You have no idea what agony I personally experienced between your first comment and my response.
Any discomfiture you might, or might not, have experienced isn't my concern. It sure didn't stop you from continuing to post your recommendations for the bill despite being told it was BS.
I can not, would not, dispute Herb Titus.
Yet you did just that by urging others to support the bill. You apparently did no research on it whatsoever after that first reply of mine, nor did I see then you asking why it was a bad bill. Instead you chose to continue to post it anyway.
However Bret Baiers comments have aroused controversy in regard to Obamas eligibility. This is a GOOD thing.
All Bret's comments did was show that he's just another talking head who parroted what he had been told. He used Byron York of the Washington Examiner as his only source.
The controversy was already aroused. It got aroused in his direction and he obviously was disconcerted by it.
His was one of the most pronounced backpedals I've ever witnessed. If such a piece happens the guest speakers will be most telling.
I visit here to learn from the well informed people at Free Republic. I do not come here to debate and argue with you or anyone else.
I suggest that your time and effort would be better spent by challenging someone other than a 65 year old grandma whose only intention is to keep Obama from further destroying this country.