Posted on 05/02/2012 11:22:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Mitt Romney: Judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.
Here's the proof.
Listen to the eight minute audio HERE .
*Excerpted from May 1, 2012 America's Summit, Restore the Republic call
The true patriot, in the mold of the father of our country, simply does the right thing, and trusts God with the results.
"If, to please the people, we offer what we ourselves disprove, how can we afterwards defend our work? Let us raise a standard to which the wise and the honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God."
I think George Washington would join the right battles and fight to remove the current regime to save the republic - and afterwards be most able to defend his work.
What sort of questions are those? Are you seriously suggesting that we stand pat and do nothing while Socialists on both sides of the aisle systematically dismantle our constitutional republic?
Are you really so well indoctrinated that you can't even think with the idea of fighting back against forces which are attempting to take every freedom away from you?
I can't believe we're even having this conversation.
So, you think George Washington would support a candidate for public office who banned guns, the exact sort of weapons the British were trying to grab at Lexington and Concord.
You think he would support a man who has supported the killing of helpless little babies for more than forty years. More than fifty million so far.
You think he would support a man who violated his own state’s constitution and instituted sodomite “marriage.”
You think he would support a man who completely homosexualized his state’s government and the public schools.
You think he would support a man who thinks government’s legitimate reach is so long that it can control the practice of medicine.
Simply not credible.
I don’t think if the marxist regime wins, Washington would defend his actions with:
“I voted for Tom, Obama was God’s will.”
Nope.
I don’t think if the marxist regime wins, Washington would defend his actions with:
“I voted for Tom, Obama was God’s will.”
Nope.
Questions you won't or can't answer, apparently.
Is it really that hard to ask you what the outcome is that you expect from your actions?
Your question is juvenile, but I'll humor you by providing the obvious answer.
The intended result of resistance is survival, in some form or other. In the case of punching a bully in the nose, you gain freedom from his depredations. The expectations of a people who stand together and refuse the depredations of an encroaching, oppressive government, are no different.
It’s impossible to match up what you’re saying with Washington’s words - words that were thoroughly lived out in all his actions throughout his entire public life.
By the way, at this point this isn’t about me, or about Obama, or Romney, per se.
This is now about whether or not those who call themselves conservatives in this country have any principles left that they won’t sacrifice on the altar of perceived political expediency.
I feel the same way about you using his words to support your campaign against the regime's opponent.
Washington would fight against Obama and his regime.
Can't tell that by your recent article posting.
This is now about whether or not those who call themselves conservatives…
Horse hockey. It's a fight to determine whether the progressive left remains in power. No matter what you call yourself, you're either joining with others who are in it to win it or out of the fight, playing in some other reality.
But I am fighting against Obama and his regime. Have been for years.
Why can't Romney Republicans type an honest sentence?
Romney, on the other hand, is not fighting Obama, he wants to be Obama. He has no problem with Obama's socialism. He simply thinks he can do socialism better. Which is probably true in many ways.
He's not offering any actual choice for anyone for whom a socialist of any stripe is not acceptable.
Indeed. You simply won't face up to the reality of the fact that Mitt Romney IS the progressive left.
No, you’re fighting Obama’s opponent.
There are two fighters in the ring and you’re here trying to knock one of them down - the wrong one.
If you haven't watched this before, please watch it now. If you have, please watch it again. Particularly the end.
Wow, amazing how blithely you disenfranchise everyone but the supporters of the Democrat and the Republican socialists.
Didn’t you say just a minute ago that we’re fighting progressivism?
Which is it? Is this some sort of a personal duel between two liberal politicians, or an attempt to put America back on its principled, constitutional footings, before it’s too late?
Well, in that particular ring, with Romney and Obama, it's more like professional wrestling. Completely fake.
Let's see...hmmm...
"Gay" "marriage." Check.
Homosexuality forced into every corner of state government and the public schools. Check.
Socialized medicine. Check.
$50 co-pay abortions. Check.
Permanent gun ban. Check.
Churches forced to accept policies they find abominable. Check.
Left-wing judicial appointments.
What is it that you don't understand about Romney's record?
You know I cannot respond to your litany without risking being banned.
But I can ask you a question:
When do you intend, in your quest for the presidency, to stop campaigning against Romney and start campaigning against Obama?
Never?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.