Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bachmann to Endorse Romney
National Review ^ | Wednesday May 2, 2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 05/02/2012 2:24:25 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 501-547 next last
To: ConservativeMind

You obviously were not paying attention to what she was doing earlier.

She made it clear that she was a destroyer, and that the only reason she was “running” was her jealousy of Palin.

She has also made it easy for her opposition to knock her out of congress now. Shame IMO.
.


151 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:09 PM PDT by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
So everyone who wants Obama out of office is a 'sell out.'

Good luck with that.....

152 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:22 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; wagglebee; BlackElk; Steve Schulin; joanie-f

I and some others figured out several years ago that the Republican Party is almost completely bereft of moral leadership.

Others are finally catching on.

The evidence is so overwhelming now that you have to shut your eyes to the truth to not see it.


153 posted on 05/02/2012 8:10:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Sorry, I don’t vote for pro-choice democrats.

The only actual pro-choice democRAT on the 2012 presidential ticket is Obama.

Go ahead, waste your precious vote in November. I really don't care.

Although Romney absolutely wasn't my choice to be the GOP presidential nominee, the choice is crystal clear to me. I refuse to vote (or vote indirectly via write-in or 'third party vote') for the far-left "social justice" Marxist punk to get another 4 years in order to completely destroy this country. He's done far enough damage already.

154 posted on 05/02/2012 8:11:40 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Another RINO, turncoat, commie-pinko, traitor, right, Romney haters?


155 posted on 05/02/2012 8:11:40 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

More likely, you have’t the capacity to debate.


156 posted on 05/02/2012 8:14:11 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Obama has to go, and Romney is the only bridge we’ve got.

There is no bridge...it went down already...Romney and the Gop took it down. The foundations is gone...there is nothing solid to build on.

You are under an Illusion: .....something that deceives by producing a false or misleading impression of reality..... the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension......an instance of being deceived.... that represents what is perceived in a way different from the way it is in reality.

What Romney, and Obama, and the Parties are building as nothing to do with the American people apart from the revenues we generate into their pockets to make a clear path for distributing that wealth where ever they determine...abroad. That's the bridge....that's the destination of both parties.

157 posted on 05/02/2012 8:16:39 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
The only prayer this country has is that this is all internet bluster, or that this is such a tiny minority that they won't make any difference in November.

If we don't get rid of Obama this country is OVER.

And all the egotism and anonymous chutzpah in the world won't bring it back to us.

I heard Glenn Beck yesterday morning, and they were all kidding around, but Pat said that even if Romney ground up kittens and used them for fuel, he would vote for him............BECAUSE HE'S NOT A COMMUNIST!!!!

No matter what anyone says, Pat is right. I'm voting for the "NOT A COMMUNIST" candidate.

158 posted on 05/02/2012 8:16:39 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

So everyone who wants Obama out of office is a ‘sell out.’

- - - - -
No, everyone who supports RINO Romney is a sell out.

I want Obama out of office as well, but Romney (the Pale Obama) isn’t the answer.


159 posted on 05/02/2012 8:16:51 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

BINGO!


160 posted on 05/02/2012 8:19:24 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

161 posted on 05/02/2012 8:19:24 PM PDT by inkfarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
He's the only viable candidate running, and the only possibility of a stop gap measure to save the country.

That isn't 'supporting' Romney. It's trying to save the country from immediate and permanent destruction by a dangerous, Marxist regime that has already made this beloved country of ours unrecognizable.

162 posted on 05/02/2012 8:19:42 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: caww

This Romney thing is turning into a cult - same patterns.


163 posted on 05/02/2012 8:20:52 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Just so you know...Newt has not endorsed Romney. Though the media is cleaverly implying as much. He did not do so.


164 posted on 05/02/2012 8:22:14 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; Jim Robinson

>> “Which Palin IS going to do - just like Perry, Bachmann, Newt, Santorum, Cain and pretty much every other Republican.” <<

.
Palin will endorse when we have a nominee, no sooner. She has made that clear.

>> “ The meltdown here is going to be epic” <<

.
Your wish since you mistakenly arrived here.

There will be no melt.

I’ve been here since the summer of ‘97, and have been aware from the first day that the site attracted trolls like you, but has a natural strength, borne of the strength of Jim’s committment.

I’d like to predict that your zot flare will be especially green and sulphurous, bringing joy to all here. Keep on goading.
.


165 posted on 05/02/2012 8:23:59 PM PDT by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
The only actual pro-choice democRAT on the 2012 presidential ticket is Obama.

Nah. To this day Romney's positions and policies deny the God-given nature of rights. He thinks certain classes of human beings can have their most important rights stripped away by a democratic vote.

He's a pro-choice democrat, by definition.

166 posted on 05/02/2012 8:24:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism: Leave your principles by the door. You won't be needing them any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

He isn’t viable at all, that is an delusion. Obama will destroy him in the general.

Romney will destroy this country with a smile on his creepy face, same as Obama. He is a total lying scumbag and I will stand on my principles.


167 posted on 05/02/2012 8:24:48 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

So everyone who wants Obama out of office is a ‘sell out.’


Yup. Getting more and more obvious every day. Never saw so many obama supporters in here, before. Well, they will get their wish, and he will get another 4 years. Then they will be happy.


168 posted on 05/02/2012 8:26:59 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

...but now she openly supports a candidate who stands by government mandates and socialized medicine? And you don’t think money or political favor has anything to do with it?

I think she has played you for a fool. They are all phonys and frauds...just to varying degrees. That doesn’t mean you can’t like them....just don’t be naive.


169 posted on 05/02/2012 8:28:02 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
getting rid of Obama, and that's obviously the decision Bachmann has made. To stand for America's survival.

No..it's simply standing with the party which is what candidates do regardless what they know is truth about their once opponet. It's "Their Party"...it certainly isn't ours...

They will stand with their own, they all said as much from the get go. Nobody should be surprised and nobody should be trying to add any reasons why they do so other than it's what they do...every year..all the time.

170 posted on 05/02/2012 8:31:48 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

“If we don’t get rid of Obama this country is OVER.”

I guess I have more faith in our country than you do. Americans are never going to let one man or party completely take them down. Times may be rough, but in no way will the country be “over”.

Your melodrama sounds like Alec Baldwin when he was whining and threatening to leave if Bush were elected.

Face it. Romney is going to lose. No one can win an election when a significant portion of their base says they will “have to hold their nose” to vote for him. Without a motivated fired up base, the only thing that is “over” is this election.


171 posted on 05/02/2012 8:38:05 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
If we don't get rid of Obama this country is OVER.

..and what makes you think it's not now? Do you honestly think Romney's going to stop this trajectory? and how. He has no plans because the plans are laid out for him...the script continues...he's just like Obama...does what he is told.......and what they're both being told is not good for this country or it's people. They are both on the same page in that respect.

As for Glen Beck...he's been in Romney's court from the get go....everybody knows that. ..and the informed knew that before the Primary.

172 posted on 05/02/2012 8:38:48 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

So what is the answer to getting Obama out of office?


173 posted on 05/02/2012 8:46:33 PM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Cain and Perry already have. Santorum and Newt are getting close.

Once Romney passes the 1,144 delgeat threshold, the others will endorse and campaign for him.

Newt, Santorum, Palin, Bachman, Cain, Perry, etc. will do so because despite the differences, despite his dealing as Governor in Mass...he is running on firm commitments now that if accomplished will turn this nation around. They all know he will be orders of magnitude better than Obama...and particularly if we can deliver a House and Senate.

I expect, once he passes that delegate count and officially becomes the nominee, that most folks will coalese behind him...even if (like with me) he was not our choice. For me it was Sarah, Cain, Santorum and Newt.

I pray we can defeat Obama and use our own influence, multiplied by millions, to help turn our nation away from the catastrophe.


174 posted on 05/02/2012 8:47:51 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: caww

No. Glenn Beck was for Rick Santorum, since Iowa. I think the only attention that Beck has given Romney is the t-shirt which says ‘Romney. At least he isn’t a commie.’ in my book that is damning with faint praise.


175 posted on 05/02/2012 8:50:00 PM PDT by Utah Girl (John 15:12, Matthew 5:44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
Yes...it's mass hysteria and it's building...very similar to the hyoe when Obama ran.....which should be a heads up to people....this time it's ‘Fear driven’ which is especially dangerous.... and it's being pushed hard and heavy across the Internet by Romney supporters. This type of fear is not of God....

Like Obama Romney can't run on his record because he never tells the truth.....his truth changes in whatever political winds that will carry him....and in some respects makes him worse than Obama because his basic agenda is the same...he's just coloring in the picture with his choice of colors...the picture won't change. We know Obama is bad all over....Romney's mask is firmly in place....

I won't be voting for Romney....First election I haven't voted for a President and that I do mourn...but I cannot get behind the agenda's these two are pushing and won't be a part of it...to do otherwise is treason against my country , and a huge dishonor to God.

“....Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering ‘his vote’ that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country...”

Samuel Adams

176 posted on 05/02/2012 8:52:35 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: inkfarmer

LOL! Great cartoon.


177 posted on 05/02/2012 8:55:39 PM PDT by Utah Girl (John 15:12, Matthew 5:44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Well, based on some FReeper purists, she no longer has a seat on the conservative wagon. I wonder how many of those same purists ridiculed her during her run and called her too conservative, crazy, a nut, etc.

This is not to say I’m supporting Romney. I’m on the fence with him, but that said, I can understand why conservative politicians and conservatives are supporting him as an alternative to Obama.


178 posted on 05/02/2012 8:55:49 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Woo hoo! Another moderate candidate! Thanks GOP and voters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Or National Elvis Historian.


179 posted on 05/02/2012 9:00:08 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats are dangerous and evil. Republicans are just useless and useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Glen projected that he was for Santorum because he knew to support Romney would be associated immediately with his affiliation in the LDS. Add additionally he's still trying to get his station etc. running strong...and by the way well supported by LDS. Beck was smart enough to know to play low profile....

All tv pundits and such will play their cards very carefully in an election. Their primary concern is their listening audience above and beyond the political tides that be. In Becks case it's been especially so for he's still considered the new kid on the block.

SAntorum's surge came because the media was doing what they were told which was to lift Santorum at that particular. Santorum was the GOPS guy when and if they would need him along the way. Rick's a player and always has been. That hasn't changed as we see him now holding out his delegates until his price is met....

180 posted on 05/02/2012 9:01:39 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

There is no debating with the clueless. Babble with liberals, your speed. Get lost, pretender.


181 posted on 05/02/2012 9:08:28 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: caww
Glen projected that he was for Santorum because he knew to support Romney would be associated immediately with his affiliation in the LDS.

It is all unsubstantiated conspiracies with you Newt people. Glenn just today laid into Milt for being terribly unreliable and unconvincing in his current beliefs. After reading your comments, you wouldn't know anything about that because you obviously don't listen.

182 posted on 05/02/2012 9:10:02 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Once Romney passes the 1,144 delgeat threshold, the others will endorse and campaign for him.

I don't think we'll see them campaigning as much for Romney as exposing Obama policies for what they are. They'll be crushing Obam with everything they can muster..... If you listen to them their comments are general in nature regarding Romney...there isn't much enthusiasm for him at all. ...and rightfully so.

It would be great if Romney did as your post indicates....but I cannot see that happening as Romney in the past does what he wants regardless....including bypassing government prodigal and rules as he did and showed he's capable of in Mass. as Governor.

I disagree they think he's far better than Obama....rather he's what they got and they will live with it and do as they can to steer him....if he can be steered by our guys which I have great reservations about...those who might oppose Romney will be few if he wins ..for the impression will be he's one of ours.... He's not.

183 posted on 05/02/2012 9:13:05 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell; Bigtigermike
I can understand why conservative politicians and conservatives are supporting him as an alternative

There is no understanding it, it just shows they weren't in politics for our country but themselves! Therefore, faux conservatives. The deal was made before Newt and Perry or any conservative entered the race or who they thought would enter the race. So, supporting him as an alternative, is FALSE! You really aren't too savvy.

184 posted on 05/02/2012 9:20:23 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

On the other hand, Cain abandoned Gingrich before he withdrew from the race, so I’m not sure he’s the best example.


185 posted on 05/02/2012 9:24:24 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Santorum didn’t endorse Romney. That was pretty good restraint, given how Newt Gingrich cost Santorum the small possibility that we could actually beat Romney. It’s not like Gingrich dropped out and endorsed Santorum when Santorum was beating Romney. At least Santorum dropped out and gave Gingrich a clear field — maybe just to prove that Gingrich couldn’t beat Romney one-on-one.

My point is that it is rediculous to attack Santorum in a thread about Bachmann endorsing Romney after Gingrich suspends his campaign.


186 posted on 05/02/2012 9:31:57 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: inkfarmer

Rotflol.....now that is funny...sad too...but I’m laughing my fanny off just the same...


187 posted on 05/02/2012 9:32:41 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I remember how, when Bachmann was starting to poll close to Romney, and was about to win the Iowa caucus, a small but vocal group of Freepers here decided to tear her down, part of the “destroy the other conservatives so Sarah Palin can enter the race” strategy.

While I would have loved to have Sarah Palin in the race, I had confidence that she could clear her own field, and it certainly didn’t help beat Romney to burn the village and run off all the conservative candidates. We needed to unite around the first guy or girl who showed they could beat Romney, instead the first two were targeted, and the 3rd only survived because Palin directly announced she wasn’t running, but he fell of his own accord.

That was of course all before the collective re-imagineering of Newt Gingrich as “the conservative we wanted all along”. For which Santorum was regularly attacked, again splitting the conservative vote through negative attacks, making it harder for the supporters of each candidate to join forces.

Don’t get me wrong — I don’t actually think individual actions like that were a deciding factor in anything; I do think that as a whole, conservatives were not focused on beating Romney at any cost, too many wanted what they thought was the perfect candidate.


188 posted on 05/02/2012 9:39:04 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GoldwaterChick

Preventing Romney from getting enough votes to get the nomination. This isn’t a done deal yet.

A contested convention is our only hope.


189 posted on 05/02/2012 9:44:39 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
When I see posts where it says 'what Sarah will do' - it already shows the poster is looking for credibility.

Sarah and Todd voted for NEWT!! Remember that - no one decent wants mitt. The not decent could be bought off and the clueless just go along - he didn't win anything he bought it. So don't use Sarah's name to give any credibility to mitt who is responsible for all the attacks against Sarah. His LIES, EVIL and rotten vile tactics against Sarah and all her family! He truly has a demonic spirit within him.

You are on a conservative site - so don't use 'we' when promoting your pro homo, pro baby killer LIAR candidate. Have some respect for decent people. Besides, that is such an over used political manipulative technique - to use it on conservatives is not wise but insulting when speaking of Romney.

190 posted on 05/02/2012 9:45:43 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I find this nauseating and I think you’re right. During this process I was in Bachmann’s corner, after she quit, I was on the so-called “Cain Train”, when that derailed, I voted for Newt after much soul-searching, but I still rooted for Santorum.

Never once did I consider voting for Mitt Trotsky or his boy-toy Ron Paul. I’m a Conservative and they’re not. It’s that simple.


191 posted on 05/02/2012 9:47:00 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Right Of You To Be You Is At Stake....Resist Cultural Marxism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Take you clueless rant and shove it. Sell your praise for mitt’s whore to someone else.

55 posted on May 2, 2012 4:27:49 PM PDT by presently no screen name

Go back to daily kos.


192 posted on 05/02/2012 9:47:15 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I trust Sarah Palin,Dick Cheney, Cain,Perry,Bachman Anyone but Obama,because I trust their judgment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: caww

but I cannot get behind the agenda’s these two are pushing and won’t be a part of it...to do otherwise is treason against my country , and a huge dishonor to God.

- - - -
exactly. I cannot wish them Godspeed, either of them (2 John 1:10-11) as they both support unbiblical practices and believe false gospels.


193 posted on 05/02/2012 9:50:38 PM PDT by reaganaut (I am a Christian first, a Conservative second and am out of the GOP if Romney gets in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Any Freeper that calls Michelle Bachmann a whore, is a DNC-Huffpo mole.


194 posted on 05/02/2012 9:51:32 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I trust Sarah Palin,Dick Cheney, Cain,Perry,Bachman Anyone but Obama,because I trust their judgment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Please!!!!!!! Bachmann hired Ed Rollins which was her first Hugh mistake and then after he quit, he dumped on Michele on CNN Anderson Cooper like we figured he would do. Then the next mistake was Rollins attacking Sarah publicly for no reason and it took days for Michele to respond which raised a lot of eyebrows if she considered Sarah “her friend”. After that Bachmann went on her bizzare Gardisol-affect infants thing which made people scratch their heads - all of this before Iowa.


195 posted on 05/02/2012 9:54:16 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Have some respect for decent people.

Rich, very rich. Coming from you, epic.

196 posted on 05/02/2012 9:54:37 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Well, I've been posting avidly here since 1998, and involved in many FR activities, was even humbled to be voted Freeper of the Year in 2001.

So I have a pretty good idea of what the site is all about.

I'll say it again...just for you. Sarah will endorse and support Romney for President should he be the nominee.

I supported Sarah, then Cain, Santorum, and Newt. I still hope there is some kind of miracle to get to a brokered convention.

But if it doesn't and if Mitt breaks the 1,144 delegate threshold, he will have won the omination. Not because he "bought" it, and not because most people are clueless...I have more faith in the GOP people voting in the primaries than that...it will be because, despite his record in Mass, he got the most votes all over the country and won the required number of delegates.

Sorry its that way...but it is, so deal with it.

IMHO, Romney will be far better for the country, even with his warts, than Obama, and that is precisely why the others will endorse him. Cain and Perry already have. Santorum and Newt will do so when he gets the delegates...and so will Sarah.

197 posted on 05/02/2012 10:20:54 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Not strange you were watching it with your own eyes and didn’t see it because you had a preconceive notion that blinded you and still is.

A real deal tea party member could have kicked mitt to the curb starting with the first debate EASILY, VERY EASILY unless they were there for his benefit.

She never attacked him, you watched it but only listened to her mouth and not watching what she DIDN’T do only what she did do.

Did you see Mitt’s record on taxes and unemployment in MA during his admin? She had tons of stuff to use - that a TRUE DEAL conservative had at their disposal - the liberals did their homework and later you will see what your ‘core’ candidate let pass. Perry tried addressing those things and she came along barking over Perry’s voice while mitt was denying, denying. Truly pitiful to watch.

She can try to clean herself up with this or that and given a pass with her supporters but now she’s just another pawn who the political world knows as ‘usable’.

With dirty politics there is always lots and lots of money - dirty money and not from your average hard working citizen. It’s needed to carrying out the task.

Dirty politics isn’t usually played by conservatives, that’s why so many were taken off guard. But it was a liberal, with no conservative ethics at all - that set up the deal at the weakness of those that were usable on what ‘they’ wanted so bad, is all that he needed to know to entice them into his web of deception. And in the political ego world, it’s easy to know.


198 posted on 05/02/2012 10:54:56 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

God bless ya....whoever you are....for zotting all that shameful posting

That was awful....just garbage posting

It makes us look like outlier nuts

Thank you.....


199 posted on 05/02/2012 11:10:19 PM PDT by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
So why don't we all sit home and pout on November 6th, and let Obama win by default? That'll show 'em!

I really don't care what you do or how you vote. For me, the choice is clear. Good night.

200 posted on 05/02/2012 11:12:40 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250 ... 501-547 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson