Skip to comments.Let's put this to bed. We have bigger fish to fry.
Posted on 04/27/2012 4:56:50 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Everyone please send whatever you are able to, whether it is $10, $100 or $1,000+. The DUmmies, Morons, Kos Kiddies and that crew are laughing up their sleeves. Jim may have to make this site members only or allow ads. Better for us to just help with what we can. Maybe you can donate as a memorial for a lost loved one, a servicemember who never made it home or was disabled defending our country. Perhaps you'd like to give to keep free discussion alive and to show them that we're not knuckling under. I'm sure a well thought out or prayerful meditation will lead you to see the need and how you can help. If every registered FReeper and our lurkers would each just help out with a fin or a sawbuck, or better yet a Ben Franklin, we could put this to bed and get on with the conservative cause.
Until you have informed your own parents that death panels will judge their right to exist, until you have held the bucket that the abortionist drops the remains of your fetal granddaughter into, and until you are the bridesmaid at your son’s gay wedding, you are not a Fully Informed Romney Supporter.
Conservatives don’t do these things. Doing them to people you don’t know, out of expedience, is viler yet.
I fly the flag I came with regardless of the way the conflict turns, or even if what it represents any longer exists.
Apologize for breaking in your clubhouse; n00b out-
GOD FIRST ABSOLUTELY INDEED.
After family after that in this Nov voting situation?
Since you posted that to me (and for some reason copied others) I ask you (or them) is there a point there somewhere?
Like we aren't interested in the GOP, the same applies to you who never seem to get like you retread!
When I read the older threads, I am in awe of how intelligent the discussion
And then you came along with all your liberal wants, needs and whine.
Along with the obligatory comment when one is void of conservatism - Sarah shouldn't be celebrated but Romney should. Straight from the Romney handbook.
You won't be missed by us Patriots and your mindset is a dime a dozen heard throughout the 'gutless GOP' camp.
Now you speak for public figures!! And you wonder why any one with integrity do not take you serious?
Thank you Colofornian and Elsie for exposing the 'UGLY' truth about Mormonism right from their own literature - things the average voter would have no knowledge of. It's no wonder a Mittbot, WPacon, singles you out! You are a blessing to FR!
WPaCon shows he doesn't like doing the 'right thing' as that would be conservatism. Not pinging those he is accusing - shows a backstab mittbot mindset.
When you were on the RF, reading your posts, it wasn't rocket science to know you weren't interested in truth while witnessing your childish antics. Thanks for proving it!
Thanks! If WPaCon could post it without his name, he probably would have done that, also.
Let’s see, who does that remind me of - trashing conservatives while hiding behind the media? Mitt - so it’s Bishop Romney teaching his mittbots how it’s done.
Im staying out it this year. Theres no way I will support Romney in any way. I was hoping there were enough good conservative people left in this country to push for Sarah but have been amazed at what has happened. When I realized that even a great majority of those who call themselves conservatives werent going to stand on principle I was convinced that Newt was the closest we had to a conservative that I thought could carry the national vote. When even those who call themselves Tea Party Patriots started to back Romney I knew that if a brokered convention doesnt materialize and work what this country is going to get is total shock. We will have to pick up the pieces and start anew.
Evil doesn't present itself identically equal - that does not mean it not equally evil. This, IMO, is a test (maybe last) to see if one can be drawn into evil at all.
I can't! I support and voted for Newt. I don't have the worries/concerns of those who didn't support him. Did I chose wisely according to my beliefs, you betcha. To go against them, would show the foundation was built on sand and therefore, not the right foundation.
No, no, no -- several hours a day over the past 8 years.
I don’t see how Newt ever convinced folks he’s authentically conservative . . . .
Am I missing something?
5. Nationalism is... First wave. The globalization of business and finance by advancing Third Wave economies routinely punctures the national sovereignty the nationalists hold so dear... The Third Wave... demassifies culture, values, and morality... There are more diverse religious belief systems. The Consitution of the United States needs to be reconsidered and altered... to create a whole new structure of government... The Tofflers say fundamentalist, biblical Christianity is both dangerous and regressive. Beliefs in nationalism, patriotism, and an exclusive God, give birth to violence or repression.
Only when these Dark Age menaces are swept away can advanced wealth creation by the elite be achieved. Newt Gingrich Mason, member of both the World Future Society and the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote the forward to Alvin and Heidi Tofflers Creating a New Civilization
THE BOOK ON AMAZON with Gingrich’s name on the front:
How could any politico supporting this kind of
GLOBALIST MARXIST HIDEOUSNESS:
There are more diverse religious belief systems. The Consitution of the United States needs to be reconsidered and altered... to create a whole new structure of government... The Tofflers say fundamentalist, biblical Christianity is both dangerous and regressive. Beliefs in nationalism, patriotism, and an exclusive God, give birth to violence or repression.
BE CONSIDERED ON THE SAME PLANET AS CONSERVATIVE?
I can somewhat easily agree that OThuga and Marxist Mitt would both follow their NWO bosses’ orders on all major things. I just think that OThuga has such an intense level of demonization that he would typically throw extra vicious, harsh twists to the knife every chance he got. I’m a bit skeptical that Marxist Mitt would THAT demonically harsh. I could be wrong.
I just logically still have a hard time doing ANYTHING that would result in OThuga staying in office.
The guy is a super evil forerunner of the Anti-Christ from his bone marrow out.
The other thing that continually spouted is that voting does no good because it is already decided. I always thought hopelessness was the property of the leftist until I talked with some Ron Paul supporters. It really makes me wonder just who has taken over here.
“””””Welcome to Free Republic, Americas exclusive site for God, Family, Country, Life & Liberty conservatives!”””””
Your right....that is exactly what FR is and why i stay.....and those are the exact reasons why it is such a shame to see people be belittled and criticized because they have an idea or thought that may seem to run counter the “ruling class’ “ thoughts.....
your response to me at 1785 was so typical....i have few disagreements with you politically.....it is the “my way or the highway” attitude that i have issues with....
i suggested adds for revenue years ago and was treated like an idiot by you for even suggesting such a thing but now we are considering it????
A year or so ago i suggested some kind of advisory council to help the site and move FR forward....your response was belittling, unbecoming and not what one (I) should expect from the owner of this sight....
i stay on though....hoping for change because i still believe FR can change Washington but sadly i believe that opportunity is being wasted.....if not already lost....
No, we are not considering it. I posted what would happen and what FR would look like if we did.
And no I will not bend to the political winds. FR is and will remain a pro-life, pro-family, pro-small government site. This is non-negotiable, non-debatable. To hell with the abortionist ROMNEY and the big tent, big government RINO GOP-e. To that extent, on FR it is my way or the highway.
You know, I don't know why this would be a surprise to anyone.
Most of the mega-MSM venues are usually outspokenly pro-abortion. You don't expect them to spout something pro-abortion one day in their editorial policies & columns, and then something pro-life the very next day.
Oh, sure they may have LOTS of diverse writers writing the editorials. In many venues, 'tis all pro-abortion.
Oh, sure -- for the newspapers of the lot -- lots of readers contribute letters-to-the-editor, including pro-lifers.
But for some reason, the best pro-life letters-to-the-editors never make it in print in those particular dinosauer outlets.
And the editorial outputs -- the columns, the editors' stuff in many/most of these venues?...it's all pro-abortion.
Just because some liberal MSM have policies that allow for opposing stances doesn't = most of them being that way.
you miss the point, Jim
And your point is?
You got a LIST of them?
I can produce one of the foolish MORMONs that got themselves zotted for being STUPID.
Are THOSE the ones you speak of?
Looks like SOMEone is trying to boost their street cred in Provo!
In your FACE; Rush!!
You think YOU have influence???
What has integrity to do with it?
Merely having TWO brain cells to rub together would qualify a person...
I don’t wanna look!
Do you always go around & gossip behind people's back? Is that just norm for your lifestyle? (Considered common online courtesy to ping them when speaking about them to others)
There's a few "anti-Scientology-ism" people around as well. Do you go around to those sites & ensure you defend the Scientologists as well? Or does Mormonism have some special "ism" appeal to you not found in Scientology? [I post on Mormonism here because (a) I am a descendent of a Mormon leader; and (b) Conservative Mormons post & lurk here)
Do you object to the Mormons for using both Lds.org -- and its doorbell-ringing -- as a platform for its anti-Christianeering, or do you lopsided side with the Mormons? [take any phrase below, cut & paste it & go to Lds.org to find it...re: the Lds missionaries...see the last row in the chart below]
Mitt Romney, Dec, 2007, speaking @ the George Bush Presidential Library: "I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers I will be true to them and to my beliefs."
Snapshot of Joseph Smiths Slanderous Invectives vs. Christian Sects
Mormon Source[Note: Most of these are Mormon scriptures'. In fact, First three rows below are Lds 'scripture' & therefore cannot be rug-swept any more than a Jew might try to take three commandments off of the very tablets of stone Moses brought down from the mountain]
|...which of all the sects was right must join NONE of them, for they were ALL WRONG those professors were ALL CORRUPT ||Joseph Smith History vv. 18-19. Lds "scripture" Pearl of Great Price|
|...which of all the sects was right ALL their CREEDS were an ABOMINATION in his sight they teach for doctrines the commandments of MEN ||Joseph Smith History vv. 18-19. Lds "scripture" Pearl of Great Price|
|Mormon church the only Christ-sanctioned church on earth: the foundation of this [Mormon] church the ONLY true and living church on the face of the whole earth [Obvious scorched earth implication: All other churches are false and dead]||Lds scripture Doctrines & Covenants 1:30|
|Direct question asked of Joseph Smith: 'Will everybody be damned, but Mormons?" Answer from Lds "prophet" Joseph Smith: 'Yes, and a great portion of them, unless they repent, and work righteousness."||Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 119 [Not scripture but still publicly spoken by the Mormon living prophet and published by a later Mormon living prophet, Joseph Fielding Smith via a publisher owned by the Mormon church Deseret News Press, 1938]|
|In 1952 the first official proselyting plan was sent to missionaries throughout the world It included seven missionary discussions that emphasized [four topics, one of them being] THE APOSTASY and Restoration [This makes it almost 60 years that Mormon church missionaries, now numbering 52,000, have formally emphasized in its training & door to door saturation a priority in bashing the worldwide Christian church as apostates (100% AWOL)]||Our Heritage: A Brief History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints p. 116, 1996|
I agree, but that is precisely what the GOP-e did in putting forth Romney as the nominee. He has an (R) next to his name so he won't pull off many (D) votes from Obama, and he's so closely matched to all of Obama's administrative history that no conscientious Conservative will vote for him: there is no way he can beat even the worst President in our history, why, then, would he be put forth as the only candidate who can beat Obama. It is totally illogical unless the GOP-e prefers another Obama presidency to a Conservative one.
I would say rather that he makes anyone seem Conservative by comparison - even Bill Clinton seems Conservative compared to Obama, so why does Mitt Romney look like he has so much in common with him?!
Certainly it’s a pretend choice concocted in hell.
I don't see how Mitt convinced ANYONE he's even a Republican much less a Conservative! He doesn't even belong on a GOP ticket! Just for starters, what does initiating and putting a stamp of approval on same sex marriages and baby killing and socialistic healthcare have to do with the GOP platform?
Who would have thunk it - evil invading territory where the door was left open. And then convinced others he's 'one of them'!! And then spent millions upon millions attacking the who who is the exact opposite of him and that deception goes on to deceive even more. Evil moves very quickly, as we know it does, when it has very little resistance. Evil has to be fought, not dawdled over with trying to decide is it worse than another evil. IMO, Mitt should have been dropped kicked off the first debate, instead 'it' was kissed by others, 'covered' by others, 'high-fived' by others, thumbs up by others, given #1 status by others. Repulsive to watch.
Going on how others see Newt is none of my concern, if you have to look through another eyes to see what they want you to see, that's your problem. IIRC, someone, also, told you SARAH was NWO. One will see what is upper most in their mind/heart and NWO is that w/you - so even if it's not there, any word of theirs you will see a NWO attachment. IMO, it clouds you from seeing the difference between good vs evil. IMO,
Im a bit skeptical that Marxist Mitt would THAT demonically harsh. I could be wrong.
Well at least you admit you could be wrong. NO ONE else knows either - only God knows. Remember those who voted for Barry had NO IDEA the depths evil would work through him.
But you are holding Barry as a standard to judge how evil Romney can't be. That's about a 'no knowledge' mental gymnastic as one can be. Evil doesn't have a STOP code.
Since only God knows the future - I will NEVER assume one evil if worse or better than the other. Because that would be looking with 'natural eyes' and making a decision based on that. Expect to be fooled every time because Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things 'not seen'.
My faith is in God, first, last and always. No one knows how God plans to work through Newt. God works through imperfect vessels because He has NO perfect vessels to work through - there are NONE. But He does NOT work through evil vessels - that is satan's job. Barry and Mitt are both evil - i.e. their pro homo agenda and pro baby killing stance is an abomination to God, that's what evil is.
NWO is coming as we know from Scripture. But you have NO IDEA 'who/when/where'. So attaching it to everyone who comes on the political scene will leave you deceived. Think PRESENT!
Leave your 'conservative hasn't convinced you/others enough' concerns aside and your NWO litmus test - THINK CHOOSING between GOOD vs. EVIL. This is NOT rocket science - it would be revealing, though, if you flunked Christianity 101. Then you would be no different than the world.
WPaCon - I don’t know what your problem is, but I’ll bet it’s hard to pronounce.
You might remember if you are sooooooo hooked on proper FR behavior to ping those who you name in your post so they have an opportunity to reply. How much have you ever ponyed up WPaCon? Or have you been a freeloader? You don’t like it here, then perhaps DU is a better forum for your dribble.
A zot would be too kind for you - but well earned for the bile you’ve posted.
Exactly, the easiest of all proper behavior and WPaCon fails!
What can be said but this was never the place for him! No wonder he has a loooong list of whines.
I believe this is where the church comes in since their gov't failed them. Shock!
Newt was the closest we had to a conservative
NO DOUBT about it!!
Well said, Big Guy.
Worthy points. Thx.
You may have missed that Newt
ALLIED HIMSELF with NWO and their hostilities to Christianity, family etc. . . . for example, by writing the forward to Toffler’s horrid NWO book.
I have neighbors in Virginia that can never vote for a Mormon, French surrender monkey, like Mitt Romney. His positions change every day. Now, he is for bailouts again!
Trashing Romney as a Mormon is a moot point, when you can trash him for Romneycare, Gay Marriage, Flip / Flopping.
I was told earlier this week that the Religious posts are suppose to stay in the Religious Area of Free Republic.
Sorry I'm just getting caught up on this thread I was gone after 12PM this weekend not getting home till late.
Only thread I was able to post on was a flavored vodka thread and a Crook County Judge who actually shocked the world by throwing out the unconstitutional internet tax that our Rat from hell Gov. passed.
Seems like things have cooled down big time, but I see a big difference in long winded posts about Mormons, Catholics, Jews, Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists and posts saying "For God and Country" or "I will trust in God".
So if someone could clarify to me if the rules have changed because the Religion_Moderator was incredibly helpful in showing me how to block reading Religious threads. Something I could care less about.
What? Just like you apparently only practice your religion on Sunday morning? Is that why the ELCA had Tiller-the-late-term-abortionist-killer as an usher for years in an ELCA church? Or the BTK Kansas serial killer as a lay president of an ELCA church? Or why the ELCA has as part of its health insurance the ability for staff members to abort their young...with $ from offering plates? Or why homosexuals can be pastors in ELCA churches? All because they've learned how to properly "compartmentalize" the Bible and their "faith" from applying to ethics, or how you treat your offspring, or sexuality issues?
First of all how would you know what sect of Lutheranism I am?
Secondly, I haven't been to Church in over a month (do I burn in Hell for that?)
So Colofornian, What is the only TRUE religion that I should believe in, in order to get to Heaven? You seem to be an expert on every religion. Maybe I can convert to paganism? Or go super traditional and become Catholic?
What religious sect is the only way to Heaven?
Do you have a little black book where you write down all of the FReepers who state what Church they attend?
Now I simply asked what the RULES were regarding religious posts. As usual you stick with personal attacks. I don't think you just hate Mormons, I think you despise anyone who isn't in whatever sect or cult that you belong to.
I think the ante has been upped.
I don’t think it’s sufficient for folks to merely be in the same lock-step, goose-step cult. They now have to be in a constant Vulcan mind meld with one another and with the local Dear Leader.
The long winded posts with dozens of links don't belong in the News area. They belong in the Religion Area.
Now if the rules have changed I think we should all know about that.
If the rules have changed will Colofornian be able to rip me for being Lutheran every day non stop?
If I wanted to debate religion I'd go to a religion forum. I'd rather stick with News/Activism.
You are in my prayers.
If you reside in a battleground state....yes you will be blamed.