Skip to comments.Private navy planned to counter pirate raids
Posted on 05/16/2012 12:23:43 PM PDT by bkopto
A private navy costing US$70 million (Dh257m) is being set up to escort merchant ships through the pirate-infested Gulf of Aden.
It will comprise a fleet of 18 ships, based in Djibouti, and will offer to convoy merchant vessels along the Internationally Recognised Transit Corridor (IRTC).
This is the world's most dangerous shipping lane, between the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea. The fleet will be operated by the Convoy Escort Programme (CEP), a British company launched by the international shipping insurers Jardine Lloyd Thompson (JLT) and the Lloyds of London underwriters Ascot.
Full funding will be in place by the end of next month, and the CEP hopes the fleet will be operational by December.
"The shipping industry needs to stand up and be counted," said Angus Campbell, the CEP's chief executive and a former director of Overseas Shipholding Group, the world's second-biggest listed oil tanker company. "The time is now, not in four or five years' time."
Piracy in the region is costing the global economy an estimated US$7 billion a year. For the ship owners alone, every vessel sailing through the waters off Somalia is charged additional insurance premiums of between $50,000 and $80,000.
Ships opting to carry their own armed guards can be charged an additional $18,000 and $60,000 per voyage by security companies.
Although the European Union is spending more than 8m (Dh37.94m) a year to maintain a naval force in the waters - EU NavFor - its warships still cannot provide close support to all merchant vessels.
The CEP, however, offers substantial savings to owners as well as protection from pirate attack. The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums, or hire security.
Instead, they will just pay a flat $30,000 to $40,000 per ship in the convoy.
The CEP is planning to buy seven 150-foot fast patrol boats, understood to be ex-Swedish Navy, and has already earmarked 11 former offshore supply vessels for purchase and conversion.
The ships will be equipped with fast semi-inflatables, called ribs, an array of non-lethal counter-measures, and 0.50 calibre heavy machine guns. They will be operated by a crew of five and carry eight armed security personnel each.
The programme will result in convoys of up to four merchant ships closely escorted by one CEP craft along the IRTC, with additional CEP ships in support, covering east and west-bound traffic.
Once in operation, the force will capable of escorting up to 470 ships a month through the Gulf of Aden, equivalent to about 25 per cent of current traffic.
"Our crews will undergo intensive training in how to implement a graduated response. We will be compliant with maritime law and will observe the International Maritime Organisation conventions, such as the Safety of Life at Sea treaty," said Mr Campbell. "We have had detailed discussions with the Royal Navy, who were a little concerned at first, but are now supportive, as are the British government."
Sean Woollerson, a partner in the marine, oil and gas division of JLT, said the description "private navy" did not apply to the CEP fleet.
The aim is to stop the pirates before they reach the merchant ship, and the emphasis is on non-lethal measures. Use of offensive weapons will be a last resort. "This is not a navy," said Mr Woollerson. "What we're trying to be is a deterrent force. Prevention is within our reach."
The plan has been put together during the past three and a half years and now involves 21 companies, including law firms, auditors and risk managers, as well as JLT and Ascot.
The CEP has agreed with the Cyprus Maritime Administration for its vessels to sail under the island's flag.
"Anything that can prevent piracy in this area is to be supported," Pottengal Mukundan, the chief executive of the Commercial Crime Services arm of the International Maritime Bureau, told the British newspaper TheMail on Sunday.
JLT is a leading British insurance business and was first established as a division of Jardine, Matheson and Company, which was founded in Canton [now known as Guangdong], China, in 1832.
Although floated off, Jardine still owns 40 per cent of JLT, which specialises in risk insurance, such as shipping, kidnap and ransom. JLT insures 14 per cent of the global shipping fleet and is a traded on the FTSE 250 Index.
"While this peril has always existed on the high seas, the scale and intensity of piracy in the Gulf of Aden has focused the attention of the shipping and insurance industries on this exposure," said the company's website regarding its involvement in the programme.
The aim is to stop the pirates before they reach the merchant ship, and the emphasis is on non-lethal measures. Use of offensive weapons will be a last resort.
The cannons dont thunder theres nothing to plunder .
Can you imagine the first ship owner that says "no thanks, I don't need insurance around Somalia, I'll depend on the Somalia Navy instead".
No? Me neither.
Better treat ‘em right ... otherwise, you’re just training future pirates. If I’m not mistaken, the original Pirates of the Spanish Main were disgruntled former privateers.
I’d rather have the Russian Navy patrolling the waters. After all, sharks gotta eat, too.
will eye patches be mandatory this time around?
Wow! Will they be taking passengers willing to work for free?
the problem with a private navy is . . . what will it shoot at after the pirates are gone?
I wonder how long before the first Letters of Marquee (or whatever the modern equivalent is) are issued.
The Merchant Marine version of Blackwater.
This could become a sport like Marlin fishing or Tuna fishing. There is nothing like the thrill of the hunt. Instead of rods and reels the sportsmen can use 50 caliber machine guns to get their prizes.
“The cannons dont thunder theres nothing to plunder .”
...I’m an over-forty victim of fate. arriving too late. arriving too late...
Letters of marque and reprisal anybody?
Betcha this private navy would catch more pirates than the politically correctness bound US navy would.
Imagine the final look and last words of a Somali pirate as the side dropped and the concealed gun fired!
It ain’t an either-or, but contracting this navy might give a merchant a discount on his piracy insurance.
“Betcha this private navy would catch more pirates than the politically correctness bound US navy would.”
Amen to that!
Not sure that’s such a good idea.
These “security forces” are advertizing that “Use of offensive weapons will be a last resort” and their maximum firepower will be a .50 cal.
Any astute Somali pirate worth his miraa will immediately buy a 23mm or larger and pop the security escorts before they are within .50 cal range.
You might as well be wearing a blue helmet.
I forgot to refer to the “Seeadler” a WWI German Navy commerce raider.
For the love of God, why?????????
Idiots. If you want more lives lost or more kidnap victims....you want millions and millions more in losses from these floating filth, by ALL means just swat their little hinies.
Blow them out of the water into red vapor.
IMO a mistake. Hit them hard the first time.
OTOH it will promote escort job security as the pirates aren't eliminated. They will try again, requiring more escorts.
I am waitng for a pirate safari to be put together.
“OTOH it will promote escort job security as the pirates aren’t eliminated. They will try again, requiring more escorts. “
It’s a business like any other. If you actually solved the problem, you’d be out of business. LOL
“The Merchant Marine version of Blackwater.”
I half expected to see Eric Princes name in the article somewhere :)
The USS Constitution was built mainly to deal with the Barbary Pirates, also Religion of peace pirates.
That’s damn near 2 million a month in gross revenue. Not a bad business plan.
And then we have this from Wikipedia (I know, Wikipedia sucks)
In January 2011, the Associated Press reported that Prince had taken on a new role training a force of 2000 Somalis for anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden. The program is reportedly funded by several Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates and backed by the United States. Prince's spokesman, Mark Corallo, said that Prince has "no financial role" in the project and declined to answer any questions about Prince's involvement. The Somali force will also reportedly pursue an Islamist supporting warlord.
The Associated Press quotes John Burnett of Maritime Underwater Security Consultants as saying "There are 34 nations with naval assets trying to stop piracy and it can only be stopped on land. With Prince's background and rather illustrious reputation, I think it's quite possible that it might work."
Exactly right. Or a portable R2D2 mounted above the bridge, take it off of a ship going one direction and put it on one going the other direction. Package deal complete with operators, make approaching a commercial vessel so dangerous that no one would attempt it, and buy enough of them to cover all the ships in transit.
Did someone say "escort"?
The article stated the economics working as a replacement cost.
The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums, or hire security.
Instead, they will just pay a flat $30,000 to $40,000 per ship in the convoy.
” I am curious what happens to the pirate captives? Will they be sent to Western countries to be assimilated into their societies? “
The Somalis we brought here have started crime waves everywhere we dropped them.
Sounds like a long term revenue generation protection racket, rather than a pirate elimination service, to me. It keeps pirates at a distance, alive armed and ready, as long as you pay.
wners wouldn’t have to pay the “additional premiums” for piracy coverage
I read it the same. Sorry I wasn’t clear.
I’d shiver her timbers.
Especially consider that it’s being RUN in part by the noted ship and specialty insurance firm Lloyds of London. (The one that rings the Lutine Bell when the loss of a ship is reported.) Sounds a lot like Lloyds will offer the option of piracy coverage WITH a contract to this navy, for cheaper than piracy coverage without it.
yo ho ho and a yeehaw
I guess we will have to disagree.
I read “The CEP will buy insurance and use that to cover the ships in its convoys, so owners will no longer need to pay premiums”.
to mean no longer paying piracy premiums, not a discounted piracy premium. It is included in their fee.
Cheers (and a bottle of rum, yo ho...)
AAARRRGGG,,, She’s a fine looking wench . . .
Well the idea that CEP is buying insurance for its navylet sounds even weirder. And it wouldn’t have anything to do with insurance for the shippers contracting their help... or would it? Anyhow, if backed by Lloyds isn’t that redundant? Perhaps some words got misplaced here.
Sounds like a package deal. You hire the Mini Navy and you also get coverage for cases where even it failed to halt pirates. But we’ll have to wait to see the details spelled out in a formal offer. Surely it will show up on the Lloyds website...?
Huh? Did they stop the pirate cruises?