Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The state both parties want (Virginia)
Politico ^ | May 3, 2012 | Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns

Posted on 05/04/2012 6:40:58 AM PDT by C19fan

The verdict is in: Barack Obama’s 2008 victory in Virginia was not a fluke. For the once reliably Republican state, competitive presidential elections are the new normal. Just look at the candidates’ schedules. President Obama will make Richmond the site of his kickoff campaign rally this Saturday and, as he often does, will motorcade across the Potomac on Friday for an official event in Northern Virginia, this one devoted to student loans at an Arlington high school. Mitt Romney has two stops in Virginia lined up this week, Wednesday in Northern Virginia and Thursday in Hampton Roads, and he will also be in Lynchburg to speak to graduates of Liberty University next week.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: obama; romney; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: buckalfa
One would think the 2012 would be a slam dunk for anybody running against the failures and abuses of the current administration.

...and then the GOP went and selected Mitt "Obama's a Nice Guy" Romney.

21 posted on 05/04/2012 7:59:14 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

As a Virginian of 40 years, Virginia is two states: one like Massachusetts up north - and the rest of the state.

Those on the Federal tit - and the rest of us.

Best thing Virginia could do is lop off the northern section and make the new state NoVA...but then that would give the libtards two more senators and a few congressmen......

It’s another world up there, and most of the rest of the state wants nothing to do with them....

Now, how to explain most of the rest of Virginia’s love for the Washington Redskins when they detest everything else up there? There’s no explanation for that....rational or emotional....


22 posted on 05/04/2012 7:59:38 AM PDT by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Silly article. Obama will win VA.


23 posted on 05/04/2012 8:09:15 AM PDT by newzjunkey (I advocate separation of school and sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Okay in 2009 just 9 months after Obama took office the VA voters elected McDonnell as governor and he has made a name for himself as a real conservative who gets things done.

Then in the 2010 VA voters replaced I think 4 Democrats in the House with Republicans and voted in enough Republicans to takeover the State Government.

Jim Webb was a total disaster as a Senator and has decided not to run this fall so George Allen will be running again....Tim Kaine....which should be interesting.

So tell me again that Virginia can't go Republican.

24 posted on 05/04/2012 8:23:21 AM PDT by when the time is right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

“I don’t believe Obama is so popular down there [VA]”

You have to factor in the explosion of the VA population thanks to the expansion of government and its contractors. Those folks seem to LOVE Obama.

In ‘08 there were more Obama bumper stickers at the Pentagon than there were McCain, similarly in ‘04, more JFnK than W. Get outside Northern VA (i.e., DC suburbs) and it’s a wholly different state. Alas, it is NOVA that dominates in the end.


25 posted on 05/04/2012 9:13:10 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

“The conventional wisdom is that the 0ne has 247 EV’s locked in. He only has to win 23 additional votes for re-election. Demographics and values in VA and elsewhere are changing. We just fail to accept the trend as we view the nation through our Freeper tinted glasses.”

I don’t quote polls or surveys (or have much faith in them); according to the situation “on the ground” Obama will have a very difficult time being re-elected. I’d love to know what is so much better over the last four years in those states making up his hypothetical 247 votes; is he really going to win more than Al Gore (who didn’t have fours years of failure around his neck)?

I’d like someone to explain to me how he’ll win Illinois; are that many people there content with the status quo? I based my opinion on what actually happened in 2009 and 2010 (when things were better than they are now); none of the media bastards called those outcomes, either.


26 posted on 05/04/2012 9:52:56 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
The Dems took heart in Romney's turnout in Virginia in the primary. He got 9% of what you would expect in a normal off-year election.

It was just him versus Ron Paul in a neck and neck competition and Ron nearly skunked him!

THings haven't changed.

BTW, a poll very similar to the Post poll on Romney/Obama reveals that Mourdock beats Lugar by 10 pts ~ see: >http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/richard-mourdock-up-ten-points-over-dick-lugar-in-new-poll/2012/05/04/gIQAsL4G1T_blog.html

27 posted on 05/04/2012 9:55:01 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Obama won NJ in 2008; by the time our governor’s race took place a year later most of the bumper stickers were gone and Dem Jon Corzine lost his job to a true tax-cutting TEA Partier (Chris Christie). We’ve lost thousands of teaching, police, and fire jobs since then, and Christie remains popular; Obama’s election was a fluke due to public misery and now that same factor will sink him.

FReepers think a lot of well-intentioned people were hoodwinked in 2008; I assure you they knew exactly what they were doing: They were voting against another term of Bush, and would have voted for anyone to make it so. They got what they voted for, and I’m sure they’re looking to do the same again (vote out the incumbent, regardless of affiliation).


28 posted on 05/04/2012 9:58:39 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: when the time is right
McDonnell turned out to be a faux Conservative.

He's prime Mittbot material and actually stood aside while Romney's campaign chairman, the Lt. Governor, connived with party officials to keep EVERYBODY ELSE out of the primary.

There you have it ~ Republican voters in Virginia are easily deceived but we did boycott that primary. Only Freepers saw through that nonsense.

Do you seriously imagine Romney can beat Obama with the same tactics?

29 posted on 05/04/2012 9:59:37 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
It wasn't just college kids voting unlawfully. McCain lost in an Obama landslide ~ by 6% points.

The Republicans were simply crushed.

30 posted on 05/04/2012 10:02:31 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The Dems are terrified because “voter turnout” in any election doesn’t bode well for incumbents; they know that they gained nothing by Romney’s slog through the primaries. In the end, their empty suit has to convince people that he has more to offer than his opponent (ANY opponent), and as long as that person didn’t oversee what Obama did for the last four years they should win handily. Americans haven gotten much smarter in the last four years, but they know their standard of living has fallen significantly and they have gotten more angry.

The logic that got Obama elected will cost him his job; he has nothing to say, and has been exposed as an un-American affirmative action Bolshevik. Broken down into simplest form, what could ANY American hope to gain by voting for Obama? Besides the thumb in the eye that urban blacks may want to give the whites that feed, clothe, and house them, what over the last four years would convince anyone else to do it?


31 posted on 05/04/2012 10:05:54 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

In ‘08 I saw a neighborhood kid, fully mentally challenged, brought to the polls by an O van, with the aide ‘helping’ her to vote. I also chatted at the polls with a woman whose daughter and her AF officer husband were HUGH BHO fans, at least then. There was fraud on every level and all manner of reasons BHO carried VA, not the least of which was aggressive voter registration.


32 posted on 05/04/2012 10:26:06 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
I stood in line behind a bunch of droolers ~ people I've known for 1/3 of a century. They voted against Bush because they'd been led to believe he was evil.

So utterly stupid of them.

BTW, they were mostly white.

33 posted on 05/04/2012 10:29:48 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson