Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lugar makes last ditch appeal to save Senate career
Yahoo ^ | 5/8/12 | Nick Carey and Eric Johnson | Reuters

Posted on 05/08/2012 3:56:23 PM PDT by mdittmar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
He can't do that. Indiana has a sore loser law.

Uh oh! You hear that, Lisa? Your plan won't work!

"Dick can't do a write in??? What the @#$% is the matter with that state! It's HIS seat, for crying out loud!!!"


41 posted on 05/08/2012 4:24:37 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Maybe it’s the food...

They come to Washington with fire in their belly, and leave with lead in their butt.


42 posted on 05/08/2012 4:25:19 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: x
It would really help if you had some evidence -- something "sociopathic" that he'd done in 36 years in Washington.

Well, he has breathed the toxic fumes emanating from Washington DC all these years, and gone to those dinner parties...

43 posted on 05/08/2012 4:27:51 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Mourdock sounds like the bad wizard in the next Lord of the Rings ripoff


44 posted on 05/08/2012 4:30:19 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
A going away present for Loogy. .from the Tea Party


45 posted on 05/08/2012 4:30:51 PM PDT by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I can’t think of a better term than “last ditch” for this useless POS and what I’d like to see happen for him. Just as long as it’s “last”.


46 posted on 05/08/2012 4:32:44 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walk into a bar. Bartender says "what'll it be, Mitt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

[ Surely you can’t be serious. ]

I am serious and Don’t call me Shirley!

Oh and just found out Lugar has been primaried out!


47 posted on 05/08/2012 4:35:25 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; conservativegramma

This what a resident of Indiana, conservativegramma, posted back last May:

I live in Indiana. Indiana has a sore loser law.
Under Indiana Code 3-8-1-5.5 states:

IC 3-8-1-5.5
Candidates defeated in primary or nomination process; ineligibility
Sec. 5.5. (a) Except as provided in IC 3-13-1-19 and IC 3-13-2-10 for filling a vacancy on a ticket, a person who:
(1) is defeated in a primary election;
(2) appears as a candidate for nomination at a convention and is defeated;
(3) files a declaration of candidacy for nomination by a county, city, or town convention and is defeated; or
(4) files a declaration of candidacy for nomination by a caucus conducted under IC 3-13-1 or IC 3-13-2 and is defeated;
is not eligible to become a candidate for the same office in the next general or municipal election.

The exception in IC 3-13-1-19 states: “Sec. 19. A person who was defeated in a primary election or in a town or state convention is eligible to be appointed by the political party that the person affiliated with by voting in the most recent primary election held by that party. The person selected may fill any vacancy on the party’s ticket as a candidate in any general, municipal, or special election following that primary election or convention in which the vacancy occurred. However, a person is not disqualified from appointment under this section for not having voted in the most recent primary election if the appointee is certified as a member of that party by the county chairman for the county in which the appointee resides.” As added by P.L.5-1986, SEC.9. Amended by P.L.3-1987, SEC.423; P.L.3-1993, SEC.226.

The exception in IC-3-13-2-10 states: “Sec. 10. A person who was defeated in a primary election or in a town or state convention is eligible to be appointed by the person’s own political party to fill any vacancy on the party’s ticket as a candidate in any general, municipal, or special election following that primary election or convention.” As added by P.L.5-1986, SEC.9. Amended by P.L.3-1987, SEC.427.

In other words the only way Lugar can run as an independent candidate or 3rd party candidate is if he DOESN’T run in the Republican primary. He would have to run initially for that other 3rd or independent party FIRST and then win that party’s primary. Once defeated he cannot run again for the same office until the next election cycle.

And the only way Lugar can run after being defeated in the GOP primary is through a vacancy. Example: In 2012 his opposing primary candidate for the Republican Party is Richard Mourdock. Should Mourdock win and then subsequently die, withdraw, or be disqualified due to a criminal conviction, etc.; THEN and only THEN could the IN GOP appoint Lugar as the candidate to fill that vacancy.

So in other words as long as Lugar runs in the Republican party, and as long as he is defeated by Mourdock, and then so long as Mourdock stays healthy and remains qualified, then Lugar can’t run as an independent (or any other party) nor can he fill any vacancies on the GOP ticket.

22 posted on May 15, 2011 7:41:10 PM EDT by conservativegramma


48 posted on 05/08/2012 4:38:17 PM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: x
It would really help if you had some evidence -- something "sociopathic" that he'd done in 36 years in Washington.

Openly calling on Democrats to cross over and vote for him is sociopathic. A normal person would fight the good fight and take the result.

49 posted on 05/08/2012 4:40:27 PM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; BRL
He shouldn't have done that.

He got desperate and that's how many people act when they get desperate. If he had any chance of winning before, he lost it with this.

But some people had contempt for him long before this, and that wasn't really merited. 36 years in the Senate and he was far from the worst one in there.

50 posted on 05/08/2012 4:42:36 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: x
...36 years in the Senate and he was far from the worst one in there.

It was also not the point being debated.

51 posted on 05/08/2012 4:50:25 PM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I smell a sphincter.


52 posted on 05/08/2012 5:03:16 PM PDT by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rsobin

Do you suppose he’ll retire to his family farm in Indiana?


53 posted on 05/08/2012 5:11:36 PM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: x
36 years in the Senate and he was far from the worst one in there.

I am sure that on any given issue he probably voted the way I wanted him to more than 50% of the time, However, I never recall having seen him discuss anything on a talk show that would put him in the bad graces of the leftist media. He, like so many of these RINOs, play to the Washington insider crowd. That is what makes this so sweat to see him go. Maybe a few other Senators will realize that the TEA party is gonna chop them off at the knees before the lefty media is. They can now spend some time and ponder whether they want to pander to the "adult" crowd in Washington and get nice write ups in Time magazine or whether they want their seat.

54 posted on 05/08/2012 5:14:05 PM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD

Lugar’s new theme song should be, “Indiana don’t want me/Lord I can’t go back there....”


55 posted on 05/08/2012 5:14:57 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BRL

Sweet , sweat, sweep, swill, whatever.


56 posted on 05/08/2012 5:15:18 PM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

i proudly voted for mourdock . lugar sat back and did NOTHING to defend our country from BHO


57 posted on 05/08/2012 5:17:35 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch ( go in peace , serve the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

he’s not ....... i hope


58 posted on 05/08/2012 5:19:44 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch ( go in peace , serve the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Looks like backing Cruz in TX is the next best Conservative bet, after giving Walker a win in WI.


59 posted on 05/08/2012 5:20:42 PM PDT by G Larry (Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

I suspect he will. However, he’s already doing his best to damage us now by supporting the frightful LOST treaty, so he might not be able to do that much more damage than he’s already decided to do. That, IMHO, will be more than offset by the warning his massive defeat sends to all the other RINOS—they DAMN BETTER WELL listen to and respect the Tea Party if they want to keep their jobs.


60 posted on 05/08/2012 5:23:22 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson