Skip to comments.Rasmussen : Romney 50%, Obama 43%
Posted on 05/11/2012 6:31:42 AM PDT by sunmars
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows Mitt Romney earning 50% of the vote and President Obama attracting 43% support. Four percent (4%) would vote for a third party candidate, while another three percent (3%) are undecided.
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
He’s not giving up. He wants the four more to complete the destruction and transformation.
If he loses, you can bet he will do the very things you talk about between November and January.
Right now he’s trying to get his base riled up. I am sure he has plans X, Y and Z to try and ensure his victory if things look bad as we get closer...ie. watch for war with Iran.
We simply have to beat him anyway.
America at the Crossroads of History
The man who despises America
So you're either openly supporting Obama or you're delusional. In either case, we've got nothing more to say to each other.
This race went from leans Obama to Romney’s to lose in one fell swoop!
Thanks Obama for revealing you gay self :)
North Carolina and Virginia are no longer in play after Homo-Bama’s announcement :)
Go vote for obama w a smile on your face. Obama, Biden, Pelosi, mobacca, clooney, msnbc, huffington post, DU, reid are your allies remember?
They would have stopped long before then. Probably Salt Lake City, or somewhere else in Utah.
Agreed. We need a big push to shut down public employee unions in general.
“Who would vote for Squidward over obama?”
Squidward is my favorite!
The only one here openly supporting a socialist is YOU.
As I told the other guy...
Between the two of us, the ONLY one that is actively supporting a socialist is YOU.
I appreciated your link to “Why I will support” on your post and agree with it.
Your kidding right?
Have the idiots in the gop hold the socialist they elected presidents feet to the fire?
They wouldnt hold GW’s “feet to the fire” WTF makes you think they will do anything other than lick romneys balls?
Take your potty mouth someplace else. No one here is interested in your gutter discourse.
its not any better, and arguably worse.
Think about this... The GOP is about to nominate a SOCIALIST as its candidate for president.
All this guy is gonna do is make sure that Obamacare gets fully instated as Robamacare. The gop congress that MAY have pulled the purse strings against the DEM socialist will go along WILLINGLY with the Republican SOCIALIST. WHY? Because hes a Republican thats why..
Think thats f”ing crazy? well.. look at yourselves... Your voting for a SOCIALIST because he is a republican....
blah blah bah
define no one....
You mean the idiots supporting a socialist because he has an R behind his name?
Dont really care what you guys think.. You’ve already proven that your judgement is fatally flawed.
You are actively and openly taking actions encouraging an Obama 2nd term.
I am ABO
Question for you - if you were a democrat in WV - would you have voted for the inmate over Obama?
I would have.
YES! I would have voted for an inmate over OBAMA! But only if that inmate wasnt a SOCIALIST.
Romney isnt an inmate... Hes a socialist.
I mean, really let that sink in...
The GOP is headed towards nominating a SOCIALIST as its candidate for president.....
What kind of drugs need to be taken for THAT to be OK?!
It cant be allowed to happen or we are Friggen TOAST! and if they do nominate his ass we have to make sure that he never steps foot in the WH as president...
We all HATE obama because hes a socialist... But at least those blinded by party lables in the GOP will fight him. But god F’ing help us when we have a Socialist president with an R behind his name... The GOP will line up behind him... Guaranteed...
Even worse... Once they got one through they will get more... We will be SCREWED.
I cant, in good conscience let that happen.
Obama had to come out in support of gay marriage cuz he was going to Hollywood for some cash and the handle was going to be low as well as the take.
The announcement that he was for gay marriage was for fundraising purposes. He thinks he has more of a chance being for gay marriage with the CA$H! that comes from that...than if he didn’t get the cash.
Is there any doubt in any one’s mind that Sarah Palin would wipe the floor with Obama or Romney? Not mine.
In 2008 Ras had Obama up 52%-46% in their final poll. I don’t think that represents an example of a too close to call instance. I do recall that during the campaign they had some polls that showed McCain and Obama essentially tied.
If I vote for Romney (whose views are more like Obama than for mine) how am I doing anything but giving support to those views? And if I live in a state which Romney has no possible way of winning, why vote for him?
However, if I live in a battleground state, I may indeed have to hold my nose and pull the lever to rid us of Obama. The closeness of the polls will determine whether I have to join and grab the rope to pull him across the line.
I am not an indifferent voter, I vote in local and national elections. In 2008 in support of Palin I went around work and door to door in my neighborhood registering voters. This time I will support state candidates with money and signs. I will just avoid the topic of Romney.
I just realised that in this electin I dont want to call either of them by name.”
Yes, that sort of summarizes most of our feelings around here...even those who want the GOP guy to defeat obama.....
And when Romney is revealed, correctly, as the father of gay marriage at the state level, it won’t matter at all.
Even if it’s not true, I think I will give that to my Obots to use in their talking points.
You could refer to them as
That is one BIG woman...if she is a woman.
How’s that gay marriage thingy working out for you, Mr. President?
If there is anyone who is capable of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, its Romney.
If I didn't live in a swing state, I might even partake of that luxury, but since I do, there is just one question which seals it for me:
Which Supreme Court nominee was easier to stop? Harriett Meyers? Or Elena Kagan?
The former was just an unqualified crony, the latter a hardcore Marxist.
Who will pay for all the lavish vacations if they don’t get a second term?...oh my!!
If Obama selects a Van Jones or Deval Patrick, ultra Marxists, even if we have majorities in the Senate, will they have the balls to stop it? When the libs and media will call us racist if we block it? Can we really muster the votes to stop it under that pressure?
Then, under the guide of diversity, he selects an Arab American... Again with the threat of being called racist, she gets seated....
We then have a 6-3 lib majority that even Reagan reincarnated can't help us with... And they will torment us for 20-30 years.
The stakes are too high to sit out and prove a point... Another 4 years of Obama, unleashed, will rip apart ouf country... Permanently
Sure she is. She is drooling thinking of the vacations she can take without having to worry about criticism harming re-election chances.
With Romney and the stances he has taken on the issues and a conservative House and Senate to hold his feet to that fire, we can actually see this thing turned around in large in the next 4-8 years.
Even Axelrod is smart enough to figure that one out for himself.
He is a POL and will easily be held to those issues because he wants his presidency to be validated, he wants to turn things around and be viewed as the guy who did so, and so he will want all eight years.
The make up of the House and Senate is changing. 2010 made large gains in having real conservatives there. 2012 will add even more. They will hold him to the fire, despite what you think.
At any rate, with those stances and a majority house and senate we have an excellent chance to turn things around with a President who is openly siding with us on most issues...despite his past.
We have absolutely none of that with Obama...in fact, he will do exactly the opposite by whatever means he can.
Most people, particularly the conservaitve leaders who are now sitting and talking with Romney see this, believe it, and are intending to hold him to it. it's only a very small percentage who are so steeped in their anger, dislike, and mistrust of Romney who will not.
And, as unfortunate as it is that he is the banner carrier, he is...and I am thankful that most people will get behind him to get rid of Obama and put together that scenario I just spoke of.
On top of all of that, some free advise...(and its free so it may be worth nothing to you, that's your call)...all your swearing and offensive language and name calling of those you do not agree with you here will neither change any of this a whit, and certainly will not bring others around to your way of thinking. Most of us on the boards are aware of what is happening and who these players are and what their backgrounds are and are not making our decisions lightly, any more than you are. So try and keep that in mind when you treat those decisions with such derision.
Yep, she will be going all over the globe with her posse to live the lifestyle of the rich and famous.
The pathetic, blubbering idiots don’t realize that he holds all of them in utter contempt and is their worst enemy. They may as well be chickens swooning over Colonel Sanders.
Well put. I"m not a Mitt fan, but I think if we force a Republican House and Senate on him, he'll stay somewhat conservative."
Yeah, it really is absurd when you put it that way. I guess I will have to put a set of Vise-Grip pliers on my nose and vote for Romney. It can’t hurt much worse than voting for McCain did.
I would vote for Gary, the snail that meows, before I would vote for Romney.
“I think they had McCain Obama too close to call”
Rassmussen’s final poll had Obama 52 to 46. Almost on the button! He also has NC and IN too close to call. Again, right on the button.
What about Sandy, I see a lot of Sarah Palin in her.
“Too many lemmings that will still vote for him.”
Yes, as some wise person said, “We MAY survive Obama but what we CANNOT survive is having voters stupid enough to elect Obama.” No fiction writer could have ever imagined a story as bizarre as what is happening in America now. Our government is controlled by people who would have been locked in insane asylums in the days of my youth. As a matter of fact I used to service office equipment in some of this state’s mental health facilities and I observed mental patients who would have been far more desirable in any office up to and including the presidency than the current crop of Democrats and even many in the GOP.
Wow, good point. But that is something to fear no matter when he leaves office.
I don’t care for Mitt, but I don’t like 0bama more. Not only must we get rid of 0bama, we have to get rid of his czars and all the other moronic, anti-American jerks in this administration.
0bama out would be a good thing. Then we’ll work on Mitt and replacing him in 4 years.
Good point. Did Republicans even put up a token opposition to Obama's SCOTUS appointments? With Harriet Miers, Republicans said not only "no" but "Hell NO!" and we got Samuel Alito instead.