Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Romney Losing the Enthusiasm Race? (Tea Party Not Excited about Mitt)
ConservativeHQ ^ | 7 May 12 | CHQ Staff

Posted on 05/08/2012 9:25:34 AM PDT by xzins

The first USA TODAY/Gallup Swing States Poll since the GOP settled on moderate former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney as its presumptive Presidential nominee shows an interesting dynamic for Romney and the GOP.

After the Republican Party nominated one of the most moderate candidates in the field, enthusiasm for Romney is down among self-identified GOP moderates and Romney’s likely victory or defeat now hinges on “swing states” where Tea Party backed candidates made strong showings in the 2010 Tea Party wave election.

Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin are the swing states Romney needs to win to be elected. Key states, such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida that contributed to Obama’s 365 to 173 electoral vote blow-out of the McCain-Palin ticket in 2008 are in play at this time – barely.

Evidence of Romney's problem in Tea Party influenced states is that while Tea Party and conservative-backed office holders are solidifying their popularity, he does not seem to be benefiting from their popularity.

In the state of Michigan, one of Romney’s “home” states where he narrowly won the Republican primary. Romney’s post-primary approval fell and he trails Obama by 6 points or more – Democratic polling firm PPP has Obama leading Romney by 16 in Michigan.

In contrast, Obama’s job approval rating has gone up from 42 percent in September to 50 percent today, and his disapproval rating has dropped from 50 percent to 45 percent.

Michigan's Tea Party backed Governor Rick Snyder's approval rating of 38 percent in September has now hit 50 percent in the state. The Governor's disapproval rating is now down to 36 percent, compared to 46 percent in September.

Tea Party backed Florida Governor Rick Scott, whose “shakeup Tallahassee” agenda cost him some popularity as he made tough calls on the budget, has gone up 10 points recently and is now at 43 percent, statistically the same as Obama’s 43 percent. Romney’s multi-million dollar carpet bombing of Newt Gingrich in Florida gained him exactly 1 point over Obama to place him at 43 percent.

In Pennsylvania, after Rick Santorum dropped out, Romney didn’t run his usual barrage of negative ads. According to the Quinnipiac poll, Romney actually lost five points while running virtually unopposed in the Pennsylvania primary, and now trails Obama 47 percent to 39 percent.

Since March, Obama has gained two points while Romney lost three. Despite campaigning in the state, Romney still has a negative approval rating, with only 35 percent approving and 39 percent disapproving. Obama’s approval rating in Pennsylvania is 51 percent approve to 43 disapprove.

The states of Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida, were three of the top states where the Tea Party wave swept new constitutional conservative members into Congress. In Florida, four of the seven new Republicans were elected with significant Tea Party support, in Ohio the Tea Party backed candidates contributed five freshmen to the House Republican ranks, and in Pennsylvania four out of the five new Republicans in the delegation were elected with strong Tea Party support.

As Gallup noted, this enthusiasm gap is hurting Romney, “Obama's swing-state prospects also look a bit brighter than Romney's on the basis of voter enthusiasm. More than half of Obama's supporters, 55 percent, are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting in this year's presidential election, up from 49 percent saying this in March. By contrast, 46 percent of Romney's supporters are extremely or very enthusiastic, unchanged from 47 percent in March. Today's figures reflect a reversal from January, when 55 percent of Romney voters were extremely or very enthusiastic, compared with 50 percent of Obama voters.”

In most of the so-called “swing” states, the recent progress made by the GOP has been powered by Tea Party enthusiasm and Tea Party backed candidates. Unfortunately for Romney, while liberal and moderate support for him has predictably waned, the Tea Party enthusiasm that has been winning elections for the GOP in those key “swing states” has yet to rub-off on him.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conservatives; elections; romney; romneytruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-94 last
To: CodeToad

I reckon the ABO enthusiasm will increase exponentially as we get closer to election day 2012.


51 posted on 05/08/2012 10:12:10 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Mitt Romney - He’s whatever you want him to be.


52 posted on 05/08/2012 10:12:17 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

“Well with Obama, we will be rid of him in 4 years. If Romney is elected, we will be stuck with Obama-lite for 8 years.”

Excellent way to put it. Voting for Romeny simply kicks the can down the road.


53 posted on 05/08/2012 10:13:47 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“I reckon the ABO enthusiasm will increase exponentially as we get closer to election day 2012.”

Probably, but always be careful of what you wish for. Romney is every bit a Communist Obama is.


54 posted on 05/08/2012 10:16:04 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It is hard to get enthusiastic about voting for the lesser of two evils, particularly when you are undecided whether Obama or Romney is the lesser of two evils.


55 posted on 05/08/2012 10:17:03 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

LOL!

Right on the money, Bubba.

And if Romney were to be president, his track record in Massachusetts says he’ll side with Democrats on offensive legislation.

So: Romney + Rinos + Democrats = Liberal agenda.

And no one could stop them.


56 posted on 05/08/2012 10:25:23 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Owl558

Thanks. Excellent point you make about the volunteers.


57 posted on 05/08/2012 10:27:24 AM PDT by Mich Patriot (Today if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse. RReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
You people are going to cheer yourselves into another 4 years of Obama

You people are lulling yourself into believing mitt could actually beat obama - he hasn't won one debate - only those the media said he did. In reality it is NONE!

58 posted on 05/08/2012 10:30:21 AM PDT by presently no screen name (God First!! VAB: Voting Against Both---> Romney and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Why would that be?

Probably because we conservatives are shallow, low brow neanderthals.

Honestly, Uncle, in my case it's only cause he has a John Edwards hairdo. /sarc

59 posted on 05/08/2012 10:33:11 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I am enthusiastic about voting for Ubama's opponent.

You'll have to kill me to keep me from voting against him.

60 posted on 05/08/2012 10:35:26 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
AB(w)hOR(es)
61 posted on 05/08/2012 10:38:05 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’ll vote for Romney in the fall, but I just registered my vote for Newt in the NC primary. Felt good.


62 posted on 05/08/2012 10:39:04 AM PDT by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
"Yes, I intend to. Our victory lies in taking the Senate and holding the House. I expect the GOP presidential candidate will win but I don’t expect him to lead. I vow to fight him every step of the way. Romney is an FDR Democrat at best."

BINGO! Lock the thread, we have a winner. Personally I'm planning to ACTUALLY PUT A CLOTHESPIN ON MY NOSE in the voting booth. Yes really.

63 posted on 05/08/2012 10:39:50 AM PDT by Mich Patriot (Today if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse. RReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

Great decision.

Lack of support for Romney could blow up at the convention.

If all of our “abo’s” who claim they wouldn’t touch romney with a 10 foot pole would think just a bit, they’d realize not tipping their hand is a good thing.

Since they didn’t like him, there was no point in falling in line til the last second. Then they could have gotten considerable concessions from him.

I’ll never vote for him, but I would vote for a different republican conservative.


64 posted on 05/08/2012 10:44:21 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Meh, I’m excited about being rid of 0bama and that nest of vipers he surrounds himself with.


65 posted on 05/08/2012 10:57:01 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The GOP is gonna get an ass-whupin’ in November at the top of the ticket and they have nobody to blame but their own little clique.

I have no sympathy for them.


66 posted on 05/08/2012 11:10:23 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

There is NO guarantee of mitt ousting barry, in fact, what actually what do you think his chances are? Not your wishful thinking but reality?

With Newt there was a 99.9% chance of barry being ousted ALONG with the undoing of obama’s damage from day one and on the Constitution track ALL the way.


67 posted on 05/08/2012 11:21:14 AM PDT by presently no screen name (God First!! VAB: Voting Against Both---> Romney and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This article explained back in December how Romney’s popularity always goes down as people get to know him better. We posted this here and attempted to explain to people how this was likely to happen again. FR seems to be batting 1,000 when it comes to figuring out who and what Romney was and is far in advance of everybody else. We’re not a “fringe” right-wing site, we’re the vastly well-informed canary in the coal mine for the conservative movement.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/overestimating-romney_611846.html


68 posted on 05/08/2012 11:22:40 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
Fixed...

What has he done lately ever for the conservative cause?

Romney's List, Romney's List

69 posted on 05/08/2012 11:35:55 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

YOU people are going to cheer yourselves into 8 years of Romney, and then we’ll have to spend 8 years whining, complaining, and stocking up on ammo.


70 posted on 05/08/2012 11:37:35 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I supported Newt. Unfortunately so far the voters did not agree with my choice..
Last time I looked Newt suspended his campagn and has said he will support Romney ..I will vote for Newt in the primary..and for the last man standing that can possibly oust Zero in November.
I want Obama out and will support the nominee...

I don’t believe anyone has a lock in this Presidential election..no guarantees that I see.


71 posted on 05/08/2012 11:37:55 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Then he’s a severe CINO...


72 posted on 05/08/2012 11:43:15 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Nonsense.


73 posted on 05/08/2012 11:43:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Actually he’s a “Democrat In All BUT Name”.


74 posted on 05/08/2012 11:48:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: xzins

How could anyone be excited about Mittens? I’m excited about removing Obama from the White House, but my enthusiasm ends there.


75 posted on 05/08/2012 11:54:05 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I am not thrilled with Romeny (unless he pick a Palin-like VP)

The VP would only be window-dressing and totally ignored after he or she served the purpose of getting Mitt elected. Mitt wouldn't get my vote if he named me as his VP choice.

76 posted on 05/08/2012 12:00:22 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Obama vs. Romney - clear evidence that our nation has been judged by God and found wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Depends how the economy is doing. Romney and the GOP seem to want to redefine the party as the party that “knows how to fix the economy.” So there’s no point in electing the GOP if the economy happens to be doing good under a Democrat. It’s going to be a big waste of money on a campaign since if the economy’s doing bad, voters will switch votes to the other party anyway. Which is why they should be spending the campaign talking about all the actual planks of conservatism, and not this whole “fixing the economy” message which sounds a lot like “our socialism is better than their socialism.” Or do they want a party that can only win when the economy happens to be doing bad and never any other time?


77 posted on 05/08/2012 12:17:16 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Face it, he’s not an excitiing guy. Even if he was a hard core conservative he wouldn’t be exciting.

Our source of excitement will have to be getting rid of Obama.


78 posted on 05/08/2012 12:23:47 PM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I coined a term for them: DIABLO — Democrat In All But Label Only.


79 posted on 05/08/2012 12:27:27 PM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: xzins

When it comes down to it, I will probably hold my nose (and my gag reflex) and vote for Romney over Obama. I can at least hope that Romney isn’t a hard core socialist intent upon the destruction of America. I know that Obama is.

The 2012 election is going to be a repeat of the 1996 election. After Clinton revulsion caused the nationwide Republican landslide in 1994, no one thought that Clinton could get elected dog catcher two years later. Then the Republicans nominated Bob Dole.

Bob Dole was a war hero. I respected Bob Dole and had no problem voting for him over Clinton, but he was a weak presidential candidate that got nominated mostly because it was his turn.

Obama is going to get re-elected. Hopefully the Republicans will take back the Senate. Maybe there will be enough conservative Republicans in the Senate who will man up and filibuster Obama’s far left wing judicial nominees. I’m not holding my breath.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.


80 posted on 05/08/2012 12:34:06 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; All

well, we’d better get excited dang quick.

We need to go into this election with great enthusiasm... every day Obama proves more and more that he is a serious danger to this country.

What is the point in continuing to bemoan Romney?

Let’s look at him in a positive way.

He has a name, also.

He’s not ABO any more. He’s my candidate name of Mitt Romney.


81 posted on 05/08/2012 12:41:04 PM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Newt is still going to Aug/Fl, but not campaigning, so his support of Romney was from other ‘mitt reports’ and Newt’s support was vague but throughout his debates/campaign was for defeating obama, while mitt’s was on trashing Newt and taking him out.

Nothing is set in stone till Aug and my support for Newt will stay the same until August but always against Mitt. Everyone/because of media bias, has declared mitt a winner since the beginning and now many just continues eating their propaganda - even though they ‘supposedly’ know better. It’s the media that wants to/has given us our candidate or rather they think they have.


82 posted on 05/08/2012 12:41:36 PM PDT by presently no screen name (God First!! VAB: Voting Against Both---> Romney and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

The only way he could lose my vote is if he DID name you as vice president. :)


83 posted on 05/08/2012 12:46:12 PM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Normally, politicians address their message to the voters based on the voters' concerns. All the major polls show that people are most concerned about the economy and jobs. Those are the number 1 issues. Romney is correct to focus on those issues.

There are also concerns about the huge national debt and annual deficits of over $1 trillion a year since Obama took office. He has amassed more debt in four years than Bush did in 8 years. Our entitlement programs are unsustainable. They will bankrupt us. Property values have declined precipitously with millions of housing foreclosures. The unemployment rate for the young is the highest in over 60 years. Our credit rating has declined. Government regulation has stifiled business and the use of our own natural energy resources.

I could go on and on about the issues. Romney must have a clear message and one focussed on just a few things. In addition to jobs and the economy, I would go after the debt and deficits and the hugely unpopular Obamacare. You can infuse discussion of these issues with the conservative philosophy of limited government, individual liberty, fiscal responsibity, and national security.

84 posted on 05/08/2012 1:09:24 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: altura; cripplecreek; P-Marlowe; SoConPubbie; wagglebee; wmfights

We’re not excited. We won’t get excited.

So, the issue becomes putting conservatives in the house and senate.

That’s another reason I can easily vote for Goode and not worry about the Obama presidency.

With conservatives in the house and senate, the agenda of Obama will be dead on arrival. Romney, on the other hand, will gain a bit of party loyalty, and he’ll get his stupid liberal agenda passed. When the conservatives won’t work with him, he’ll overturn to the rinos & democrats, and he’ll get his agenda passed that way, too.

So, in reality, a radical, liberal, social corporatist like Romney is actually a bigger threat.

Conservatives in Congress is the key.


85 posted on 05/08/2012 1:49:09 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Romney doesn’t care much about the Tea Party either.


86 posted on 05/08/2012 2:16:32 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyDawg
I would vote for a dog turd enthusiastically if it meant an end to Obama’s Presidency.

If you vote for Romney, that's about what you will be doing.

87 posted on 05/08/2012 2:27:58 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Romney: ‘I’ll take a lot of credit’ for auto industry success [bailout]

Another reason to not vote for this socialist.

The bailouts were completely unnecessary. All that would have been needed was for the government to guarantee post filing financing.

If anyone recalls, the bailouts were sold as a way to avoid Chapter 11 bankruptcy, but they filed anyway.

The governments cash was nothing more than Obama's way of buying a seat at the table to protect his union buds, screw over the bondholders and control the companies for the balance of his presidency.

88 posted on 05/08/2012 2:40:24 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: altura
The only way he could lose my vote is if he DID name you as vice president. :)

If you are really a conservative and not one of the Mittens who come here to sing the praises of Romney, I can assure you that you'd like my political views far, far better than Romney's. I'd actually attract conservatives to vote for me and not just because I'm not Obama (which appears to be Mitt's only redeeming qualification). Like Sarah Palin whose political views probably most closely mirror mine, I can say conservative things like I believe them because I really do.

I'm absolutely confident that Romney won't name me as VP, so you won't have any internal conflicts to overcome. ;-)

89 posted on 05/08/2012 3:45:26 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Obama vs. Romney - clear evidence that our nation has been judged by God and found wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: altura

90 posted on 05/08/2012 4:00:51 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DirtyDawg
Exactly right! I would vote for a dog turd enthusiastically if it meant an end to Obama’s Presidency.

Me, too, but I won't vote for Romney. [That joke was blatantly stolen from another FReeper who I would attribute if I could remember who it was.]

91 posted on 05/08/2012 5:50:47 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Obama vs. Romney - clear evidence that our nation has been judged by God and found wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The race is between a Democrat (Romney) and a Communist (Obama).


92 posted on 05/08/2012 5:53:50 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Thanks for the ‘update.’


93 posted on 05/08/2012 7:16:59 PM PDT by Milagros (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mo

no, the race is between a 3rd way, social corporatist and a communist.


94 posted on 05/08/2012 7:45:48 PM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson