Don’t have to believe everything in the article to come up with “Justified.”
Unless his wife was drunk or otherwise impaired, the man had no business trying to stop her.
What, being a liberal voter doesn't automatically qualify as "impaired"? ;)
BTW, I agree with you. Just thought I'd chip in some humor.
“Don’t have to believe everything in the article to come up with “Justified.””
You do have to believe enough of it.
Have you not seen enough blatant media lies to question THEIR stated cause of the incident?
Why are we assuming that THIS politically charged article is telling the truth?
Sorry, I disagree. What he did what stupid, and in some states might even be illegal. But she had other options. She could have gone inside until he left; she could have called the cops to make him leave, etc. So while I agree he did not have a right to try to prevent her from voting, that did not make her "justified" to use deadly force against him. I have no sympathy for him, but she still needs to be held to account for her actions as well. She should be charged with assault with a deadly weapon and possibly mayhem.
If so, then “Zimmerman is GUILTY”, right?