Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Upstart Mourdock Defeats Longtime Indiana Sen. Lugar
LATimes ^ | May 08, 2012

Posted on 05/08/2012 5:29:23 PM PDT by Steelfish

Tea Party Upstart Mourdock Defeats Longtime Indiana Sen. Lugar

By Kim Geiger May 8, 2012 Richard Mourdock has defeated longtime Sen. Richard G. Lugar of Indiana in the Republican primary, according to an Associated Press projection, ending the career of one of the Senate’s most pragmatic politicians and casting a cloud over GOP efforts to win control of the chamber.

Mourdock, state treasurer in Indiana, campaigned as a conservative alternative to Lugar. He became a darling of the tea party movement after he began a legal challenge to the terms of the Obama administration’s bailout of Chrysler.

Mourdock was endorsed by Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann, and Lugar had the backing of the party establishment, including Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

Mourdock will face Democratic Rep. Joe Donnelly, a three-term congressman from the South Bend area, this fall. The matchup is the preferred outcome for Democrats, who view Lugar’s ouster as an opportunity to pick up a longtime Republican seat.

"Richard Mourdock is this year's Ken Buck," said Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Executive Director Guy Cecil. Buck was a tea-party-backed Republican who upset the establishment favorite in the GOP primary in Colorado in 2010, only to lose in November. "Tonight's results make the Indiana Senate race a toss-up."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: donttreadonme; elections; iloveit; indiana; lugar; mourdock; richardmourdock; rino; rinofreeamerica; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 next last
To: TMA62; hoosiermama
Mourdock will face Democratic Rep. Joe Donnelly, a three-term congressman from the South Bend area, this fall. The matchup is the preferred outcome for Democrats, who view Lugar’s ouster as an opportunity to pick up a longtime Republican seat.

Congratulations on finally getting rid of Dick Lugar tonight!

Do you have any idea how Mourdock will do vs. Donnelly in the November election? Supposedly the democRATs are "salivating" over the chance to run against Mourdock...

101 posted on 05/08/2012 7:32:44 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in peace, and thank you, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Mittens is a beaten dead horse. He can’t out Liberal Soetoro. Mittens needs the mushy middle and the ‘Rat base to vote for him. Not gonna happen. The GOPe is gasping for air.


102 posted on 05/08/2012 7:33:39 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
Mittens is a beaten dead horse. He can’t out Liberal Soetoro. Mittens needs the mushy middle and the ‘Rat base to vote for him. Not gonna happen. The GOPe is gasping for air.

I'm sure that sounds even more tragically poetic in the original French.

103 posted on 05/08/2012 7:35:27 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Congradulations’ digger....Indiana is leading the way for sure! Toast to you!


104 posted on 05/08/2012 7:41:35 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

What? Wait a minute! This is impossible! I heard that the Tea Party is a spent force! The MSM said so!

(snicker)

I wonder if Lugar is now going to run as an Independent ala Murk that cow fom Alaska.


105 posted on 05/08/2012 7:44:55 PM PDT by Ronin (Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life - Rep. L. Gohmert, Tex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

See my post 21


106 posted on 05/08/2012 7:46:02 PM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
I would have banned Perry, Bachmann, Romney, Paul, Johnson, etc. from the primaries and had only Caine, Santorum and Gingrich ~ lifelong Republican Conservatives.

You let these RINOS into the party they think they got a right to take over the place. They have to be blocked from the top slots

107 posted on 05/08/2012 7:46:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Sen. John Kerry called the loss:

....... “a tragedy for the Senate” ....and a “blow to the institution.”

Music to my ears! Cry dem blues, Johnny!

Was music to me as well...Loved it!

108 posted on 05/08/2012 7:47:16 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
They are making noise about spending a lot of money ~ but that remains to be seen. I think folks should take some time to analyze the downticket results to see WHO WON and by WHAT first.

The judicial races may be instructive.

109 posted on 05/08/2012 7:48:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

http://grassrootsidgop.wordpress.com/list-of-states-with-open-and-closed-primaries/ ~ Indiana is listed as OPEN PRIMARY which means Democrats could have crossed over in large numbers to make sure Romney got in.


110 posted on 05/08/2012 7:51:04 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
That's been a real shame in this. The TEAParty crowd have this bias against traditional and social Conservatives.

Time for them to purge their leadership of false leaders perhaps? Maybe OVERDUE!

111 posted on 05/08/2012 7:53:55 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Yeah. It even sounds real good with a country accent. Try it!


112 posted on 05/08/2012 7:56:17 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I’m so happy that New World Order Trash is out...how many more left?


113 posted on 05/08/2012 8:01:47 PM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Prop 8 was also an amendment to the CA constitution and a single gay federal district court judge overruled it.

I know... And the fag governor Schwarzenegger and his fag administration and Kalifornia's Democrat fag legislature shrugged, failed to appeal (or even give a damn), and that was the end of that. Kalifonia voters apparently also shrugged and went back to sleep. Or meditated, whatever.

That is not likely to happen in North Carolina. If a single Democrat fag judge "overrules" the amendment it WILL be appealed.
And appealed and appealed, again and again.

114 posted on 05/08/2012 8:07:38 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
Now watch the Republican elites run away from Mourdock. In fact I fully expect them to campaign for his Democrat opponent. Just like they did in 2010.

They'll come damn close to doing so. You already had people like John Cornyn trying to scare Conservatives by claiming that it would be difficult to hold that seat if Lugar was defeated in the primary. It's going to get dirty, but I'm glad to see Lugar gone. Now we just need to do this a lot more, and not just in 2012, but in 2014 and 2016, because a lot of folks not up for election are feeling too dadgum comfortable in their RINO ways.
115 posted on 05/08/2012 8:07:50 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailback

[Indiana has a sore loser law. Stick a fork in Lugar, he’s done.]

yep, Joe Miller tweeted about the sore loser law earlier. Lugar cannot pull a Murkowski.


116 posted on 05/08/2012 8:14:54 PM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This is a tremendous win, and yet another sign that the electorate is wide awake. The tea party is certainly alive.

My only argument in this coverage is that Mourdock is no upstart. He is already a statewide elected official. He’ll be a huge asset in Washington because he has the bedrock conservative principles. Beyond that, he is no newbie.


117 posted on 05/08/2012 8:17:01 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Mourdock will do well. Good over all ticket with Pence for Governor, Mourdock Senator and Todd Young for Congress from out district. In 2010 my county elected one hundred per cent Republicans....Thirty years ago couldn't even get a person to run on the Republican ticket....Then there was Clinton. So many people were so disgusted by his behavior they left the Rats. We have a large Lutheran community who found they could run and win by switching parties. And so even our good D sheriff was defeated.

Donnelly is from the area where Obama was fraudulently put on the ballot. Lots of problems IIRC he was even gerrymandered out of a district. weak....weakest from a weak area.

118 posted on 05/08/2012 8:33:15 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Good riddance! Should have happened 18 years ago.

Yup. Lugar is a RINO and IIRC a gun grabber, too. Is the replacement pro-gun?

119 posted on 05/08/2012 9:03:08 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All; Steelfish
"Richard Mourdock is this year's Ken Buck..."

Let's see... Mourdock is the state treasurer so he's already won statewide before and Ken Buck was a county D.A. running statewide.

Yeah those are exactly the same. /s

I understand why Daniels supported Lugar since working for Lugar gave him his start in Indiana politics. It's a loyalty thing. One of the Senate's octogenarians, Lugar could've stepped aside gracefully. Maybe having defeated the incumbent a the primary helps Mourdock with momentum in ways become heir apparent does not.

120 posted on 05/08/2012 9:08:01 PM PDT by newzjunkey (I advocate separation of school and sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Obama will lose Indiana by 17%, but they think the Dem challenger can pick up the seat? Don’t see that at all.


121 posted on 05/08/2012 9:13:23 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Sen. John Kerry called the loss....... “a tragedy for the Senate” ....and a “blow to the institution.”

(...Things are looking up this evening....)

Yea...cracked me right up when I read it...so did your response!

It's so great to laugh and enjoy these wins....refreshing hardly says enough for me! I got tired of carrying my chin on my foot...really!

122 posted on 05/08/2012 9:16:14 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

“I expect Lugar to run as an independent,”

Can’t happen. Indiana has a sore loser law.


123 posted on 05/08/2012 9:36:42 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This is GREAT news — but you do realize, of course, that the Republican Establishment will do everything in their power to make sure this seat goes Democrat. They did that in 2010 and in races before that.


124 posted on 05/08/2012 9:44:24 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Sen. John Kerry called the loss....... “a tragedy for the Senate” ....and a “blow to the institution.””

YES...
A Republican who votes with Democrats on the most important issues got whacked by his constituents for it.

Find another patsy, john. this one is TOAST...


125 posted on 05/08/2012 9:59:18 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

great news. another payoff for us conservatives. we have to continue to dig deep and give more to our own.


126 posted on 05/08/2012 10:01:03 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Excellent. And I’ll be even happier when Utah tosses Orrin Hatch like yesterday’s garbage.


127 posted on 05/08/2012 10:09:39 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver; All

“After Florida, there was an exit poll that said he was pulling about half the Tea Partiers then.”

A lot of Freepers forget that the Tea Party just isn’t Christian Conservatives.

In my area, the “Tea Party” is mostly Constitution Party, and Libertarian types. And many DEMOCRATS turned out for the Tea Parties, too, realizing they had been sold down the river, and that Obama wasn’t who they thought they were voting for.


128 posted on 05/08/2012 10:15:04 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

To top off a good day, Jackie Walorski won in the Indiana Second! (South Bend)


129 posted on 05/08/2012 10:19:25 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Indiana is listed as OPEN PRIMARY which means Democrats could have crossed over in large numbers to make sure Romney got in.

Oh sure. That must be what happened. Otherwise the true choice of rock-ribbed conservatives, Dr. Ron Paul, would have won the Indiana primary walking away.

130 posted on 05/08/2012 10:52:07 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I expect Lugar to run as an independent,”

Can’t happen. Indiana has a sore loser law.

**
For crying out loud, Lugar’s had ENOUGH time in our government!! Time to put on the plaid shorts and lock him up forever at the old RINO country club.


131 posted on 05/08/2012 10:53:00 PM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
That's been a real shame in this. The TEAParty crowd have this bias against traditional and social Conservatives.

You fail to understand the tea party. The tea party movement is centered on the understanding that massive deficits, excessive taxation and regulation, and cronyism will cause America's economy to collapse.

Social conservatives who are wise will be glad for the tea party movement and will help pitch a big tent in the near term while seeking converts to the social conservative cause over the medium term. Foolish social conservatives with no wisdom and no game will demand that the tea party movement be anti-abortion and anti-gay from the start and in this way weaken and divide it.

Obama, the leftists in general, and Satan are counting on the short-sighted social conservatives to save them from the tea party movement.

132 posted on 05/08/2012 11:03:39 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TBP
...but you do realize, of course, that the Republican Establishment will do everything in their power to make sure this seat goes Democrat.

I am sure getting tired of all of this defeatist crap.

Buck up, folks! What would Limbaugh do? What would Reagan do?

133 posted on 05/08/2012 11:09:35 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
In my area, the “Tea Party” is mostly Constitution Party, and Libertarian types. And many DEMOCRATS turned out for the Tea Parties, too, realizing they had been sold down the river, and that Obama wasn’t who they thought they were voting for.

Fools see this as a problem. Wise people know that this is a golden opportunity.

For the first time ever there are millions of formerly solid Democratic voters asking themselves where the money is going to come from to close the deficit and fund the entitlement programs.

Previously the 'Rat politicians simply said that the corporations and the top earners had plenty of money to pay for everything and more, and that all we needed to do was raise taxes. Obama is running on this. Yet many Americans for the first time are seeing that this just isn't so. Now is the time to show these folks what self-serving liars the leftists are.

134 posted on 05/08/2012 11:16:41 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

It really depends on the TEA party. Some are TEA party in name only. Some are inventions of the democrats. Some are Ron Paul. Some are tax only. Some are full conservative - economy, social, defense.

That is why you must be very careful as to knowing what any particular TEA party is about.

They did a survey of TEA parties and found that social conservatives made up 47% of the TEA parties they surveyed. Social conservatives were the largest group within the TEA parties, just as they are the largest group within the republican party.

Survey | Religion and the Tea Party in the 2010 Elections
Nearly Half of Tea Party Movement also identify with Christian Conservative Movement

http://publicreligion.org/research/2010/10/religion-tea-party-2010/

Both the democrats and the RINOs would love to kill off both the social conservatives and the TEA party. For all their talk about social conservatives being a problem, given what has happened all around tonight, I’d say those marxists and socialists are not having very much success.


135 posted on 05/08/2012 11:26:35 PM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
ending the career of one of the Senate’s most pragmatic politicians....

Awwwwwww. Isn't it sweet how The LaLaLand Times comes to Sen. Lugar's defense?

I'll bet they were so-o-o-o-o-o looking forward to endorsing him over whoever his RAT opponent would've been.

136 posted on 05/09/2012 3:13:39 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Congratulations Hoosiers!!!


137 posted on 05/09/2012 3:31:40 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Excellent news.


138 posted on 05/09/2012 4:33:30 AM PDT by snowsislander (Please, America, no more dog-eating Kenyan cokeheads in the Oval Office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o; Steelfish; MinuteGal; maggief; STARWISE; onyx; Liz; WVNan
Hoosiers=
Voter ID law (check)
Sore Loser law (check)
Balance the Budget (check)
Replaced “D” Bayh (check)
Dumping the Rino (check)

Did I mention before, the totally democrat county I moved to thirty years ago, elected 100% republicans to office in 2010? (And to think: Bill Clinton and Monica started the switch/best thing WJC ever did)

139 posted on 05/09/2012 4:37:24 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Yeah, i do think you would understand why social Conservatives would demand you give up killing babies and that sort of thing FIRST.

"cause otherwise you can't get their votes.

And just how many Democrat voters are you going to find to make up the deficiency?

I"d think giving up the baby killing thing would be very easy to do IF you are really serious about politics and want to win. (not to be all that cynical, but good gosh "fiscal soundness' requires we have a constant, steady supply of new citizens).

140 posted on 05/09/2012 5:03:55 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

You might say a Lugie was just ex-Specterated....


141 posted on 05/09/2012 5:16:54 AM PDT by mikrofon ('Snot the Right guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

142 posted on 05/09/2012 5:26:30 AM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

The Establishment did that in at least three or four races in 2010. They’re the reason the GOP doesn’t control the Senate. They lost on purpose.


143 posted on 05/09/2012 6:02:00 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth
Mittens is a beaten dead horse. He can’t out Liberal Soetoro.

That's who Etch a Sketch really is.

144 posted on 05/09/2012 6:03:11 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

Yes, as I said, they lost a number of races on purpose.


145 posted on 05/09/2012 6:06:25 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
Indiana has a sore loser law.

I'm sure the GOPe can find a way around it.

146 posted on 05/09/2012 6:08:58 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

***Mourdock was endorsed by Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann, and Lugar had the backing of the party establishment, including Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).***

How d’ya like them apples, GOPe?


147 posted on 05/09/2012 6:09:02 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Forget the GOP and build the Constitution Party, because the status quo is no longer the way to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I think TX will nominate Dewhurst because it has heard of him; the people there don’t know Cruz, who can’t match Dewhurst in name ID, which means everything to the uninformed.


148 posted on 05/09/2012 6:23:51 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

That may be asking more than the people of UT are capable of doing.


149 posted on 05/09/2012 6:30:02 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Past is prologue: The American people again let us down in this election cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I think our Republic would be better served if instead of demanding that the tea party movement be lock-step unified over abortion and gays, and beating people about the head with the phrase “baby killing”, conservatives instead talked about the Constitution, the original intent of the founders, federalism, and the proper role of judges. We need to overturn Roe v. Wade but we also need to ditch Social Security and a lot of other New Deal and Great Society garbage. If we focus on the tactics of the leftists (i.e. judicial activism) rather than any specific results (e.g. mandatory legal abortion) we are striking at the real root of the problem and doing so in a way that allows us to pitch a big tent and get the numbers necessary to accomplish our goals.

On the other hand we can just stand outside on street corners waving placards with graphic photos of aborted fetuses and scream at people that we are first and foremost opposed to “baby killing”.

Again, Obama, the leftists, and Satan are hoping that we define ourselves with that second approach rather than the first.


150 posted on 05/09/2012 6:38:46 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson