Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
A reply of yours...@Vattel isn't U.S. law. 02/17/2011
327 posted on 05/08/2012 1:29:14 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
No Vattel isn't U.S. law. And U.S. law doesn't follow Vattel. But that isn't what I asked and you know it.

If Vattel WAS U.S. law - and all U.S. law was in accordance with Vattel - then McCain would certainly be natural born.

My question is what did Vattel write that would render McCain not a natural born citizen?

According to Vattel and the section I quoted McCain would be born with natural allegiance to America and be a citizen at birth, an indigenous or native citizen - and thus a natural born citizen.

Now under what section of Vattel would McCain not be a native or indigenous or natural born citizen?

Lame excuses are wearing thin.

What section of Vattel, assuming Vattel has any bearing on who is or is not a natural born citizen in America , would make McCain anything other than a natural born citizen?

328 posted on 05/08/2012 1:56:53 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson