Skip to comments.NOW president returns fire on Limbaugh
Posted on 05/09/2012 9:48:41 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
NOW president returns fire on Limbaugh
By DYLAN BYERS | 5/9/12 10:12 AM EDT
Terry O'Neill, the president of the progressive National Organization for Women (NOW), is returning fire on conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, who yesterday called her organization a "faux feminist group" and its members "femi-nazis," and launched an anti-NOW Facebook page called "National Organization for Rush Babes."
"I don't think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate. I don't think they would want to associate themselves with his bullying," O'Neill told me this morning. "I don't think conservative women would want to associate themselves with his vitriolic attacks."
Limbuagh yesterday described National Organization for Rush Babes as an effort to counter NOW's "Enough Rush" campaign, which encourages advertisers to boycott his program. Limbaugh said NOW was wrong to think it speaks for women: "If there was ever a group that speaks for an almost infinitesimal minority of women, it's them," he said. "Rush Babes for America [is] dedicated to the millions of conservative women who know what they believe in: family, American Values, and not being told by faux feminist groups how to think."
But O'Neill said that conservative women, while they may agree with Limbaugh on matters of policy, would not support his "bullying," citing his recent attacks on Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, who he referred to as a "slut" and a "prostitute."
"I think there are extraordinarily few people who agree with what he said about Sandra Fluke," she said. "I don't think women want to watch Sandra Fluke having sex in a video tape for the sexual gratification of men."
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Train wreck for the NAGS on the horizon!
Every time they engage him they lose. Every. Single. Time.
He has GOT to love this!
She sure knows a lot about conservative women.
When you throw a stone into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit.
Yea and all the “likes” on his FB are fake....
LOL! popcorn time for sure!
>>I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate<<
As usual, libs comment on Rush while never having listened to even a minute of his show. One thing Rush does NOT have is “hate.” The worst you’ll get is (appropriate) disdain.
And for the bullying now nags to accuse Rush of bullying is the ultimate in irony (and projection).
The fact that they were absolutely silent during the Clinton rape/Lewinsky scandal blew whatever credibility they had, completely and irrevocably away.
Any woman with the time and need to associate with NOW should get a life and shake the garbage out of her head.
Isn’t Rush’s FB page called....”Rush Babes for America?” typical “journalist”....can’t get the name right...or didn’t want readers flocking to it!!!
NOW is intentionally missing the intended humor, but they are right in the narrow wording they chose - no woman (or man) wants to see Fluke ever again, especially not unclothed. They're also right that Limbaugh was totally unfair to question the morals of a woman who spends thousands of dollars a year on birth control. While at the wholesale condom prices a woman that active should be sensible enough to seek, her claim equates to nearly a hundred encounters per day, it's possible that she's financially reckless and spending that much on as few as ten sessions daily. She's a parasite, but if her local WalMart is getting the money, she's not a prostitute.
“Free speech for me and not for thee?” That’s what they’re saying.
She was quoted as saying, “I don’t think...” The trouble is, conservative women do.
The more the NAGS whine...the harder I laugh.
Rush loves to be engaged by the whack-jobs. Now it gets fun...
“I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate. I don’t think they would want to associate themselves with his bullying,” O’Neill told me this morning. “I don’t think conservative women would want to associate themselves with his vitriolic attacks.”
Then why not wait till the “Rush Babes” page fails....
Hate this, Hate that. It’s just so old
“Hate”? Don’t these NAGS have any new words to use? That on is kind of tired out. NAGS HATE Rush, HATE conservatives, HATE Republicans, HATE Americans, HATE marriage, HATE babies, HATE, HATE, HATE. Nothing but HATE.
NOW defended a serial rapist in the White House because he supported abortion on demand.
NOW defended a serial workplace sexual harasser in the White House because he supported abortion on demand.
NOW defended an administration that used the Nuts and Sluts attack strategy against sexual abuse/assault/harassment accusers because Clinton supported abortion on demand.
NOW is NOT pro-woman. They are pro-abortion and anti-choice.
P.S. The NAGS have to associate themselves to Rush as no one would know who they are otherwise, they’d get zero perss.
“... Debbie Mayonnaise-Hair Schultz’s...”
LOLOLOL! Chicken salad sandwich on-the-monitor-and-keyboard alert!
Really! Pass the Popcorn!!!! YES...NOW is composed of the “haters”——they hate men and hate God and hate the fact that they have to give birth if children are to exist—the future.
They hate the Design of Man and Woman by God. (Marxists in their shriveled souls to destroy the Natural Family—so they can control the minds of all children who will not be connected to a loving mother and father who form their Christian worldview. They learn to hate men and God and become dependent on government handouts with no father in the home. Those kids grow up populating prisons and gangs in the search for God the Father).
They are trying to destroy the natures of both women and men-—which has destroyed—literally—millions of children.
NOW is the most illogical and evil communist group, along with the communist homosexual radicals. Their reason to live—is to destroy the family unit which destroys the children—the building block of civil societies—so government gets overloaded with useful idiots who collapse the system.
Yeah, it was gone the minute they began celebrating their "Love-Your-Body" Day, which is an orgy of wearing sweat pants and eating "comfort food" while exercising all-day hate against thinner women who know how to wear makeup.
“I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate.”
So, since when did this femi-nazi phoney and her faux feminist harridans speak for conservative women?
In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell
“I don’t think women want to watch Sandra Fluke having sex in a video tape for the sexual gratification of men.”
So is she admitting that Fluke has a sex tape out there? Maybe Fluke mad a sex tape for the gratification for Lesbians?
DITTOS on That!
OOOH! That’s brilliant. Go ahead, start a fight with the guy who OWNS the airwaves for at least three hours a day and five days a week!
Go Rush Babes!
As a conservative woman, I would like to point out that on this issue, like all issues, this woman does not speak for me. Rush is absolutely right and if I had facebook, I'd be a Rush babe.
Typical ROCKIN post!
—Any woman with the time and need to associate with NOW should get a life and shake the garbage out of her head.—
Well, to be fair, most women show up to their meetings in pairs so it’s killing two birds with one stone. It’s a meeting and it’s date night all wrapped up into one.
My cat already licked off the chunks. But thanks, LIB!
Please allow me to modify your statement.
When you throw a stone into a pack of pigs, the one that squeals is the one that got hit.
#24 Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.
All you need to know is in the first 3 words of her statement “I DON’T KNOW”....end of story!!!
Joined this morning! Come on conservative women on facebook - lets roll those numbers out!
“Women only want to associate themselves with OUR hate, not Rush’s”
Is that the message?
“I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate...”
I don’t have much in common with radical lesbos.
I think the NORB will have more members than NOW by the end of the week
NOW only cares for women when they spout the DNC talking points.
Women like Sarah Palin can be referred to as B*tch, C*nt, Pitbull with lipstick, etc.
NOW is anti-woman, but dumb broads don’t realize the Socialists are lying to them.
RushBabesforAmerica started on Monday of this week? Is that correct?
Well, when I joined this morning the count was at 24,781 or something to that effect. Now it’s at 25,121 and rising rapidly. I’d say he’s had a good couple of days! hahaha
On this one Rush is Josh Hamilton and the NAGs are the Orioles pitching staff. Rush *will* hit this one out of the park. Again and again.
Note to director:Makeup not working,dim lights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.