Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank discussion re our loss to Obama/Romney and the future direction of FR and tea party movement
Click here to pledge your support! ^ | May 4, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/04/2012 6:31:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

My FRiends, we might as well face the reality that we the combined pro-life conservative movement and tea party coalition have lost this round (the presidential election) in the larger battle to reclaim our constitution and our inalienable rights. Rove, Romney and the GOP-e have successfully destroyed and driven off each and every pro-life conservative tea party candidate from the race and all have surrendered to the Romney camp. It is no secret that Romney is not one of us. There is absolutely no doubt that he has never accomplished a single conservative thing in his entire political career (one term as liberal governor of liberal Massachusetts and six years campaigning for president). In Massachusetts, he undeniably championed abortion, gay rights, global warming, gun control, big government statist mandated/socialized health care programs, liberal judges, TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending, debt limit increases, etc, and even though he's recently claimed a complete reversal in political beliefs and no longer despises pro-life conservatives or the time of Reagan-Bush, I still don't trust him. He still stubbornly holds on to some of his statist beliefs, like global warming, gays in the military, RomneyCare, stimulus spending, etc, so there is no way I can vote for him or join Cain, Perry, Bachmann, Newt or any others who are endorsing him. But I will not act on my prior promises that I would actively campaign against him if he wins the nomination. Our combined movement is already torn and splintered and is going to have to be mended if we're going to have any impact whatsoever against the liberal/progressives and statists after the election. To that end I propose a TRUCE among our conservative forces during the remainder of this election cycle.

We conservatives have already lost the presidency to either the Dems or the GOP-e, and if we tear the tea party apart, if we tear the pro-life movement apart, if we tear FR apart then we lose it all. It's far more important that we re-unite and live to fight another day. Even if we can't vote for a true conservative for the presidency, it's doubly important that we all turn out on election day or sooner and drag our friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers, etc, to the polls to vote straight conservative for every slot on our ballots. The only way we can win our freedom back is to vote out the liberal progressives and vote in as many liberty loving conservatives as is humanly possible into every elected office at every level of government all across this great land. To prevent a total loss to the dems or GOP-e, we must continue the tea party rebellion into November and beyond. Whatever else you may do, you must turn out and vote straight tea party conservative down ticket!!

We must continue expanding our inroads into the state houses and into every elective office in the land. We must continue building on our majority in the house and we must retake the senate!! We must help the conservative governors and state legislatures to fully restore the ninth and tenth amendments and reclaim the real political power away from the federal usurpers and return it to the states and the people per the constitution!! This way, regardless of who wins the presidency, we can cut his unconstitutional expansionist movements off at the knees. And if any executive, civil officer or judge dares commit impeachable offenses, we must hold the majorities so we can impeach and remove them from office!!

And we must salvage and rebuild and continue strengthening our conservative pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-borders, pro-constitution, pro-small government, pro-defense, pro-liberty movements and our tea party coalition. And we must stop ripping each other apart!!

Therefore I hereby propose a general truce among our conservative forces!!

The Republic we save may be our own!!

As far as FR's finances go, we're in the same boat as the rest of the economy and will have to make do with what we can raise. Fortunately, the big debts we ran up a couple years ago have been paid off. We borrowed approx $20,000 a few years ago from two FReepers to fund our national convention, plus we ran up another $20,000 in legal fees during the last couple of years fighting off Righthaven. But those are now behind us and paid off. We also did quite a bit of traveling each year for the last three years on cross country tea party tours, but I think we can now cut that back and remove it from our budget requirements. If we're fortunate enough to not incur any additional legal costs or equipment costs (other than what we've already planned), and cut the travel and a few other areas, we should be able to tighten our belts enough to weather the storm even if we fail to reach our short term fundraising goals.

Whatever the outcome of the elections, we are prepared to roar into 2013 with the tea party chewing up liberal/progressives and RINOs and raising hell in our never ending fight for liberty!!

We are the resistance!!

Let's take the enemy head-on instead of fighting each other!!

Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; adminlectureseries; bachmann; cain; elections; freepathon; freerepublic; freerepublichistory; gingrich; gop; gope; jimrobinson; newt; obama; perry; prayer; romney; santorum; teaparty; truce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 601-650651-700701-750 ... 1,501-1,525 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Thanks, Jim. Your proposal of a truce should serve as a reminder to all of us to have better manners towards each other.

Our focus needs to be on the Principles that our Great Republic was founded on, and not on insulting each other.

As a guest here, I will try to improve and learn.


651 posted on 05/04/2012 12:23:43 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
You seem to think this is a republican website. It’s not. It’s a conservative website.

That may have changed today.

652 posted on 05/04/2012 12:24:22 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Imortant Alert:....."Be careful about ‘write in’ voting"......

....."I was told by a poll worker that if you ‘wrote-in’ anyone that didn't 'register in advance' as a ‘write-in candidate, it was a spoiled ballot and wouldn't be counted.

That protest ‘Donald Duck’ vote would cause your 'entire ballot to never be counted'..... That could void all your down ticket votes.

If in doubt of your state law/rules on write-in voting, leave that slot blank. An under vote won't spoil a ballot."

Re-posting this for those needing to be informed as it IS important they know what their state requires...and if or not their write-in counts...or they void the whole thing by a write if he's not registered in their state..

653 posted on 05/04/2012 12:24:37 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: Finny

If this was 1992, and there was a 3rd party candidate that had a significant fraction of the vote I would do as you say. But it’s not.

And that’s not the only thing informing my vote. I truly believe that the USG is about to “hit the wall” financially. I would prefer a Democrat to be in the drivers seat when that happens.

So Obama takes the blame, we teach the GOP a lesson about acceptable nominations, and a crack at a conservative in 2016 to rebuild the economy. Triple play.


654 posted on 05/04/2012 12:27:00 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Bigun
The facts are that the GOP has never won with a liberal candidate. And won't this time, either.

/johnny

655 posted on 05/04/2012 12:27:32 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


656 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:10 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


657 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:10 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


658 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:14 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: rockrr; EnglishCon
Nope. Let people search on their own. He knows what he said.

"A double-minded man is unstable in all he does".

659 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:19 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


660 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


661 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


662 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


663 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


664 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


665 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


666 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


667 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:30 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


668 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:29 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


669 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:41 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

What you said!


670 posted on 05/04/2012 12:28:45 PM PDT by billys kid (saying that there are too many children, is like saying that there are too many flowers Mother Tresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

DJ - I throw myself on you.

You stuck up for me on the abortion thread - for which I never thanked you though I should have.

If TBL was an antifreeper site, no way would I have signed up.

I just like to talk without the dramz. Yes, I lost my temper on a recent thread. Well, this thread.

If I may repeat - I am 57 years old. Not exactly a child. For the last few Thons, I have been told how to think. I ignored the Cain train stuff, but the Newt stuff I couldn’t ignore, as he was my preference.

No more.

I have a chid due in October and I am gonna be able to look her in the eye once she is old enough to understand politics. (yeah we are too old for a kid - tell me about it)

Sorry. I cannot risk Obama getting another term. Our child is estimated to be born about a week before your elections. My family takes priority.


671 posted on 05/04/2012 12:29:12 PM PDT by EnglishCon (When life gets too much to stand - kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m going to get up every morning, go to work, come home (when I’m not traveling), enjoy my family, eat dinner, check emails, read FR, read a book, watch some TV, go to bed, get up, go to work.... and like that.

I’ll continue to be a monthly donor to FR, will continue to contribute to individual conservative candidates, will speak up against what I know to be wrong.

When asked, I will march in the streets, carry a sign, scream, yell, shout, etc.

I will vote for a conservative each and every time I see one on the ballot.

I am absolutely certain there will be more conservatives on my ballot as the years go by.

We WILL take Our Nation back, one election at a time.


672 posted on 05/04/2012 12:30:25 PM PDT by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billys kid

What you said?


673 posted on 05/04/2012 12:31:26 PM PDT by Tau Food
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644
Sounds great at first glance, but detail by detail review reveals that this is simply Dr. Paul trying to garner the military vote.

* Make securing our borders the top national security priority.

This is a general statement that any candidate can say; notice that no specific proposals are made that will rid the nation of muslims and traffickers of humans and drugs. Also, there are enormous and growing financial ties between mideast terror/caliphate states and the narco-states of Central and South America, which offer easy access to the U.S. If we can't shut down the dollars flowing to Venezuela in exchange for oil (Citgo gas stations continue to enjoy legal U.S. business status (Hugo and Iran say "thanks for supporting us")), there is no way that the narco-terror-connection would not be enriched under a Dr. Paul administration. Are the Central and South American nations with us or against us ? Quite a complex picture. Think NAFTA, tractor trailers bringing tons of Mexican produce to U.S. markets, U.S. manufacturers building facilities in Mexico, etc. Illegal drugs continue to find their way to America - billions of dollars worth every year - despite the U.S. government's herculean efforts to stop them. Exactly how can a U.S. President, at this point, stop the out-of-control drug cartels that now are running rampant in Mexico ? Legalizing drugs would simply give them more power and money. Mr. Paul has this sort of zen-opposites-kind-of plan; somehow closing the border with Mexico, but legalizing drugs in the U.S. Basically, U.S. big business-big-government, through making practically every rogue-regime, tryannical, narco-state, terrorist-state and communist state a trading partner, has made modern technology available to them - and quite cheaply, without them having to invent or produce a single thing themselves. They can figure out how to put a bomb in their underwear to kill innocent people and sneak on an airplane, but they can't figure out how to be friendly and productive enough to feed themselves.

* Avoid long and expensive land wars that bankrupt our country by using constitutional means to capture or kill terrorist leaders who helped attack the U.S. and continue to plot further attacks.

Sounds great, but killing terrorist leaders is only a temporary setback for the overall war between islam and non-islamic civilization; it does not do anything to stop the creation of new terrorist leaders. They are created by the public speech and teachings of immams the world over, who continue to press home the ideas of hating Jews, Christians, atheists, etc. The hatred of Judeo-Christian civilization, America, Western Civilization and any sort of atheist can be heard every week at over 2,000 mosques inside the U.S.

* Guarantee our intelligence community’s efforts are directed toward legitimate threats and not spying on innocent Americans through unconstitutional power grabs like the Patriot Act.

I don't want the government to spy on innocent Americans, but I do want them to spy on the mosque a few miles from my house. I know that they are working towards a day when my State - and every other one - will be overrun with muslim politicians who plan on (and already are) instituting sharia law. islam should be banned in the U.S. as the treasonous operation that it is. Trouble is, without such banning, and without the ability to spy on them, those "nice people" continue to plot future attacks and send money to terror operations/nations. At the end of the day, law enforcement has always had the ability to gather information which indicts someone and then bring them up on charges if they see fit, and ultimately they must decide whether they will bring charges against innocent people who are simply political enemies (abusing their office) or whether they will only use the information they gain to bring charges against those who truly are breaking the law as far as they can tell. The enemy is now making use of our secure and mobile communications system, i.e., the cell phone - even disposable pre-paid phone cards. Terror plans can be securely transmitted via throway phone numbers. The ideal path, as I've said, would be to actually engage islam; we would not have to have the clandestine spying then. But since that's not politically going to happen very soon, again, we can't sit back and limit our own spying efforts. When spying starts targeting anything other than islam, or any other American-existential threat, then those targets need to be left alone. As it stands now, I am more concerned with foreign powers that try to break into my computer on a daily basis than American spying on me, then again, I am not plotting a terror attack and the spying would reveal material that would bore the spy to tears. Of great concern to me, as well, is Eric Holder's Justice department which is politicized to the point of criminality. Notice the issue is not the laws, but the fact that the Justice Department is ignoring them.

* End the nation-building that is draining troop morale, increasing our debt, and sacrificing lives with no end in sight.

Yes, I agree that military nation-building is not a good avenue, it's based on immediate-post-WWII thinking and most people are too young to remember WWII and today is a much different situation than that time. IMHO, the first thing to work on with so-called "backward" nations is morals and therefore missionaries should be the first ones in. The House hearing by Rep. Smith today on C-Span demonstrates that the call for improvements in the Chinese government's treatment of it's citizens is largely driven by Christians. We should not trade with a nation until it's morals are on solid ground, IMHO.

* Follow the Constitution by asking Congress to declare war before one is waged.

This would make the U.S. hang back far too long to be effective and history has demonstrated that this causes wars to be very long and costly in every way. Congress does not act quickly on complex political issues. And today, Congress is far more "bought off" by lobbyists than they were 200 years ago, so their focus is not on making stands on geo-political issues, but passing legislation desired by their key support groups. Consequently, all sorts of regional tyrant actions around the world would be happening with the U.S. on the sidelines. The present system - if the President actually follows it - gives the U.S. the flexibility to stomp on problems quickly if necessary without them becoming a domestic political football. Of course, if the President drags out the war for nation-building, and then defies Congress in keeping the war going, then the present system does not work well. We simply need to limit our Presidential frontrunner nominations to those who have the right mindset of just nipping things in the bud and not being weak, but balancing that with knowing when the military targets are destroyed, it's time to bring the military home. They're not a construction company, they're a destruction company.

* Only send our military into conflict with a clear mission and all the tools they need to complete the job – and then bring them home.

Yes, I agree. However, getting Congress to buy in to any cause of war other than a large-scale attack where thousands of Americans are killed in that one attack - simply does not happen. So this claim really means that only when there is a catastrophic attack would the Dr. Paul administration do anything. Little attacks, we'd just have to grin and bear them. We have allies that we're close with to varying degrees: Japan, Australia, some Europe, Western Europe, etc. If one of them gets hit with an all-out invasion from a large foe where we only have a few months warning of trouble, we would never get ourselves over there in time to be of any help. South Korea; they'd just be overrun. No more LG electronics, sorry, they're "owned" by the Chinese now. Ooops, I meant to say North Koreans.

* Ensure our veterans receive the care, benefits, and honors they have earned when they return.

Yes, every decent American wants that; I have not heard any candidate say they are against that.

* Revitalize the military for the 21st century by eliminating waste in a trillion-dollar military budget.

Yes, every decent American wants that; I have not heard any candidate say they are against that.

* Prevent the TSA from forcing Americans to either be groped or ogled just to travel on an airplane and ultimately abolish the unconstitutional agency.

Personally, I refuse to use commericial aviation because of this. However, what is his plan to keep alibaba off the plane ? If he does not say "profiling" then his plan will fail.

* Stop taking money from the middle class and the poor to give to rich dictators through foreign aid.

Sounds a bit progressive in terms of only speaking of middle class and poor - is that a nice little code for young people that he will continue to "tax the rich". Tax all at the same rate. As far as no foreign aid, I agree 100%. Other candidates who were reasonably conservative agreed with stopping so-called foreign aid. One has to realize that some of those dollars are sent back to the U.S. in the form of sales for U.S. companies that export, so there would be political lobbying pressure to overcome. This is why conservatives seek "pure" conservative candidates because they know political pressure must be overcome by a President with principles.
674 posted on 05/04/2012 12:33:09 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: delapaz

It’s as good an idea as any. Why not.


675 posted on 05/04/2012 12:33:09 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Until we are ready to march on the capitol and stay with the stated intention of reclaiming our government we are pissing in the wind.

We can occupy by circling the Capitol. We will never garner the support or the publicity needed otherwise. The status quo is being protected by the media and the ruling class in Washington.

Once we have a 100k plus teapartiers surrounding the Capitol with a organized relief effort in place so we can stay as long as it takes we will replace the OWS in the news.

We stand no chance by just talking on the Internet....we have to act.


676 posted on 05/04/2012 12:34:28 PM PDT by is_is (VP Dad of Sgt. G - My Hero - "Sleep Well America......Your Marines have your Back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

You seem to think this election is fantasy football.
It ain’t. It’s reality. You have to choose from the menu.
***No I do not.

Go to Pizza hut and order the fish. You get NOTHING.
***Your analogy is flawed. The GOP claims to be a conservative party, Romney claims to be a conservative. It’s like a fish restaurant that only sells processed tuna sandwiches, that’s how far off the path they have come. If I go to a fish restaurant and want to order fish but it turns out they’re pissing on my head and callin’ it rain, I ain’t playing that game any more.

Because fish ain’t on the menu.
***Sad but true in the GOP fish restaurant.


677 posted on 05/04/2012 12:34:37 PM PDT by Kevmo (Palin 2012. It's just me in the voting booth. 100% straight republican ticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: Finny
No problem.

I didn't know that until a couple years ago when I asked about any write-in’s that might be running in a local race.

The lady was nice enough to explain the state law on it.

I then kicked myself for the times in the past I had voided my entire ballot with a silly write-in protest vote.

I think it varies from state to state how it is handled.

678 posted on 05/04/2012 12:34:37 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon
DJ - I throw myself on you.

Ooooomph! ;-)

I was a Gingrich supporter too. You have to learn how to shrug it off.

I have a child due in October

Congratulations!!!! (sleepless nights, nappies, spit up......but!, hugs and kisses and little arms squeezing you in love and trust. enjoy it!)

679 posted on 05/04/2012 12:35:04 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I don’t know what kind of “truce” you are looking at, but I will continue to go after Romney when he is wrong, before and after he shakes the Etch a Sketch. I hope it doesn’t get me banned. If you put together some ground rules, I will live by them as this is your site, but I am not going to sing “Kumbaya” while Romney steers toward the cliff on the left. Just let me know what is in bounds and what is out of bounds... I will refrain from commets on the presidential race on here and take them elsewhere if need be.


680 posted on 05/04/2012 12:36:22 PM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Her eldest sister will be 37 by the time she is born

That is one huge age range - and yeah, we got careless


681 posted on 05/04/2012 12:37:43 PM PDT by EnglishCon (When life gets too much to stand - kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
In addition, there must be a more intense focus at the grass roots level. This goes beyond simply working for a candidate or candidates. We focus sooooo much on the top (president)and others, while committee chairmanship goes begging.

If you desire to root out the RINOs from GOPee leadership, it can not be done with out control of committee chairs - establishing honest, conservative, constitutionalists elected to committee chairmanships in every district in the country should also be a top priority.

Their votes can help kick the GOPee out of leadership of the GOP party(only such elected officials get to vote on leadership).

682 posted on 05/04/2012 12:38:17 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; Responsibility2nd
Geez. What EnglishCon said is now a zottable offense in your mind?




Resp2nd's comment was NOT to EngCon...

About Zottable offenses, I have no idea where that stands now..
683 posted on 05/04/2012 12:38:57 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: caww
Truly he is not a stable minded man

What has he said that makes you believe he's unstable?

. . . now certainly beyond the will to be President as he has stated. He simply wants to go out with his voice heard...and said as much to that affect.

Here is the interview from ABC. If one ignores the lead in, and reads just what Dr. Paul said, one must admit that he seems rather hopeful, if not convinced.

"An amazing admission tonight from Ron Paul.

In an exclusive interview, I asked him: “When you lay your head on your pillow at night, do you see yourself in the Oval Office?”

“Not really,” he said.

He went on to say that he’s not blind to the odds, but they are “not as slim as they were 25 years ago.”

There are many ways to interpret this interview. Of course the LSM is bound to see it the way that best presents their agenda.

Further he'd have no chance against Obama at all....Romney's going to have his hands full as well.

According to polls I've seen, Paul does at least four or five points better than Romney against BO, and his appeal is to a much wider electorate.

More from the ABC interview: "I also asked if he though (sic) he was too old to be president. He’d be 81 at the end of his first term.

He said, “Freedom is a youthful idea,” his health is good, and he challenges any of his rivals to a physical fitness test.

He also jokingly accused me of ageism.

“Be careful,” he said. “There are laws against that.”

One other thing, wouldn't you trust Paul to nominate constitutionalists to the Supreme Court as opposed to Romney? I still don't understand why a Freeper would even contemplate a vote for Romney and not consider voting for Paul in the primary if he has a primary vote. I just don't get it. Why are we giving in to Romney before the final primary?

684 posted on 05/04/2012 12:39:33 PM PDT by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan: pray the Rosary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon
Her eldest sister will be 37 by the time she is born

Dang that's 148 Trimesters in the womb.....I bet the mother is going to get real tired. ;)

685 posted on 05/04/2012 12:40:20 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
It’s like a fish restaurant that only sells processed tuna sandwiches, that’s how far off the path they have come. If I go to a fish restaurant and want to order fish but it turns out they’re pissing on my head and callin’ it rain, I ain’t playing that game any more.

Whatever, you can order any damned thing you want but if it ain't on the menu, you get NOTHING.

So by writing-in your fantasy candidate, you get nothing.

You are not helping, you are not participating, you are just being a whiny brat bent on putting your own way above the more pragmatic choice.

That's fine, be that whiny brat. But realize that you help only Obama by doing so.

Yeah, you will have sent a message.. straight to the trash can.

Bully for you.

686 posted on 05/04/2012 12:40:57 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you, Jim. You are speaking wise words.

If we bite and devour each other, we’ll end up looking like Barack Obama’s dog sandwich.


687 posted on 05/04/2012 12:42:59 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; humblegunner

See post #181


688 posted on 05/04/2012 12:43:43 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

see post #181


689 posted on 05/04/2012 12:46:07 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

smart move


690 posted on 05/04/2012 12:46:53 PM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon
You just gave God a chance to give you a wonderful gift. That's not careless. :-)

Remember Abraham and Sarah. They were even older. lol

691 posted on 05/04/2012 12:47:13 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies]


692 posted on 05/04/2012 12:47:13 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

smart move


693 posted on 05/04/2012 12:47:31 PM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
Romney is not going to win anyway. The GOP always loses when they push a liberal.

And the media has been holding fire on Romney until he sews up the nomination. Soon as he does, be prepared for the excrement dump from the media.

/johnny

694 posted on 05/04/2012 12:47:36 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Well said.


695 posted on 05/04/2012 12:48:26 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Well - she got a bit tired with conception!

Couldn’t resist, though we are both shitting bricks here. I mean, we’ll both be nigh on 80 before she sods off and gets her own life/


696 posted on 05/04/2012 12:50:10 PM PDT by EnglishCon (When life gets too much to stand - kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

I saw that - thanks. I will research for my state.


697 posted on 05/04/2012 12:51:46 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

JimRob said to “vote straight conservative for every slot on our ballots.” Explain exactly how are you voting straight conservative when you pull the lever for someone as librul as Romney? You ain’t. You’re voting republican. Bully for you, stuck on stupid and staying part of the problem.


698 posted on 05/04/2012 12:51:46 PM PDT by Kevmo (Palin 2012. It's just me in the voting booth. 100% straight republican ticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

There will likely be an election in 2016.

What’s doubtful is whether there will be more than one name on the ballot.


699 posted on 05/04/2012 12:51:52 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Romeny might be a “serious American”....but it’s what he’s “serious” about that bothers me...


700 posted on 05/04/2012 12:53:44 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 601-650651-700701-750 ... 1,501-1,525 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson