Skip to comments.Student Branded A 'Slut' By Rush Limbaugh Set To Marry Boyfriend Of Eight Years
Posted on 04/27/2012 8:54:54 PM PDT by Steelfish
Student Branded A 'Slut' By Rush Limbaugh Set To Marry Boyfriend Of Eight Years By HUGO GYE 27 April 2012
The law student whom Rush Limbaugh called a 'slut' when she argued that students should have access to free birth control has become engaged to her long-term boyfriend.
Sandra Fluke, a student at Georgetown University, is set to marry Adam Mutterperl, who is a writer and producer based in Los Angeles. The announcement caused controversy when a Fox News contributor was forced to apologize after suggesting Ms Fluke might be a lesbian.
Ms Fluke, 30, has been dating Mr Mutterperl, son of a major Democratic donor, for more than eight years.
The couple told the Daily Beast: 'We're just excited that our friends and family were kind enough to pretend to be surprised at our engagement.
'We're really looking forward to spending the next eight years planning our wedding.'
After Ms Fluke graduates from law school, she will move to LA with Mr Mutterperl. His father is William Mutterperl, who is said to have given money to the Democrats on dozens of occasions.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Can you say "15 minutes more??"
If they were really meant to be together, it would not have taken them eight years to realize it.
Hope I’m wrong for both their happiness sake. But this smacks of “wrong reasons”.
The white wedding gown, sadly, has no significance these days.
I attended a wedding last year and the bride wore white. She was 3 months pregnant, and escorting her down the “aise” were her two boys from two previous “relationships”. I was probably the only person there that thought this was beyond belief.
Did anybody else catch this statement??? I don't think they will ever get married.
There was a time when a girl would be ashamed if she had gone too far before she was married. Never would she announce anything like that to the world.
Flaunting their sin in the streets - it’s certainly here.
That’s not a fiance, that’s cover.
She is a slut because she made herself a slut and she will take this fool to the cleaners and probably leave him in massive debt and with a burning crotch.
They won't pay for the birth control because they want grandchildren, eh?
Is anyone else bothered by the presence of the word "access" in this discussion?
One can have access to a commodity if it is available, regardless as to whether it is free or it costs money. The implication with the use of this word is that, unless it is "free", the commodity will not be available, and this is a complete lie. Those who could afford it have always had "access", yet the commodities and services would be free to them too.
Those who push free contraceptives and abortifacients have never advocated means testing to qualify for the handout, so the word "access" has no place in the discussion.
Sounds like they’re made for each other!
> ‘We’re really looking forward to spending the next eight years planning our wedding.’
EIGHT YEARS to PLAN a wedding?
She’s arguing that a Catholic university should forgo religious dogma to serve the hedonist NOW culture even though it goes against their teachings.
She targeted the school and is a hater.
Did anyone find pictures of her at last year’s “slut walk” in Georgetown yet? As an activist, it’s likely she was there.
“Eatin’ ain’t cheatin’”
She sure has a thing for homosexual causes.
The news of her wealthy boyfriend came out within a month of the Rush story because she posted travel photos from a European vacation to social media.
She isn’t just after taxpayer support, she was attacking the Catholic Church.