Skip to comments.Jesus Never Said Anything About Homosexuality [Obama Sez HE is smarter than Jesus, Moses, St. Paul]
Posted on 05/10/2012 2:19:06 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Only when you presume you know the full scope of what is being said.
I'm reminded of the supercilious atheist who insisted the Bible is refuted by God referring to bats as a form of "bird" ... as if our modern taxonomy and nomenclature is some absolute fabric of universe.
When guys who design and build nuclear weapons for a living write books on the validity of Genesis (Gerald Schroeder), the wise student is cautious to conclude the matter settled.
Because people are wicked and perverse by nature.
Unlike a lot of people, I am pretty tolerant of God and dont pretend to know what he thinks of things.
Funny. "A lot of people" are tolerant of those who pretend not to know what God thinks, even after He's made His divine opinion quite clear.
Youre welcome; somebody pointed that out to me years ago, and it left an impression. It is just a thought, though if someone considers His conversation with the Samaritan woman at the well (about her adultery) there is no reason to deduce that Jesus would support a “homosexual lifestyle” by any means.
I don’t see how straights invented “gay marriage”; homosexuality is an obvious mental illness with no rational explanation for the bizarre behavior. Straights invented contraception thousands of years after Spartans (or Sodom & Gmorrah) did the “gay thing”.
What makes you think this was God the Father who appeared to Moses at Sinai?
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. (John 1:18)Paul writes in Colossians 1:15:
[Jesus]..Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every create:
"No man has seen", "invisible"... God (the Father) cannot be seen. So, who have we seen? Either the pre-incarnate Jesus Christ or Jesus Christ. Consequently, Jesus Christ, the Word of God, spake all these words to Moses.
It's not true that straights invented contraception thousands of years after Spartans (or Sodom & Gmorrah) did the gay thing. The first recorded act of contraception was in Genesis 38, an episode which originated the term "Onanism," which means turning away from the natural procreative function of sex.
Contraception is condemned in the Didache, an early Christian document which was written probably even before the Gosepl of John, in the late first century.(Link.)
Natural marriage is man/woman, creates a marital bond, and typically results in childbearing if the people are physically healthy. Contraception, on the other hand, facilitates promiscuity and adultery, undermines marriage, and deliberately avoids a normal union and its natural results.
That vitiates marriage to the point where is is disappearing among straight people (half of the children born to women under 30 in 2011 were born out of wedlock). It also tends to redefine marriage as something which essentially "about" the gratification of adult desires, rather than something that is essentially "about" creating a family by begetting and raising children. That redefinition suits the ideology of gay marriage to a T.
What is in my little KJV Exodus 24:15-18 is as follows:
15 And Moses went up into the mount, and a cloud covered the mount.
16 And the glory of the Lord abode upon mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it six days: and the seventh day he called unto Moses out of the midst of the cloud.
17 And the sight of the glory of the Lord was like devouring fire on the top of the mount in the eyes of the children of Israel.
18 And Moses went into the midst of the cloud and gat him up into the mount; and Moses was in the mount forty days and forty nights.
But what it doesn't say is that Moses actually saw God.
However, that has little to do with the issue at hand.
Thumb through to Leviticus 18:22 Where the Lord was speaking to Moses: 22: Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abombination.
That is a pretty clear statement of disapproval.
But back in Genesis 19:24, the ultimate 'statement' is made: Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.
Seems like a pretty clear sign the Lord didn't approve of the goings on there.
You need to read ahead to chapter 33 which preceeds the second tables of stone:
And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen. (Exodus 33:22,23)
However, that has little to do with the issue at hand
I think it is precisely the issue. People do not recognize that Jesus Christ is God; and that it was he who spoke the Law to Moses; and that he will judge the unbelieving at the great white throne using his law which is eternal.
You make a good point: The three are one, therefore Jesus did speak to the issue. Thank you for your patience.
“That vitiates marriage to the point where is is disappearing among straight people (half of the children born to women under 30 in 2011 were born out of wedlock).”
Laws & attorneys destroyed marriage between straight people; when T-shirts are sold asking: “Why get married? Find a nasty lady and buy her a house.” that says about all we need to know about the state of marriage today. Till boredom or the slightest setback do we part (with the financials stacked against the guy).
“It also tends to redefine marriage as something which essentially “about” the gratification of adult desires, rather than something that is essentially “about” creating a family by begetting and raising children. That redefinition suits the ideology of gay marriage to a T.”
Separating the sexual act from procreation isn’t the root of “homosexual marriage” (though they come to the same conclusion - no children); it is simply another symptom of the post-Christianity period of our history. “Homosexual couples” often like to buy children to “play family”.
You refer to the fact that some gay couples like to acquire children and "play family" as a kind of accessory, an expensive luxury like raising prize dogs. But before the triumph of the contraceptive mentality, having children wasn't just a lifestyle option: it was a physical fact, one of the central facts of sexual commitment. That's why the urgency of "commitment" was there at all.
If it weren't for small dependent human beings being generated from sex, nobody would have ever thought of marriage. It would never have been invented. Why would people ask for religious solemnities or civil licensure or social approbation, for doing sterile jiggity with their excitable bits?