“We wanted him to stay . . .”
The Presumptive GOP has etch-a-sketched his first decision.
Now if he can etch-a-sketch his attack on the boy scouts, then maybe Romney has a chance of fooling some conservative that’s not paying attention about what Romney really is about.
Grenell doesn’t need anyones help making his sexual orientation an issue.
“Grenell also thanked Romney for not making his sexual orientation an issue when he was hired.”
Two months after leaving his United Nations position in 2008, he criticized the Bush administration for not backing a United Nations declaration calling for an end to laws that discriminate against homosexuals.
Th guy was an activist...probably stepped to the plate...said take me...and then...sorry.....but people are homophobic aka (have high moral standards).
Willie Mitty better get himself another one real quick so thaty he can continue his love affair with the Log Cabin Republicans...
Wouldnt want his homosexual base to think he had forgotten his promise about national wide same sex marriage...
"Hmmm, do I hire a homosexual advisor and get the vote of a tiny slice of the 1% homosexual population and alienate millions of social conservatives?
"Or do I hire a straight advisor and risk the opposite?
"Hmmm, why don't I carve out a middle position by picking a homosexual then saying I had to let him go because of those intolerant social conservatives....?"
Romney is an abortionist/homosexualist/statist. Always has been, always will be. And a liar to boot. He now claims he’s always been pro-life, and ALL of his positions (quite frankly) have been conservative, and that his crowning achievement, RomneyCare, is a conservative free-market solution.
This means he believes that the positions he has long advocated for like abortion is conservative. That gay rights, global warming, gun control, liberal judges, TARP, bailouts, the takeover of GM, stimulus spending, never ending increases to the debt limit, compulsory health insurance, mandates against the people, tax penalties for non-compliance, forcing hospitals and Christian organizations to perform abortions, promote homosexualism, etc, all positions that he’s advocated for and some of which he still advocates for today are conservative positions.
The man is a liar and or an idiot if he believes that his positions are conservative and always have been!! And he’s stabbing us in the back every chance he gets!!
Ann Coulter Romney, the self decribed GOP-E’s “Judy Garland” - isn’t going to be happy about THIS news.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Ann Coulter Romney or the Next Arianna Huffington?
I must admit that for a few years, mainly during the Slick Willie era, I was an admirer of Coulter. But as the years passed she began to resemble a women seduced by public adulation. Perhaps she spent too much time at the New York cocktail parties.
As most of us know, Ann is now the Honorary Chairperson of GoProuds Advisory Council. Goproud is a national organization of gay conservatives and they claim that Coulter has put them on the map. Thanks Ann! You have really done so much to blur the line of distinction between the GOP & the DNC.
Perhaps just is bad is the fact that she is at the very least a personal friend and defender of Bill Maher, one of the best known antagonists to Christians and conservatives in the entire nation. She was recently on Sean Hannitys show defending Maher as she spoke of how funny Maher is. She claims that we do not see the better sides of Maher because only his controversial comments make the headlines.
That Coulter has the audacity to defend Bill Maher as very funny- after he made fun of Rick Santorums sick child - is by itself all the evidence one needs to rightly conclude that this women has a glaring character flaw and is to conservatism what Benny Hinn is to Christendom.
Coulter praises Maher approximately 6 minutes into this interview with Hannity.
It is no surprise that she has sold out the 70% of the party who are conservatives in favor of her east coast liberal crush Mitt Romney. Lets see how many books the 30% buy after the elections are over and they throw her away like a paid escort.
Many of the people who purchased Ann Coulters books and paid ridiculous quantities of cash for her to come out and speak were the pure conservatives of the Republican Party. I cannot imagine that she is going to be raking in the kind of money to which she has become accustomed.
At this point, if Coulter was the keynote speaker at a conservative event I attended, many conservatives would be more inclined to throw a pie in her face than to applaud her.
So Coulter is betting the farm and has tied her fortune to Mitt Romney winning the presidency. Now thanks to the pioneering of Mitt Romney, Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy in Massachusetts, we now have homosexual marriage being legalized across the blue states of America. It is only logical that some polygamists will be DEMANDING the rights too.
So when that happens, if Romney was President (hypothetically), what is the likelihood that he would intervene in attempts to legislate homosexual and polygamist marriage? What is the chance he would VETO such legislation?
Well, we can all pretty much assume that Mitt Romney is on board with that guy after whom they named their University Brigham Young.
If we look at what the great Brigham Young had to say about the issue, it is lucidly clear what we could expect from Romney if faced with federal legislation:
“Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned; and I will go still further and say, take this revelation, or any other revelation that the Lord has given, and deny it in your feelings, and I promise that you will be damned.
Brigham Young - JoD 3:266 (July 14, 1855)
Inside Mitts mind: Set thought captions, Lets see, approve of plural marriage and shack up with multiple babes - or- be damned to hell? Hmmmmm .”
I know it sounds crazy but these days, everything sounds crazy until it becomes plausible, then it becomes reality in a few more years.During the Florida primaries, Ann bragged of a scenario (on Fox & Friends) in which she went to Romney on the campaign trail and told him you owe me big-time. So perhaps Ann has hope of becoming the NEXT Ann Romney. As Ann Coulter Romney, she wouldnt have to keep hawking books for a living.
So if Mitt Romney becomes the nominee and loses the election (a likelihood), having betrayed her audience repeatedly - will she be forced to go to the other side and become the next Arianna Huffington?
No doubt with her abrasive style, she could make a FORTUNE selling bs to the left. (She’s already half-way there with her homosexual connections and her Bill Maher relationship.)
The gullible left would eat it up like WWE fans . Face it, we had some good times but she probably never won over a single liberal in her career. Rallying the troops was always her shtik but realistically - that gig is over.
Not exactly a great start to the campaign.
The gay guy became a liability to Romney....and he got das boot quickly.
The can of worms has been taken care of professionally......and everyone gets off the hook with their facades/reputations intact.
This is how major league campaign problems are handled....surgically, fast and as humanely as possible.
(© pending ;-)
You can NOT be moral and hold the “homosexuality/sodomy is good” worldview. Sodomy is always evil. The US Constitution is founded on Moral Absolutes—on Objective Truth—Natural Law Theory—which believes that man is designed by God—not that there is NO DESIGN to humanity and laws are arbitrary=man is woman is boy, etc., nonsense of radical egalitarianism.
Denying male and female natures is Marxist and designed to destroy the natural family—and religion. Harry Hayes was a Communist. To destroy reality—like the Europeans are doing to condition little children into believing there is no male or femaleness in man— is a joke and stupid. It removes reality and destroys logic and truth in young children’s worldview. Exactly what Islam does. It destroys the worldview that there is a God—a Designer—and Right and Wrong. If Sodomy can be “good” and a “right” then, Evil becomes good and there can be no Right and Wrong except that which is man-made and arbitrary—like the laws of Hitler and Stalin.
Homosexuals deny Natural Laws—just as Karl Marx did—and Atheists do. The ideology is anathema to the Constitution and unity under God and destroys rational thought. It reduces man to base animals where urges trump reason.
Romney has a non-Christian convoluted ideology which is anathema to the Constitution. He can not use logic and reason since it comes from Natural Law Theory which has been embraced by true Christians and unique to the Founding of the USA, since it is the basis of our Constitution and all logic and Rule of Law.
“The Romney campaign had come under fire in some conservative circles for hiring Grenell. Writing for National Review, Matthew Franck argued that Grenell’s staunch pro-gay-marriage advocacy could mean that he would pursue an agenda that elevates gay rights above religious freedom in a future Romney administration.”
This is exactly what happened in Canada when John Tory, the Canadian equivalent to CINO Romney, led the Ontario Conservative Party. Here’s the story (and photo-op) that led to conservatives staying home, despite Tory’s incumbent opponent being to the left of Obama:
That Romney (and his handlers) didn’t see anything wrong with hiring Grenell is the problem with Romney.
When will Romney resign, so that he can be replaced by an actual conservative candidate for ‘12 POTUS?
Love, just love to know what he said about women in his “tweets.” Undoubtedly, the fair sex would be flattered immensely.
Glad he’s gone.
I’m guessing RINOmney chose him to appeal to gays...