What?
I go thru all the trouble to uncover facts about MORMONism, find the most pertainant things and accent them, make them large enough so that older eyes can read them; and then you say this?
HERE!
Other than TMI; you've no excuse left.
"... he used a stone called a "Seers stone," the "Interpreters" having been taken away from him because of transgression. The "Interpreters" were taken from Joseph after he allowed Martin Harris to carry away the 116 pages of Ms [manuscript] of the Book of Mormon as a punishment, but he was allowed to go on and translate by use of a "Seers stone" which he had, and which he placed in a hat into which he buried his face, stating to me and others that the original character appeared upon parchment and under it the translation in English."
"When Joseph was translating the Book of Mormon [I] had occasion more than once to go into his immediate presence, and saw him engaged at his work of translation. The mode of procedure consisted in Joseph's placing the Seer Stone in the crown of a hat, then putting his face into the hat, so as to entirely cover his face, resting his elbows upon his knees, and then dictating word after word, while the scribes Emma, John Whitmer, O. Cowdery, or some other wrote it down."
(W.W. Blair interview with Michael Morse,Saints Herald, vol. 26, no. 12June 15, 1879, pp. 190-91.)
"The manner in which this was done was by looking into the Urim and Thummim, which was placed in a hat to exclude the light, (the plates lying near by covered up), and reading off the translation, which appeared in the stone by the power of God"("A New Witness for Christ in America,"Francis W. Kirkham, 2:417.)
Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Does the number of your post count as 2/3 of THE number ???
I don’t read but a hand full of your posts, the short ones, I don’t what that one was supposed to be either.
You don’t need to make every post of yours a huge, impersonal, cut and paste, history dump, I’m on your side and I just scroll right past them because they are rarely more than just massive spam rather than something that you personally wrote to the poster.
Even the post I am answering is one of those, and it is supposed to be a response to me already pleading with you to quit doing it to me.
By the way, people can wear glasses at the computer, or adjust their own text size, I doubt that people are spending the day looking at blurry threads that they can’t read, while hoping that they may come across one of yours, where you put the type “large enough so that older eyes can read them”.