Or maybe they just have so much money they don't want to bother with actually being pregnant.
Hey jerk, read the article. They already have 3 other children that were not born via a surrogate.
I am guessing too much polygamist Mormon inbreeding is keeping them from having a child naturally.
Or maybe they just have so much money they don’t want to bother with actually being pregnant.
You are an arrogant ass.
I bet you call yourself a Christian, too.
Two babies are born and you come up with that kind of hate.
The simple explanation, and the usual reason in most of these cases, is that the wife is infertile or has had multiple failures to carry to term. She is 39 after all, and if she hasn’t already had children her time is up.
Everyone I know who has been in this position has already tried all sorts of fertility treatments. This is the last option.
Just come right out and say you don’t like the Romneys.
I know I don’t. Here they basically rented a womb ....
And what kind of stupid name is `Tag’ anyway?
Missionary position? Hey, too much information girlfriend!
This isn’t The View: Spare us the details of your sex life, OK?
Let’s get back to Mitt. I can see the grandkids going to `Tag’ and asking, “Um, Tag, Dad—is granddad alive? He hasn’t moved all day ..... “
Guess I told the gun=grabbing, abortionist, homo Rhomnoids,
Don’t let the lefty bass-turds grind you down: Screw `em!
Or maybe a 39 year old woman doesn’t have the eggs to become pregnant? I’m not a Mitt fan, but this is an ignorant statement.
” Their other three children were not born via surrogacy.”
Can’t you read?
“I am guessing too much polygamist Mormon inbreeding is keeping them from having a child naturally.”
Not to defend surrogacy, because I don’t approve of it, but this piece does state that they had 3 children NOT via surrogate.
Which is how it says it, which sound a little odd, but presumably it means they had them the old fashioned way.