Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush: ‘I’m for Mitt Romney’
ABC News ^ | MAY 15, 2012 | Matt Negrin

Posted on 05/15/2012 9:35:12 AM PDT by RobinMasters

Mitt Romney has the support of George W. Bush.

“I’m for Mitt Romney,” Bush told ABC News this morning as the doors of an elevator closed on him, after he gave a speech on human rights a block from his old home — the White House.

Bush’s endorsement isn’t a surprise, given that Romney is virtually the Republican Party’s nominee. But the 43rd president has been absent from the 2012 campaign and hasn’t made any public comments showing his support for Romney.

Romney did get the formal backing of Bush’s parents, President George H.W. Bush and Barbara Bush, in March.

People who worked in the Bush administration say they doubt the former president will be campaigning for Romney this year. Even in his post-presidential life, Bush still gets a lot of the blame for the poor economy, according to polls, though he has become more popular since leaving office.

Bush was speaking today at an event to promote the George W. Bush Presidential Center’s campaign for human rights activists around the world.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: TheGunny

I know, I know, you don’t need me. You also won’t need the many others who are making the same decision, either.

Yeah, the GOP don’t need no grassroots or anything. We can get it done on the strength of Romney’s sparkling personality alone.


41 posted on 05/15/2012 12:05:41 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Anybody but Obama and Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

” - - - But seriously, the GOP establishment will not allow an open convention in Tampa - - - “

That is because the RINO Political Party is VERY comfortable designing a path that INSURES failure.

Failure leaves tracks, especially when the path they are following takes them into the financial abyss.

Change to a RINO might bring about their extinction, in their minds.

Party on, RINOs! Party on - - - - -


42 posted on 05/15/2012 12:12:41 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I would NEVER do that to Col. West.


43 posted on 05/15/2012 12:14:26 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“We need a “Day in the life of Mitt Romney” thread.”

No we do not. Those sickening masterbatory Dubya threads were beneath contempt. If you want hero worship start your own Mitt themed website.


44 posted on 05/15/2012 2:28:12 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
We need a “Day in the life of Mitt Romney” thread.

No we do not. Those sickening masterbatory Dubya threads were beneath contempt.

It appears you don't like those "Day in the life" threads?

Come one Kantian...Get on board!

We can post attractive pics of Bush and Romney winking and nodding! Think of the fun it will be banning those who dare post derogatory comments!

45 posted on 05/15/2012 6:13:00 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

That hit my funny bone...Har har.


46 posted on 05/15/2012 6:25:21 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

"Oh my God! Dubya's clearing brush on his ranch!"

47 posted on 05/15/2012 6:48:11 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Digger
How about, Because of me ya'll got Obama.

There is absolutely no doubt about that. History will judge him among the top five worse possibly ranking an equal to Carter in that category. He finished off what his Dad started which was abandoning conservatism and completing the Nelson Rockefeller Liberalization of the GOP.

48 posted on 05/15/2012 7:09:52 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

What a hoot Kant...


49 posted on 05/15/2012 7:11:12 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
brother/sister, Im not saying that at all. Im not thrilled about Romney for many reasons, and yes, his former positions on issues that are important to me matter. That said, I will do everything in my power to see Barry S thrown from the White House. I do consider R a far better option than BS. Even if we were to re-take the Senate but kept BS in the oval office we would have a stalemate at best. Not good enough. I dont agree that R and BS are equivalents, not even close.
50 posted on 05/16/2012 8:20:59 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Pure grade A tripe! We got BS because we had a worse than horrible candidate in McLame. If McLame the war hero had any fight in him at all, HE would be president and all of this would be moot. I happen to think that GWB will be remembered more for the 9-11 attacks and how he led the nation through one of our darkest moments. I for one am proud to have served in the Marines under his leadership.
51 posted on 05/16/2012 8:28:19 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
Department of Homeland Security was who's idea? Patriot Act was who's idea? TSA was who's idea? Faith Based Programs was who's idea? Tieing the hands of troops in combat with Lyndon Baines Johnson/Robert McNamara R.O.E.'s was who's idea? Keeping a downsized and demished military level even after our nation was attacked on 9/11 was who's idea? Wherre was the help? A Secretary of Defense who created the Hollow Carter Military who did that? Don't tell me Rummy was great. He lead us into the Carter Military.

Allowing good Marines Soldiers, Airment, and Sailors to be Court Maritaled on THE WORD OF THE ENEMY NATION was who's idea? Feel free too worship him. I'll call him the president he really was. LBJ the second of Texas.

52 posted on 05/16/2012 12:54:38 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
If either Bush had stuck with the Reagan Doctorines we would not be in the mess we are in today. There was not one penny difference between Bush and Clinton policies. The Bush's sat precedents Obama is using against us. The Bush political beliefs follow that one the late Nelson Rockefeller and Gerald Ford. BTW as for McCain? LOL Oh My Sides hurt from laughing. McCain was the one who pushed all of W's bad policies and none of his good ones.

As for the 911 attacks? There is but one way to fight war. It is an absolute go in with clear and precise military goals and kill and destroy with prejudice until unconditional surrender or the enemy ceases to exist either or and nothing more. Anything else doing it any other way is wrong. It was GW Bush who in 2000 said he was against nation building. HE LIED!!!

53 posted on 05/16/2012 1:07:03 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Wow! First, go skim the foam from your mouth. Second, I don’t agree with with much of your perspective as there are NO perfect human beings, thus there are no perfect candidates. Third, as much as I love Reagan, he was indeed fallible and made mistakes. Finally, I think GWB was an honorable man. He made mistakes, and yes, we are still living with many of them. I blame the congress for most of it and GWB for not standing up to his own party. AND...there isnt a president who has EVER served that didn’t say things in a campaign and then found it extremely difficult to do in the real time execution of his duties. I forgive him and understand many of his motives. BTW, he and Rummy both were for the most part respected and held in very high esteem by those men serving in the Armed Forces.


54 posted on 05/16/2012 4:06:24 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
I was active duty for Rummy's first tenure as Sec of Defense. Maybe that is why I see him quite different than you. When W brought his name up as Sec of Def I knew we'd been had.

Rummy was first Sec of Defense under Gerald Ford. During that time the decline which would also later become and be known as The Hollow Carter Military started. Things did not magically fall apart as soon as Carter took office that does not happen that fast. Things were in shambles morale and discipline wise before Carter ever raised his right hand. It's a part of the military you likely never saw because when you joined in what 1987 {looking at your FR page} it was a complete turnaround from early 1977.

The daily muster reports which were then placed into a combined list going to each department showing AWOLs for the day were high. These typically weren't guys who simply had went on a bender & shacked up somewhere coming back in the next day or so. These were ones who were not coming back.

In 1976 -early 1978 if you wanted out of the military all you had to do was a 31 day AWOL and report to another command for processing out. You might see a court martial, most likely no brig time, were given a General Discharge, and free to go no more obligation. I am not making this up. Many took that out. If you run across lets say a coworker now in his mid to late 50's who says he did a couple years in the service in that era and is very vague about when, where, and how long, you can almost bet he doesn't have an Honorable DC and had deserted. The standard enlistment obligation was 3/3 or 4/2.

It wasn't till somewhere in the early 1978 time frame that things started slowly swinging back toward the military which you served in. First thing ended was the AWOL to civilian policy which had began under Rummy a policy that under Bush tenure he tried again to start up. The second change came in addressing discipline and morale.

You're a Marine so you might possibly understand this. Several things are a must for morale. Topping the list is discipline and honoring tradition. Our dress blues in 1976 looked like bargain basement Navy Officers Dress Blues. On a ship they were highly dysfunctional and a PITA to stow properly and care for. In late 1979 the traditional blues and whites {crackerjack} were restored as dress uniform of the day for enlisted. In 1976 you did not hear traditional Pipes being done on ships. In 1978 every Bosun had a pipe and had again mastered the calls. The notion you could just walk off the ship was also ended with re-instituting the Liberty Pass Card. You either had to have a Liberty Pass or pier Pass to leave the ship. Only your E-5 or above had possession of them. He could use it to reward and punish. Retention had became a serious issue but was being addressed seriously and aggressively. The going bonus for a Snipe in 1980 was $15K, next rank, and possibly shore duty for a couple years. My Chief followed me around my last 6 months LOL.

There was also a little heard about program which brought back into active duty on a volunteer basis some Old Salts {E-7-E-9} to help reestablish some order. We had one of them in my division before I got out. There's an old saying if you want a man to act like a sailor then treat him like one.

I'm not saying it was fun or there weren't serious issues because there was plenty of both. But I am saying there was a huge difference in what I saw in change by the time my EAOS was up in Oct 80. Most of it was for the good. Despite all the issues we faced several things did not happen. We never failed INSURV, PEB, ORE, or failed to do Lite Offs on demand. We stayed mission ready. Our C.O's were not hung out too dry as scapegoats for congressional de-funding of shipboard maintenance.

The difference between Reagan and GW Bush? In 1982 a hard recession hit. Reagan ceased the opportunity and from that most empty Billets had became filled. How do I know? Because I tried to go back in in late 1982 because there were no jobs. I was offered $15K in late 1980 and was considered in a critical rating. I was told in 1982 that positions were filled and a long waiting list. Lucky for me I had full G.I. Bill {not the same one of today} to fall back so I went back to school and also enlisted in the Army National Guards for a year. V.A. had me on contract digging graves while going to school so I got by between the three.

On September 11 2001 our nation was attacked and our defenses were in an unprecedented since Pearl Harbor stand down posture. To understand why I say that you would have had to know the posture earlier. We were and still are today at 1996 End Troop Strength Levels. That was the Golden Opportunity to actually help our military recover from damages Poppy, Clinton, and Congress had inflicted in manpower and program cuts. That Golden chance was not used. The results are troops deployed for one year deployments four four times. We can't blame that on the DEMs because the Moderate GOP leaders in control did this too them.

Let me ask you something. If Bush picked such brilliant ones for Sec of Defense then why did Obama keep Gates? I bet he would have kept Rummy also. You forget it was GW Bush whom in his 2000 campaign said he and Mr Gore were not that far apart on most issues.

55 posted on 05/16/2012 6:00:36 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; BillyBoy; RobinMasters; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; don-o; randita; ...
"Amazing, did someone think the republican president from the Bush dynasty was going third party this year."

Haha, indeed. I don't think anyone is surprised other than the 5 or 6 people who still think Bush was a "true conservative".

Now if he wanted to help Mitt he should have endorsed Obama.

56 posted on 05/17/2012 2:21:24 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson