Skip to comments.Forward to Socialism!
Posted on 05/02/2012 11:08:56 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Someone in the Obama campaign should find a new line of work. They've adopted as a slogan the single word: Forward! You've heard those complaints from conservatives that Obama is a socialist? Well, Forward! is one sure way to validate those concerns. Forward! has been the slogan of Marxists for more than a century. Vorwärts is not a soccer rival to Harry Potter's Hogwarts school, that home of witchcraft and wizardry. Vorwärts was the German language name of the Socialist newspaper for generations of European leftists.
In Russia, Vladimir Lenin's Bolsheviks used the word Vperyod! Now, if you had been accused day in and day out of being a Marxist, would you run for re-election with such a freighted word? It's a comment on American education that a candidate for president can use a Communist word and expect no one will notice or object.
Maybe the Obama team is just taking cues from MSNBC. They try to deny their far-left orientation with the disarming slogan: Lean Forward. Try to imagine that we're on the rim of the Grand Canyon, staring down at the chasm of debt that this administration has dug for. This president has dug a hole of debt in three years deeper than all previous forty-three presidents. And while we're hanging out over that canyon rim, MSNBC tells us to lean forward.
It's surprising that President Obama didn't pick up on the unsavory associations with the word Forward! It's like David Duke not getting the problem with white sheets.
In his book, Radical-in-Chief Stanley Kurtz takes great care to document Mr. Obama's ties to American socialists. Obama admits in his memoir that he attended the Socialist Scholars Conference in New York City in April 1983. The way Obama tells it, going to that conference was part of the delightful intellectual smorgasbord of activity that a Columbia student samples in Manhattan. You know, Lincoln Center, the Bronx Zoo, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Grant's Tomb -- all that cultural stuff in the Big Apple.
The only problem with this scenario is that the agenda of the Socialist Scholars Conference in 1983 was pretty clear: How to bring Socialism to America without importing all that nasty, brutish KGB and GuLAG apparatus from what President Reagan was calling the evil empire.
Those democratic Socialists may well have hit on the formula: work against the family, abolish marriage, crush small businesses, take over big ones. Nationalize student loans and home mortgages, the two biggest items in the American family budget. You don't have to nationalize everything. As former Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsby said, just the "commanding heights" of the economy. Nice Marxian phrase there, Austan.
Stanley Kurtz is quite careful to distinguish President Obama's radicalism from that of the Continental Marxists. Kurtz will not go where the evidence does not lead. He finally concludes that Barack Obama is a Socialist, but he's a Socialist like the left wing of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.
Now, it was hard enough to get Americans to muster on the village green when Paul Revere rode through "every Middlesex village and farm" crying out "The British are coming! The British are coming!" But stand they did and fired the shot heard `round the world.
During the Cold War, Hollywood's Alan Arkin made fun of anti-Communists here with a spoof called "The Russians are Coming! The Russians are Coming!"
So it's not hard to figure out why Stanley Kurtz's book did not raise greater alarms. How do you get folks stirred up yelling "The Swedes are coming! The Swedes are coming"?
The serious question we need to ask ourselves: Does the Swedish Socialist model work, even for Sweden? Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia will find it increasingly impossible to meet the demands of their social welfare systems with an ever-shrinking native-born population. That's why Sweden has taken to importing folks from the Third World. And that, tragically is why the ancient city of Malmő has become dangerous for Jews. The children and grandchildren of people who fled there with the rise of Hitler are being forced out by the rise of jihadist anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semitism is the inevitable result of the politics of re-distribution. We should not forget that in Germany, it was National Socialism that blamed the Jews as that nation's one percent. Socialism didn't work in the USSR, but anti-Semitism was rife. That's why millions of Soviet Jews fled when they had the chance.
The reason Socialists always proclaim Forward! as their slogan is that they never want you to look at their record. Don't look back at the wreckage of the economy and the dangers to liberty. Just keep marching together, Forward! indeed.
“Forward” is good as long as you’re facing in the right direction.
I do not understand. Please elaborate..
c’mon Socialism did not go anywhere when private enterprise provided employment to Americans instead of exporting our production economy to the world. Put those 25 million un/under employed on private payrolls and they won’t rely on the government and there won’t be any more ‘Obamas’.
>>>And the official(FR) answer to this is, lets not vote for the Republican nominee. Brilliant.<<<
The sad reality appears to be the choice between a hardcore Marxist and a Fabian socialist. Romney’s slogan would be, “Cautiously move ahead while working with the Communists.”
Maybe we’re all wrong about Mittens and his proclivities, but his record indicates a history of “getting along” and “comprimise.” The left, of course, has no such history. God help us.
Yes, we have a socialist government right now. But Obama must go. He is not even a citizen. He is some sort of foreign agent. Romney is not the immediate answer to all our problems but reelecting Obama will be a disaster!
Gawd, are we really going to have to endure six more months of this shit?
Six months? Don’t you mean years? It’s either four more years of 0bama or four-to-eight of Romney. Socialism forever!
It sucks, but it is the reality we face. I choose the slow road to socialism (Romney, hopefully with a strong R House and Senate) over the fast road (Obama, even with a strong R House and Senate) any day.
Kind of like a gunshot verses cancer
if cancer is chosen, there may still be gunshots.
No third option?
Calling Captain Kirk ...
First of all I have no intention of staying home. Secondly a vote is a vote for someone or something and nothing else. No vote is no vote period. That is reality not that manipulative propaganda of "Staying home is a vote for 0bama."
I recommend conservatives everywhere attend Obama rallies and whenever someone yells, “Forward!” all the conservatives yell, “Ho!” as in the old Westerns. The Obamamas will think we are dissing (1) them, (2) Obama, (3) Mobama.
Which one of these two have you never heard of. Bain Capitol or Pol Pot. Let me know and I will explain.
When one looks around at what has happened to America already, and the degree to which the backward "forward" ideas have dimmed the light of liberty which once beamed its rays to oppressed people throughout the world, then Richter's pages take on new meaning.
Click on any of the segments and find something relevant to today's discussions.
Thanking You also!
Well said. If this was a firefight, the choice might be clearer to our fellow disappointed Conservatives. If a mortal enemy was closing in, it would be unacceptable for any of us to shoot at the trees just because we didn't like our standard bearer - the enemy would quickly have his bayonets in our bellies and we would have no future.
Our only choice is to fight or die. Either we fire our ballots against Obama, or we quit the field.
WTF = Way The Forward
It’s nonsensical enough that an “intellectual” should be able to make sense of it.