubio sketched the advances made globally since the end of World War II as a result of America’s leadership.

“The purpose of the institutions we established, from the United Nations to the World Bank and the IMF was to spread peace and prosperity, not to assert narrow American interests,” said Sen. Rubio.

[...]

In his initial remarks, Sen. Rubio sought to separate himself from some conservatives in the Senate on foreign policy, saying that until recently the general view was that American conservatism “believed in a robust and muscular foreign policy,” citing Presidents George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. talbott

“But when I arrived in the Senate last year, I found that some of the traditional sides in the foreign policy debate had shifted,” said Rubio. “On the one hand I found liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans working together to advocate our withdrawal from Afghanistan or staying out of Libya. On the other hand, I found myself partnering with Democrats … on a more forceful foreign policy.”

“So I recently joked, the other day, that today in the U.S. Senate, on foreign policy, the further you move to the right, the likelier you are to move to the left,” said Rubio.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bilderberg; bushie; dckoolaid; dreamact; fl; florida; globalist; immigration; intervention; interventionist; jebbush; leftisright; marcorubio; nwo; pipa; rightisleft; rino; romney; romneyist; rubio; rubio4gope; sopa; un; unqualified; vp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-110 next last
To: Bigtigermike

Anyone who supports the UN, the Fed and the Dream Act, needs to be sent packing, IMO.


51 posted on 04/26/2012 8:37:31 AM PDT by Lucky9teen (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

No, it’s not your imagination and FR has become a bash GOP and conservatives forum. More time is spent bashing GOP candidates than is spent going after the Kenyan. Seriously, WTH?


52 posted on 04/26/2012 8:39:42 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of his birth (Does NOT meet the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Marco Rubio is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Marco's status is the same as that of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, who is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
_________________________

^^^^^^
THIS

53 posted on 04/26/2012 8:41:57 AM PDT by FReepaholic (Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

bttt


54 posted on 04/26/2012 8:44:28 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Rubio has become the new Palin, the favorite target of bashers. Why not spend time exposing, ridiculing, etc. the fraud in the WH now?


55 posted on 04/26/2012 8:45:24 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

bttt


56 posted on 04/26/2012 8:46:36 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Just trying to figure out, who (not saying you, trying to look wider here) would want to sideline Rubio, and for what purpose?
_________________________________________
DEMS, liberals, progressive, Commies, they HATE Rubio. He is the new Palin, the one they love to hate. He is threatening to them. Young, charismatic, nice looking, speaks well so he is competition because compared to the Kenyan, he is younger, more charismatic, better looking and can speak without a teleprompter.


57 posted on 04/26/2012 8:52:01 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

“He is an internationalist.” - Strobe Talbot

He was elected to serve the United States. He has stated in this that his loyalties lay elsewhere, and by this, he has disqualified himself from holding his current, or any future, US office. He is not worthy of representing Americans or pursuing American interests, either domestically or with other nations. In fact, he is a threat to America.

In coming out like this, he is only doing so for one of two reasons: either anticipating that he will be named Romney’s Vice President; or he hopes to be made head of one of these internationalist organizations, such as the IMF.

In 1972 Strobe Talbott, along with his friends Robert Reich (a fellow Rhodes Scholar) and David E. Kendall, rallied to his friends Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton to help them in their Texas campaign to elect George McGovern president of the United States.

After leaving government, he was for a period Director of the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. He is currently the president of the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, an anti-American organization, populated with former officials who now openly seek to undermine American authority and power to the advantage of internationalist organizations.

The former Soviet Foreign Intelligence Service operative Sergei Tretyakov claimed that SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) considered Talbott a source of intelligence information and classified him as “a special unofficial contact”, although “he was not a Russian spy.”


58 posted on 04/26/2012 8:52:28 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("It is already like a government job," he said, "but with goats." -- Iranian goat smuggler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Maybe it's time we acknowledged that anyone who spends time with the GOP ends up a RINO, regardless of good intentions. Whether they were a closet rino in the first place or succumbed to GOPe pressure, the result for America is the same.

It's time for all good conservatives to band together and make the Constitution Party a force to be reckoned with...and take our country back!

Trying to reform the Republican Party is like traveling west looking for a sunrise - ain't ever gonna happen.

59 posted on 04/26/2012 8:54:06 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Stop feeding the beast; spend money only with those who support traditional American values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“Marco Rubio was born May 28, 1971 in Miami, FL (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)...however...

Parents were Mario Rubio born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.
Oria Garcia born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.

Parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of his birth (Does NOT meet the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Marco Rubio is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Marco’s status is the same as that of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, who is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.”


60 posted on 04/26/2012 8:56:28 AM PDT by ldish (Give me Freedom and Liberty or...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Rubio has his own Etch-A-Sketch !

Draw up some Conservative talking points to get elected, then shack it up good and start over with what you truly believe.

61 posted on 04/26/2012 8:56:39 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ldish

DITTO man DITTO!


62 posted on 04/26/2012 8:57:26 AM PDT by ldish (Give me Freedom and Liberty or...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

He was born in the USA and meets all other requirements.


63 posted on 04/26/2012 8:59:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
No different than any other scumbag politican. They forget who got them there and what they promised to do.

"That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government..."


64 posted on 04/26/2012 9:18:46 AM PDT by Drill Thrawl (The United States of America, a banana republic since 1913)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; LucyT

the eligibility lawsuits would be filed immediately and it would just bring unecessary chaos to the GOP presidential campaign.
____________________________
Now that would be hilarious because if they hear Rubio’s case, they have to here the Kenyan’s. Maybe that is the main reason the Obots are so afraid of a Rubio VP choice.


65 posted on 04/26/2012 9:24:56 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

You wrote: “...Marco gave a really magnificent speech and made the case for Republicans/conservatives that Obama’s a failure.”

ECHO bttt:

Rush Limbaugh April 18, 2012:

Romney’s Weaknesses Pale in Comparison to the Obama Disaster
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/04/18/romney_s_weaknesses_pale_in_comparison_to_the_obama_disaster

“...Well, we have to admit this: There’s not a whole lot of passionate excitement behind Romney. But the alternative? People don’t want any more of this. They just don’t. ...”


66 posted on 04/26/2012 9:33:02 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ldish
Parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of his birth (Does NOT meet the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

I have been trying to find where that is a requirement for Art. II eligability and I can't. Where is defined that both Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis are required? I'm not trolling. I understand the social and political arguement but I can't find the legal one.

67 posted on 04/26/2012 9:35:26 AM PDT by Drill Thrawl (The United States of America, a banana republic since 1913)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

They’re all RINOS now and must be destroyed. I am dreading the day IF Sarah Palin endorses Mittens, then they will ALL be RINOS. No conservatives left. What then?


68 posted on 04/26/2012 9:35:39 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: al44

LOL! bttt


69 posted on 04/26/2012 9:37:00 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

infiltration of moles
_____________________________________
Major infiltration of Obots and they have free reign here now to troll the GOP candidate.


70 posted on 04/26/2012 9:37:12 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

Neither is the Kenyan unless he lied about who his father was.


71 posted on 04/26/2012 9:39:41 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

bttt


72 posted on 04/26/2012 9:40:27 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

bttt


73 posted on 04/26/2012 9:42:31 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ("Andrew loved the battle and he knew the stakes." ~ Mark Levin 3/2/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]




Boop the Bank Robber’s Nose!

Don’t Let Him Get Away With It!

Donate monthly to help abolish FReepathons
Sponsors will bark up $10 for each new monthly sign-up
Another sponsor will contribute $25 for each new Dollar-a-Day donor

74 posted on 04/26/2012 9:49:54 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

“I think this Rubio fellow is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Yes, and it’s discouraging.”


I think some posters on FR are trolls in conservative clothing-and THATS discouraging.


75 posted on 04/26/2012 10:23:34 AM PDT by icwhatudo (Tax codes and spending don't get 14 year olds pregnant and on welfare. Morality Matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
“The purpose of the institutions we established, from the United Nations to the World Bank and the IMF was to spread peace and prosperity, not to assert narrow American interests,” said Sen. Rubio.

Sounds to me like he's defending the U.S. saying we didn't start these institutions for some self-serving purpose but to spread peace and prosperity.

But that probably won't matter to the lynch mobs on FR. They're worse than the Trayvon crowd for finding someone guilty without even hearing the other side. Tiresome.

76 posted on 04/26/2012 10:52:35 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Read not just what he said, but what known scoundrels said about him at the same time. Sorry, but the nonsense from people like this has gone on long enough. If you lay down with skunks, you get up smelling like skunk.

What he said was not just rhetorical flourish, but an open embrace of anti-Americanism, no better than when those Supreme Court justices decided they should look to international law for their decisions, not just limit them to US law and precedent. Not their job.


77 posted on 04/26/2012 11:24:59 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("It is already like a government job," he said, "but with goats." -- Iranian goat smuggler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
Anyone who supports the UN, the Fed and the Dream Act, needs to be sent packing, IMO

The verdict is still out on Rubio with me. I do not look at speeches as much as I look at actions e.g. 0b0z0.

78 posted on 04/26/2012 11:28:04 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
How did you like this part of his speech?

...Third, we must reject protectionism and instead embrace the ultimate goal of a free trade area of the Americas. The recently approved free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama was a good step. We need to move forward to bring both Canada and Mexico into the Trans-Pacific Partnership...

79 posted on 04/26/2012 11:43:27 AM PDT by fallujah-nuker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Disgusting.


80 posted on 04/26/2012 11:48:01 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>>I have my own game...It’s called anybody but Obama/Romney and every other New World Order, anti-American Globalist out there...

IOW, you’re one more vote for Obama by omission.


81 posted on 04/26/2012 12:22:50 PM PDT by pabianice (ame with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; ASA Vet

Please resolve for me then the information in ASA Vet’s post above.

I’m not trying to be confrontational, but how is it that he is a Natural Born Citizen, yet the dates don’t seem right for that to be the case? I’m truly trying to understand.


82 posted on 04/26/2012 12:38:20 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

Maybe that’s a sheep in wolf’s clothing? He ‘s always seemed a bit lightweight to me——as someone said-—kind of Bushish?


83 posted on 04/26/2012 12:39:20 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Well, that does seem to be the case!


84 posted on 04/26/2012 12:39:47 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
The NBC argument (my view) is the result of real doubts about where Obama was born. If he was born in Indonesia, then he illegally occupies the White House.

Three tests qualify for the presidency. They are;
born in the US,
age at least 35, and
seven years living in country.

Nothing in the Constitution speaks to where a potential candidate's parents were born. The fact that his mom or/and dad was born in Cuba has no bearing on Marco's citizenship.

85 posted on 04/26/2012 1:05:20 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

>>>I so wanted to believe in Marco!

Americans should start believing in themselves, and not in their politicians. The reason why liberty has declined in America, is that the American people give the responsibility of defending freedom to politicians, and they fail to take personal responsibility for defending their freedoms.


86 posted on 04/26/2012 4:22:53 PM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

“No, it’s not your imagination and FR has become a bash GOP and conservatives forum. More time is spent bashing GOP candidates than is spent going after the Kenyan. Seriously, WTH?”

-

I agree with your frustration 100%.

However that said, the GOP ticket hasn’t yet been decided. The primaries are not over.

The GOP-e has set the terms: They dictate, we go along.

Frankly the GOP-e has become corrupt, and ARROGANT.

Very little in this world, is more repulsive, and generates quite so much visceral opposition, as arrogance.

The GOP-e has that arrogance, in spades.

That’s where we are right now. The arrogant ones, seem poised to win the battle.

Yet, the way they are doing so, very well could lose the war. That is in their court.

They can win over real conservatives in the remaining race. For example, bringing Sarah Palin into the mix.

(that would move mountains toward resolving this mess)

Or they can in effect say “scr#w you” to the right.

In which case, Obama will win.

I can see the fact, that’s really the remaining contest.

Even while seeing clearly, there’s simply nothing acceptable at all, about leaving Obama to do more damage to our beloved, and weakening nation.

Obama has to be beaten.


87 posted on 04/26/2012 8:52:50 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Obama ate his own dog as a child in Indonesia??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker

“How did you like this part of his speech?

...Third, we must reject protectionism and instead embrace the ultimate goal of a free trade area of the Americas. The recently approved free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama was a good step. We need to move forward to bring both Canada and Mexico into the Trans-Pacific Partnership... “

-

You could perhaps, point out where this is, in the speech?

Thanks.


88 posted on 04/26/2012 9:01:48 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Obama ate his own dog as a child in Indonesia??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Try the money/financial connections to make sense of what goes. Go all the way to the European banking cabal. These are the people calling the shots and promoting the dependency of the USA.


89 posted on 04/26/2012 9:13:33 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

They can win over real conservatives in the remaining race. For example, bringing Sarah Palin into the mix.
_________________________________________
YES!!!! but..... they won’t. They hate Sarah. She won’t lick their boots.


90 posted on 04/27/2012 7:44:01 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
For some on FR, ideological purity and perfection are required character traits in a candidate--perfect according to the poster, of course, which means no one escapes being called "RINO."

You NAILED it!



Where there's a shell, there's a way.

25 years ago, we had Ronald Reagan, Johnny Cash, and Bob Hope.
Today we have Obama, no cash, and no hope!

If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.

Or you can get raw with these strings.

How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).

And finally, this, dedicated to the one and only rdb2, WHO HAS RETURNED HOME!

Either way, the violin is sweet yet LETHAL.

Do it!

91 posted on 04/27/2012 9:18:12 PM PDT by rdb3 (If you were tried in court for being a Christian, is there enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
You could perhaps, point out where this is, in the speech?

Here is the text of the speech," you'll need to scroll down, perhaps two thirds of the way towards the end.

92 posted on 04/27/2012 11:58:15 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

How quickly the good become politicized.


93 posted on 04/28/2012 12:45:11 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
The Demlicans are for him. They don't give a rats azz about :


94 posted on 05/01/2012 2:19:17 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Fiat voluntas tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

Global visions for people with global ambitions.


95 posted on 05/01/2012 12:27:00 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Rubio isn’t running against the Kenyan. Don’t put all your hopes on Rubio, there are other options out there.


96 posted on 05/01/2012 12:29:24 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

So who is running against Obama this November? The only hope we have is to nudge Romney to the right. Consider that he lives in the Dante’s inferno of liberalism. He will have to moderate his views when he is president of the whole country and not just uber-liberal Massachusetts.


97 posted on 05/01/2012 12:33:55 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
Turns out Perry was an elected Democrat. Romney was a Democrat donor. Huntsman accepted a Democrat nomination. Johnson is a Libertarian. Paul is a Libertarian. Bachmann was into Democrat politics in college ~ and probably after (but she's not real clear on that).

Santorum, Gingrich and Caine are lifelong Conservative Republicans.

BTW, my basic standard on "who's RINO' is if you are actually not even a Republican, then you are not a Republican. If you served as a Democrat or for a Democrat or donated to Democrats, you are a RINO.

If you are also a LEfTWINGTARD that's an additional problem.

98 posted on 05/01/2012 1:11:05 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I know what YOUR definition of RINO is (you've waived your ignorance over the topic more than enough for everyone to know) and it is not what the ENTIRE rest of the world means by the term. Former party affiliation has absolutely nothing to do with the word RINO. RINO pertains solely to the political policies the individual supports. Is he in line with traditional Republican policy stances, or is he aligned with positions which are traditionally Democrat Party positions. . . . nothing more, nothing less.

Until you know the lexicon and the meanings of terms in use, you cannot cogently enter the conversation.
99 posted on 05/01/2012 2:01:40 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Reagan was a Democrat for many years.


100 posted on 05/01/2012 2:07:01 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson