To: Nowhere Man
And that’s barely even close at all. They were/are both Veeps and not even born in the 30s.
It’s weird, isn’t it? 10 years of births and yet not one of those millions (tens of millions?) of people ever lead this country.
I wonder if there are other instances of that earlier in our history.
My parents were older than yours, born in 1926, but they didn’t have children until the late 50s, rather old for that time.
39 posted on
05/09/2012 4:45:15 PM PDT by
jocon307
To: jocon307
And thats barely even close at all. They were/are both Veeps and not even born in the 30s.
Its weird, isnt it? 10 years of births and yet not one of those millions (tens of millions?) of people ever lead this country.
I wonder if there are other instances of that earlier in our history.
My parents were older than yours, born in 1926, but they didnt have children until the late 50s, rather old for that time.
I know, that is something, they barely have a toehold on the leadership at all. It seems like in the Presidency, we went directly from the World War II generation to the Baby Boomers.
49 posted on
05/11/2012 7:25:39 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson