Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Santorum endorses Romney for president
Reuters ^ | 5/8/12 | Tom Gannam

Posted on 05/08/2012 12:03:40 PM PDT by Evil Slayer

(Reuters) - Former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum endorsed his one-time fierce rival Mitt Romney on Monday, a move that may help the party's presumptive White House nominee win over religious conservatives.

Santorum said in an unusual late-night statement that the two have differences, but that he came away from a meeting with the ex-Massachusetts governor impressed with Romney's "deep understanding" of economic and family issues central to the campaign.

"Above all else, we both agree that President (Barack) Obama must be defeated. The task will not be easy. It will require all hands on deck if our nominee is to be victorious," Santorum said.

"Governor Romney will be that nominee and he has my endorsement and support to win this the most critical election of our lifetime," he said in the statement, which was emailed to supporters.

The socially conservative former Pennsylvania senator, who won 11 state contests and was the favorite of Republican voters in a Reuters/Ipsos poll for the No. 2 spot on the ticket, is best known for his strong opposition to abortion and gay rights.

He clashed sharply with Romney in several televised debates, but his support may now help Romney win over religious conservatives before the November 6 election.

Santorum had been reluctant to give an endorsement, but he said that changed after a "clear-the-air" meeting with Romney in Pittsburgh on Friday. The question of endorsement did not come up, but Santorum said the conversation was candid and focused on issues.

"During our meeting I felt a deep responsibility to assess Governor Romney's commitment to addressing the issues most important to conservatives, as well his commitment to ensuring our appropriate representation in a Romney administration," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ricksantorum; romney; santorum

1 posted on 05/08/2012 12:03:45 PM PDT by Evil Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
Too bad Santorum is not too smart.


MITT ROMNEY - THE PROVEN BAD GOVERNOR

"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal."

[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]

Willard “Etch-a-Sketch” Milt, the magic, ineligible, backstabbing RINO:
"I bet you $10,000 that whatever my position
on immigration will be, whichever day it is, as it mutates,
it will ALWAYS be reported on FOX-Bain "News"
by either of my anchor-wives-in-training as both ‘severely conservative’
and ‘exponentially clear’.
"



2 posted on 05/08/2012 12:08:51 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

He doesn’t sound too enthusiastic about it...


3 posted on 05/08/2012 12:11:59 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
I never could figure out why conservatives would jump on the Romney bandwagon; at this point why would an ‘endorsement’ be necessary.

The answer, I think, is that if/when Romney loses the GOPe can't point the finger at (in this case) Santorum and say “See, if you endorsed Romney your supporters would have voted for him and he would have won!”

Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the others are just chomping at the bit waiting to blame conservatives for a Romney loss, should it occur. Never mind that the GOPe gave us, once again, an unwinnable candidate.

4 posted on 05/08/2012 12:12:07 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Forget the GOP and build the Constitution Party, because the status quo is no longer the way to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

I wish some good things could happen for our side.

Sigh.


5 posted on 05/08/2012 12:12:20 PM PDT by diamond6 (Check out: http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/home.php and learn about the faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Evil Slayer

swish - The sound of my respect for the man out the window.


7 posted on 05/08/2012 12:21:00 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And the fat lady sings when Sarah endorses mitt.


8 posted on 05/08/2012 12:23:19 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

He sounds less enthusiastic than Newt did.


9 posted on 05/08/2012 12:23:47 PM PDT by Ingtar ("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

“Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, and the others are just chomping at the bit waiting to blame conservatives for a Romney loss...”

Coulter maybe, but Hannity and Limbaugh I don’t think are going to “blame” conservatives for a Romney loss. Rush will, however, blame moderate/elitist GOP’ers for Romney’s selection as the candidate and his loss, if that occurs.

You should listen to Rush more often because it’s obvious from your comment that you don’t.


10 posted on 05/08/2012 12:37:34 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo

Romney will win in a landslide.


11 posted on 05/08/2012 12:42:15 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Romney wins! Except on November 2012. HE’S POSER AND A LOSER.


12 posted on 05/08/2012 12:50:42 PM PDT by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Mitt waiting for the phone call from Sarah. waiting....waiting....waiting....


13 posted on 05/08/2012 1:04:36 PM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Don’t like it but have to. No choice.


14 posted on 05/08/2012 1:33:03 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
“You should listen to Rush more often because it’s obvious from your comment that you don’t.”

It's true that I give Rush far less time now than in years past. The list of reasons for that are long, but suffice it to say that Rush advances the interests of the GOP more than he does conservatism and as a result, hinders our efforts to return this country to her rightful place in the world. How's that? Because the Republican Party has turned into a 'go-along, get-along' organization. That's never going to get us where we need to be.

Whether or not Rush ends up blaming conservatives for a Romney loss remains to be seen. I do not dislike Rush and I hope you are correct.

I do know the GOPe has incredible disdain for the conservative, especially the ‘social conservative’. They are just not welcome in this party anymore. We are not taken seriously.

15 posted on 05/08/2012 2:20:57 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Forget the GOP and build the Constitution Party, because the status quo is no longer the way to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

The GOPe do have disdain for Conservatives, and Rush continually points that out. Rush believes Conservatives need to control the GOP. I agree because I am one of those who say there’s not a “dime’s worth of difference between the parties”; but, when I say that, I mean the ‘rats and the GOPe/moderates, i.e., those other than true Conservatives. The GOPe/moderates can hang as far as I’m concerned.


16 posted on 05/08/2012 2:55:18 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Defeating Obama is the key, I don’t care who does it at this point. I do wish we had a real Conservative as the nominee though.


17 posted on 05/08/2012 3:19:20 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
Never mind that the GOPe gave us, once again, an unwinnable candidate.

That's a pretty absurd assertion, considering Romney leads in both Gallup and Rassmussen polls, is raising more money than Obama, and Zero owns the mess were in; high unemployment, high gas prices, and a million new forclosures expected this year. A Romney landslide is far more likely than the other way around.

18 posted on 05/08/2012 4:43:35 PM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

When this was announced by way of FOX AM (radio)the reading by the newscaster went like this :
“It the middle of the night Santorum announced his tepid endorsement”
And right away I felt much better about something we all knew was comming.


19 posted on 05/08/2012 5:11:13 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (The best way to punish a - country is let professors run it. Fredrick the Great p/p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“He doesn’t sound too enthusiastic about it...”

You are are correct.

“Santorum’s underwhelming endorsement of Romney”

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/santorum-underwhelming-endorsement-romney-081055500.html


20 posted on 05/08/2012 8:39:57 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Rick Santorum will be on Jay Leno’s show tonight, coming up. Rick received much applause from the audience. He is liked.


21 posted on 05/08/2012 8:50:32 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Should have said: “Rick received much applause from the audience WHEN HE WAS ANNOUNCED.”

Rick hasn’t been on yet, but coming up soon.


22 posted on 05/08/2012 8:59:32 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
“That's a pretty absurd assertion, considering Romney leads in both Gallup and Rassmussen polls, is raising more money than Obama, and Zero owns the mess were in; high unemployment, high gas prices, and a million new forclosures expected this year. A Romney landslide is far more likely than the other way around.”

You make some good points, but to those I counter with it's a long way to November, and polls can change dramatically, especially since the msm works hard to influence public opinion, and they're not going to even be fair to Romney much less help him.

Money's no problem for obama; any and all enemies of America in the world will willingly pony up the necessary funds. - who will say anything? Boehner? Holder? McCain?

Anyone who cares to know knows the economy's in the sewer. Economic reports, stock and commodity prices are all manipulated to the liking of the WH. And the financial press goes right along, making sure people don't look at that man behind the curtain. I believe that the economic and financial numbers will look quite rosey in the months leading up to Nov, regardless what the real economy is doing.

Finally, obams’s ace in the hole - voter fraud. The democratic machine has a long history of that and precious few have mounted a serious challenge to prosecute or stop it. No reason to believe this time will be different.

Bottom line: we play by the rules and are accountable, the left will lie, cheat, and steal to get what they want and are not accountable. It's very hard to win under those conditions.

23 posted on 05/08/2012 9:50:18 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Forget the GOP and build the Constitution Party, because the status quo is no longer the way to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

You make some good points too. But I didn’t say Romney was a lock, just that it’s silly to say he can’t win.


24 posted on 05/09/2012 2:01:33 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson