Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann to Endorse Romney
National Review ^ | Wednesday May 2, 2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 05/02/2012 2:24:25 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

National Review Online has confirmed that Michele Bachmann will endorse Mitt Romney tomorrow at a campaign event in Virginia.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2012endorsements; 2012swingstates; 58fosterkids; bachmann; bachmann4romney; backstabbing; election2012; endorsements; imataxattorney; kenyanbornmuzzie; michelebachmann; minnesota; mittromney; romney; stalkinghorse; va2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300 ... 501-547 next last
To: nutmeg

Well, if you want to “sit home,” that’s your right. I won’t be.

Good night.


201 posted on 05/02/2012 11:14:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

As with all political animals,they have to play the game rigged for them to play by the Ruling Class if they want to have a spot in the party they still cling to in vain as an ‘opposition party’ to the Democrats.

Neither Bachman, Cain, Santorum, Newt or Perry are “commie-pinkos’ because they endorsed the Ruling Class pick. They know they have to play by the Ruling Class rules if they want to even have a chance to play the game.

The rest of us however, do not have to play the Game.

We do not have to allow ourselves to be boxed into a corner and force-fed a Ruling Class nominee chosen by Obama, the GOP-e and the Media to lose to Obama in November.

And to hedge their bets that the fundamental transformation of the country will continue unabated, if by some miracle Romney actually wins.... nothing changes and everything Obama has already done becomes permanent and endorsed with the Ruling Class sitting in the cat bird seat with their paws on our money.

End game. The Ruling Class oligarchy in league with the MarxoFascists have played their game well, and we as citizens do not have to play their game at all.

Political animals, well... they will still play the game.

But we don’t have to, and I refuse to knuckle under and vote for the Candidate Obama and the enemy chose to run against.


202 posted on 05/02/2012 11:16:32 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Well, if you want to “sit home,” that’s your right. I won’t be.

I NEVER "sit home" on any election day, local, national or otherwise. I've never missed an election since I was of legal voting age.

LOL, I guess you don't recognize sarcasm.

I will be voting AGAINST Obama on November 6th. His only viable opponent - like it or not - looks to be Romney.

If you want to write in Newt or Sarah Palin or whoever, go ahead.

203 posted on 05/02/2012 11:20:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Gosh, for someone who says they don’t care what I do, you sure seem to care what I do.


204 posted on 05/02/2012 11:24:51 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I'm voting for the "NOT A COMMUNIST" candidate.

That's who I'll be voting for as well, ohioWfan, the "Not A Communist" candidate! :-)

205 posted on 05/02/2012 11:26:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'm still chuckling that you didn't get the sarcasm in my post #200.

Actually I'm kind of... in awe. I'm in awe of a lot of strange stuff I see posted on FR these days. I don't even recognize this place anymore.

206 posted on 05/02/2012 11:37:09 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Actually, I’ve clearly seen the sarcasm in all of your posts to me this evening. And it’s quite ineffective in convincing me to support a socialist out of abject fear of a different socialist.


207 posted on 05/02/2012 11:39:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You’re seeing things, pal. My only “sarcastic” post to you was in #200.


208 posted on 05/02/2012 11:44:39 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Actually I'm kind of... in awe. I'm in awe of a lot of strange stuff I see posted on FR these days. I don't even recognize this place anymore.

It's the inevitable turmoil associated with the death throes of a once-great political party.

209 posted on 05/02/2012 11:45:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Nah. Your posts have dripped with it. And the Romney Republican memes that continually, dishonestly, claim that principled conservatives are going to “sit home,” or that they support Obama.


210 posted on 05/02/2012 11:51:10 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

She was a stalking horse. How about “Sarah is my friend” but allows Ed Rollins to attack her and then only after many days say that Ed was wrong. Plus she hardly hit Mitt except for a few times in the debates when he was clearly the Establishment frontrunner as the non-Romneys rise and fell

Not everyone does what Reagan did! Don’t speak ill of your fellow republicans!


211 posted on 05/02/2012 11:54:17 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

OK, “principled conservative”... who will you be voting for for president on Tuesday, November 6th?


212 posted on 05/02/2012 11:57:47 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Myself.


213 posted on 05/03/2012 12:00:38 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
ROTFL! Good luck with that.

Good night.

214 posted on 05/03/2012 12:09:28 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

I don’t believe in luck.

Good night.


215 posted on 05/03/2012 12:15:16 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
It's not how long you were here , so please don't throw up the sign in date - it means NOTHING! And, it's not about you, personally. This is a conservative site and you are pumping a liberal candidate and one who is against everything that represents GOD/FAMILY/COUNTRY. And you give me a sign up date for what? Credibility?

if Mitt breaks the 1,144 delegate threshold, he will have won the nomination

TRY to remember how he got there. Most here do! So please stop - he WON nothing - It was GIVEN and BOUGHT. His LIES Attacks Attacks LIES - not to Newt's face - the coward that he is - but with paid advertising daily and his media support and with DRUDGE REPORT bloody Thursday on NEWT got him there. He is more of a thief than a winner! "The thief has come to kill/rob/destroy". Fits mitt to a 'T'.

Were you sleeping through all of this? He has nothing to run on - NOTHING, so he needed to tear down a Patriot, conservative Newt like he did with Sarah, also, conservatives that do have credentials and excellent records. His dirty tactics are KNOWN but they have no limit!

Remember, he has NOT been vetted yet! Obama will take care of that since you/others would rather ignore it.

His dirty tactics are KNOWN and they have no limit! Conservatives will never forget the pre-planned Bloody Thursday and he can't do that to Barry. So then what is slick mitt the backstabber going to do then?? oops, I was just counting on everyone just voting for me? DREAM ON!!

Evil knows no bounds and Romney is one EVIL SOB. Remember he's a backstabber, so it would never surprise if he's not a pawn of the left to keep Barry in office.

216 posted on 05/03/2012 12:19:21 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I don’t believe in luck.

Oh you're gonna need a lot of it if you actually think you're going to be elected President in November.

217 posted on 05/03/2012 12:20:14 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Our motto is George Washington's:

"If, to please the people, we offer what we ourselves disprove, how can we afterwards defend our work? Let us raise a standard to which the wise and the honest can repair. The event is in the hand of God."

SelfGovernment.US

218 posted on 05/03/2012 12:26:03 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

You and others like you are pathetic little turds for your infantile attacks against good people. Stop attacking Jeff Head. This man has served in the military for this great nation(something alot of you armchair general cowards never have), he has been a long time conservative poster here, has written excellent books on the rise of china and the challenge to American dominance, and the man is battling a serious illness. The man knows military hardware and nations strategic force posture, and is the best source for it on FR or pretty much any other forum. People like him dont deserved to be flamed by losers like yourself. This site has gone mad. Zot me if you wish powers that be, but this is over the line.


219 posted on 05/03/2012 12:32:59 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Is Jeff Romney, you dweb!

You are one who has gone mad! And too thin skinned in your protection over POS mitt. This isn’t your audience, mittbot - hang out in a liberal site for a while.


220 posted on 05/03/2012 12:48:49 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Another good quote. And I'll highlight this The event is in the hand of God.

That's where I stand - do what I know is right and the rest is up to Him. And not to be shaken by what I see because HE sees ALL.

Thanks. It's a good message to close with.

221 posted on 05/03/2012 12:57:49 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; EternalVigilance
His only viable opponent

Viable? What in the world makes you think Romney is viable?

Do you REALLY think a pro-choice Mormon is gonna get votes from the Christian Right?

When is the last time that a YANKEE Republican got the Southren vote?

222 posted on 05/03/2012 1:28:55 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Hey,why not vote for George Washington? He can do a better job dead than Obama or Romney can alive.


223 posted on 05/03/2012 2:50:01 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

No. Not of Romney.


224 posted on 05/03/2012 4:03:51 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

BUMP


225 posted on 05/03/2012 4:26:46 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Good to hear there are still some ‘thinking’ and honorable conservatives left!!

And not like those who are clueless and putty in the hands by dishonorable deceitful ones to be lead astray into the hands of liberals - Mitt used them, also, to put him in office. They would NOT listen but instead mocked true conservatives because of their stupidity.

Untrue, don't set your standard up for defining true conservative. Most true conservatives will be voting for Romney.

However the anti Romney cult, of which you are obviously a member, won't.

That does't make you a true conservative.

It makes you a true _______

The blank is left open to your imagination.

226 posted on 05/03/2012 4:35:22 AM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; Bigtigermike; Jim Robinson; All
In what way was this "Sarah" involved in ANYTHING?


227 posted on 05/03/2012 5:12:25 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

So.. you’ve learned to post pictures? Well bless your little heart.


228 posted on 05/03/2012 5:14:28 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Bigtigermike; Lazlo in PA; DallasSun; joesbucks; humblegunner; RitaOK; dfwgator; ...
Tigerseye: You can smugly vote for socialism and claim you did all you could while our country goes down the drain.

Neither voting for socialism nor smug nor happy about the s(h)ituation we find ourselves in. Ok. Let's play your metaphor.

The drain (Republic, Economy, etc) is plugged. We had the chance to nominate our best guy, an hnest conservative plumber early on to fix the mess. Instead we kept pushing competitive bidding among them until all the little guys couldn't afford to continue. But the big corporate Mr RINO-Rooter conglomerate in town held out because they have the cash and the discipline and is now the only game in town.

Now there's also a Commie from the City Waste dept who is offering to come out and have "his people" destroy your house and remove all your plumbing and give you free chamber-pots and a wheelbarrow and a shovel.

So you can choose to run off into the woods to get away from the smell. But until we can get some honest plumbers back in the business (the ones this time turned out to be shams didn't they?**) then we merely have the choice of how long we can clear the drains until the next clog (4 years?)....or completely turn our house into a third world cesspool for the next century.

** Which one of these two-faced "conservative" suckups who are now not just caving, but supporting the RINO did we want to be our "principled" leader?

229 posted on 05/03/2012 5:20:37 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Now THAT’S funny right there.. I don’t care WHO ya are!


230 posted on 05/03/2012 5:23:52 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

If American conservatives want real political influence they must drop the habit of endorsing RINOs against the Democrats.

Otherwise will have RINOs only at the helm of power, and the conservative TV show during primaries that does nothing but damage to the conservative movement.

Learn from Marine Le Pen: grow your own party.


231 posted on 05/03/2012 5:29:58 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun
What you are saying is if we do not agree with you we are wrong. You are being rude to people simply because they have a different opinion than you. You do not see how arrogant that is?

What I am saying is pretty clear. I do not respect your opinion on this. I do not respect a decision to vote for Obama, nor can I respect a person who enables him. I also do not respect a person who believes in Islam. I do not respect a single Occupy Wall Street person. I do not respect Bill Ayers, Eric Holder, Elizabeth Warren or Ahmadinejad or Barack Obama.

You are entitiled to your opinion, as I am entitled to mine.

You are NOT entitled to be respected for your decision.

Obama voters will respect you for withholding your vote, they will even admire you and applaud you.

So you needn't worry about my opinion of you. You've got lots of support. Good for you.

232 posted on 05/03/2012 5:30:31 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I’m with you.


233 posted on 05/03/2012 5:34:12 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Learn from Marine Le Pen: grow your own party.

It's Jean-Marie. Not Marine. Yeah, why don't YOU learn something from Le Pen. Formed "his own" party in NINETEEN SEVENTY TWO.

And what did he do? Corral all the far right wing away from politics giving France 40 years of left vs. ultra-left debates.

And we don't have proportional coalition governments....and frankly...if your attitude prevailed in France, they couldn't have coalition governments there either because you would never form common cause with the "not right enough" people to get anything passed.

234 posted on 05/03/2012 5:36:13 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

I only hope this petulance will wane. The intellectual shock of having supported a “principled conservative” as some kind of “we are the resistance” movement...to then have Newt or Bachmann or Palin or whatever dream candidate turn around and support the guy and the establishment you thought was evil incarnate?

That’s got to take a while to right your head. I don’t trust any of these charlatans. That makes reality easier to take when it hits.


235 posted on 05/03/2012 5:40:11 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

RE: We all knew it didn’t we? She was a STALKING HORSE.

Yup


236 posted on 05/03/2012 5:42:47 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike; Lazlo in PA; DallasSun; sam_paine; NoLibZone; Christie at the beach; Longbow1969; ...
Please, guys... we all know that any elected official or major candidate who wants to stay in Republican politics at the big league levels is going to endorse Mitt Romney. The last time major Republicans opposed the Republican nominee after the convention and got away with it was in 1964, when Romney's father was among many others who opposed Goldwater.

Those of us who are not in elected office have more freedom.

Let's face it: Romney beat us. Gingrich, Santorum, Cain, Perry, and Bachmann supporters all have more in common with each other than any of us have with Romney, and now we have virtually the worst possible Republican candidate because we couldn't unify behind a single candidate. We need to stop beating each other up and trying to work to put the conservative movement back together if, as seems likely, Romney loses this fall.

Let's not bash each other when we're going to have to find a way to work together after November.

A word to the people who opposed Rick Santorum: Xzins is correct when he says that “All of the pro-life conservatives EXCEPT Santorum have now endorsed Romney. Rick, the GOP-e won’t like you if you don’t get with the program and back the Massachusetts $50 babykiller.”

I am all but certain that Santorum will eventually endorse Romney and will be both very shocked and very happy if he doesn't, but as of today, the guy some people liked to attack as a stalking horse for Romney is the last one left **NOT** to endorse him.

Think about that.

237 posted on 05/03/2012 5:44:29 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
** Which one of these two-faced "conservative" suckups who are now not just caving, but supporting the RINO did we want to be our "principled" leader?

As I wrote earlier, political animals have to play the game the Ruling Class sets as their rules and kiss the bungholes and lick the palms of those Masters if they want have a seat at their table.

We citizens do not have to play that game, because it is our votes and money they needed to keep themselves in perpetual power.

Soon however, they will have no need for either from us, because they know what the transformation is going to be, and they decided to play along for power's sake and a crack at all our redistributed money.

So they rigged this election to be a win, win for themselves by getting rid of the 'ball and chain of Conservatives'.

I won't play their game by their rules and hold my nose for the trap they set for me. But then, I'm not a political animal either and I am not beholden to them.

238 posted on 05/03/2012 5:45:31 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Whats going to be hilarious are going to be the posts when Palin endorses Romney, because she knows Obama is the worst possible outcome. I wonder if she will be called whore and RINO etc. I agree with you. I dont trust any politicians either, any of them. However, I know which one is worse for the country and plans to damage it as much as possible for his twisted marxist ideology and that is Obama. Like I said in a previous post that folks overlooked and never commented on. They are a reason that russia and china endorse Obama for four more years. They love the “flexibility” with our national defense. Only a fool would not see that.


239 posted on 05/03/2012 5:46:11 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

I’ve said all along that they will all endorse Romney at some point. Its just the way things are done.

Duncan Hunter endorsed McCain on a promise then later retracted saying that McCain had broken the promise. However Hunter was leaving politics after that race anyway.


240 posted on 05/03/2012 5:48:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; ConservativeMind; Bigtigermike; Al B.; sarah fan UK; Sarah Barracuda
It's amazing how short many people's memories are concerning the context and circumstances of Bachmann's decision to run for president in January 2011.

To refresh those memories, let me recount what happened (once again):

After the 2010 TEA Party sweep of the House of Representatives and State legislatures, with Palin leading the charge, the GOP-E panicked and launched a strategy to undermine and ultimately stop her from running for president. They admitted it openly.

And since Bachmann was a pain in Boehner's butt too at the time (particularly with her TEA Party rally on the steps of Capitol Hill), the GOP-E/RNC hatched a plan to try and kill two birds with one stone by convincing Bachmann to run (via her congressional staff) and dilute Palin's TEA Party support. They approached her over the Christmas adjournment (again via her staff) and she agreed in exchange for whatever promise they made to her. Within days, members of her staff appeared in both Iowa and South Carolina and began bad mouthing Palin to state and local Republican chairmen and potential delegates.

Very soon afterward, Bachmann announced her candidacy, but word leaked about what was going on and was documented and discussed ad nauseum both here at FR and elsewhere in the Conservative blogosphere. Bachmann then hired Ed Rollins as her manager and literally within twenty-four hours he attacked, not Romney, but Palin. Bachmann's subsequent silence spoke volumes. Again, this was all discussed and debated on this forum and elsewhere.

In the meantime, Tucson happened, and Palin was crucified by Obama's minions online and in the MSM. The GOP-E saw another big chance to help bury her, and did not lift a finger to either defend or help her, leaving her to dangle in the wind against the vicious Rat onslaught. Palin released her own video statement about Tucson and was again attacked mercilessly for defending herself. She went on to do the Madison rally and then her One Nation bus tour, but something (bad?) happened behind the scenes in late August or early September (when she was primed to announce her candidacy) that compelled her to stay out, and she told mark Levin on October 5 that she was not running.

Bachmann, for her part, ran a fitful campaign and not once attacked Romney during the "debates" (if you can call them that) before suspending it on January 4th of this year, her job done.

It's sad that I have to walk people through this all over again, but apparently I do.

241 posted on 05/03/2012 5:48:57 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Thanks for the concise recap.

Bookmarked for reference.


242 posted on 05/03/2012 5:52:44 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I have lived long and expected it..I am a realist..My guys did not make it through the primary..It hurt..
I painfully accept that there’s only one way to get Zero out of the White House..and that’s to vote for the man left standing. I want Obama OUT!


243 posted on 05/03/2012 6:06:53 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Cripplecreek wrote: "I’ve said all along that they will all endorse Romney at some point. Its just the way things are done."

Yep, we agree.

To bash politicians because they endorse the nominee of their party doesn't make sense.

Those of us who are not elected officials or major national political figures have more options.

244 posted on 05/03/2012 6:08:34 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

I’ve talked to my congressman extensively about his endorsement of Romney. All he says is “I’m a second time freshman and if I’m reelected I’ll have more freedom”


245 posted on 05/03/2012 6:14:12 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I agree with everything that you are saying and its accurate as well


246 posted on 05/03/2012 6:17:58 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME; presently no screen name; greyfoxx39

You and others like you are pathetic little turds for your infantile attacks against good people.

- - - - - -
Oh that IS ironic. Attacking good freepers with infantile attacks.

And where were you when Jeff Head was calling other, conservative Freepers Nazis.

Hypocrite.


247 posted on 05/03/2012 6:30:11 AM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Don’t forget the co-religionist factor. It is strong with that group.


248 posted on 05/03/2012 6:31:05 AM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

And so Aaron, where is Moses and his God? Come let us make ourselves a golden calf and worship at the feet of Ba’al.

And with that request, the Israelites stripped themselves of their gold and ripped the earrings from their daughters ears.


249 posted on 05/03/2012 6:35:12 AM PDT by EBH (The redistribution of another man's money, does not create wealth for the "greater good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Friend, you are right on target. I actually discount all the blabber, hate, dislike, bad mouthing on this site by Freepers, etc. against Mitt Romney. I always thought this wonderful site was the vioce of conservatism, freedom, liberty and individual effort. To me, there is no difference between the hate and venom of the left or the right, period.

The good news is, these folks that spew hate on this site are in reality, a distinct and tiny minority and mean absolutely nothing in the upcoming election. This real issue in my mind is not Mitt Romney. It is Barack Hussein Obama. Simple, Obama must be defeated for many clearly obvious reasons. End of story. ABO!!!


250 posted on 05/03/2012 6:39:07 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (My only objective is defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 151-200201-250251-300 ... 501-547 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson