Skip to comments.Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'
Posted on 05/17/2012 10:58:09 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama's then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
If you really believe all those agencies have no clue who he is then please ping me.
I for one do believe he was born in Kenya for the simple fact that he has hidden so much of his past. But some questions do remain:
1. If he was born in Kenya, raised in Indonesia, then Hawaii, why does he speak in a perfect American accent?
2. Why would this hospital in Hawaii cover for him? Call me crazy, but I sure as hell would not put my job on the line for this putz.
BHO LIED about it if he was born in Kenya. He’s one big fat lie. He’s one big fat marxist.
Well now Warren Buffett has just purchased 63 American newspapers.
D’ya think the ‘media’ is independent and is allowed to be truthful?
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 must be rescinded. There can never be independence when one man, or one corporation owns all sources of information.
You’re both wrong!
Three types of citizenship are recognized by our government: native born; naturalized; and citizen-by-statute. All have equal rights. All can serve in Congress, either as a Representative in the House, or as a Senator in the Senate.
The following link will take you to the governments own Immigration Service web page describing the three types of citizenship.
Natural Born Citizen is NOT a type of statutory citizenship as per the Federal Government. Natural Born is ONLY an eligibility requirement for the U.S. Presidency per Article II, Section 1, clause 5, of the U.S. Constitution, and requires, as per the Founders, the President to be born in the United States (jus solis) AND of citizen parents (jus sanguinas).
No one has the RIGHT to be President. The eligibility requirement of Natural Born Citizenship (jus solis + jus sanguinas: born in the U.S. of U.S. citizen parents) must be viewed as a means to prevent split allegiance for any President of the United States.
This definition is supplied in the Supreme Court decision and holding of Miner v. Happersett (1974). It has been used in a minimum of 25 SCOTUS cases.
Is my daughter a natural born citizen?
“Im sure millions of people in the U.S. know this and they Just. Dont. Care.
...and there’s a wholebunchalotta them folks right here at FR!!”
Nothing has disgusted me more here for a few years.
Left wing freaks at FR are even worse than “in the wild”.
He looks more like FMD than the drunk driver.
I guess in 1991, Obama was a “birther”.
He found probable cause for forgery and fraud regarding Obama’s long-form and draft registration. There was a press conference announcing this - but it was upstaged by Breitbart’s sudden death the same day. Breitbart had spoken on the phone with Joe Arpaio about Arpaio’s findings and evidence less than 5 hours before he died.
Rush Limbaugh also received a bomb scare the day of Arpaio’s press conference. And the media that reported anything about the press conference mostly just reported that the DOJ is charging Arpaio with civil rights violations and Arpaio is an attention hog who wants to be re-elected. Not one article from the MSM described the actual evidence that the posse presented. If you google Mike Zullo (the commander of the Cold Case Posse) you can find web pages that talk about what they found. The videos they presented at the presser were narrated by Mark Gillar who is at http://www.teapartypowerhour.com I believe. Or maybe http://www.markgillar.com .
Your daughter is ineligible to be President. Deal with it!
This is a best case scenario for Obama, how would his Literary Agent know this info to Publish it, other than it came from Obama’s mouth? Somehow someway Obama’s minions and the Press will blow it off, but it is just another one of the thousand cuts that will bleed the Kenyan commie to death.
"At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens,"in Minor v. Happersett (1875)
Without first coming to that determination, the court could not have determined if Virginia Minor was a "citizen" who had the right to vote.
The reason Barry sites in the Oval office today, is not due to not knowing who a "natural born Citizen" is...but rather, due to fear and political expediency. Nobody in a position of power to do anything wanted to rock the boat on the first (half) "black" President, potentially loosing their job, their broadcasting license or worse. It became the 3rd rail.
it’s in the islamic faith that lying is okay if you lie for allah.
Throw the imposter out!
All the above is an opinion. No information was received from outside sources.
Here is the Tribe/Olson opinion on the issue:
Per request from Senator McCain two researchers presented a report on March 19, 2008, declaring McCain to be eligible.
The Constitution does not define the meaning of natural born Citizen. The U.S. Supreme Court gives meaning to terms that are not expressly defined in the Constitution by looking to the context in which those terms are used; to statutes enacted by the First Congress, Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 790-91 (1983); and to the common law at the time of the Founding. United Suites v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 655 (1898). These sources all confirm that the phrase natural born includes both birth abroad to parents who were citizens, and birth within a nations territory and allegiance. Thus, regardless of the sovereign status of the Panama Canal Zone at the time of Senator McCains birth, he is a natural born citizen because he was born to parents who were U.S. citizens.
Indeed, the statute that the First Congress enacted on this subject not only established that such children are U.S. citizens, but also expressly referred to them as natural born citizens. Act of Mar. 26, 1790, ch. 3, § 1, 1 Stat. 103, 104. and
Historical practice confirms that birth on soil that is under the sovereignty of the United States, but not within a State, satisfies the Natural Born Citizen Clause. For example, Vice President Charles Curtis was born in the territory of Kansas on January 25, 1860 one year before Kansas became a State. Because the Twelfth Amendment requires that Vice Presidents possess the same qualifications as Presidents, the service of Vice President Curtis verifies that the phrase natural born Citizen includes birth outside of any State but within U.S. territory. Similarly, Senator Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona before its statehood, yet attained the Republican Partys presidential nomination in 1964. And Senator Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 not long after its admission to the Union on August 21, 1959. We find it inconceivable that Senator Obama would have been ineligible for the Presidency had he been born two years earlier.
Mike Zullo of Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse has confirmed that the media was threatened out of reporting on this issue, by Soros. Doug Hagman had reported some details regarding this, and Zullo corroborated those claims.
Here’s a post about this, which has links you can look at:
I speak with a perfect US-American accent and I was raised in Puerto Rico for 18 years. You’d never know I was Puerto Rican.
“Somebody wants this to come out....who gains from this coming out?”
You know the answer...The Beard Clintoon
Kindergarten records would have probably been a good place to look but from what I understand or recall is that his file in the school he attended are mysteriously missing.
She was 17. 14+5=19 moron.
“Kindergarten records would have probably been a good place to look but from what I understand or recall is that his file in the school he attended are mysteriously missing.”
I thought they were merely “widely discredited”.
Big media has been overtly “correcting” and ridiculing the perception that Hussein was born anywhere but Hawaii, and just can’t seem to get their stories straight on a non-existent BC.
SO MANY COMPLACENT “FREEPERS” ON THIS.
Everyon please save this story on your hard drive and capture a screen shot before it’s scrubbed.
It's a good thing for Obozo that he probably doesn't have any afternoon appointments to cancel.
Wasn’t there an OLD alphabet news report saying he’d been born in Kenya that Big Media spent a little while ridiculing before it disappeared?
I guess you have made up your mind regardless of the other possibilities.
What about the children of US military born abroad? Should they be denied the opportunity to run for President because their parents were serving abroad in defense of their country? It makes no sense whatsoever. Regardless, the courts have never made a definitive determination.
Real or Fake ones? Inquiring minds want to know.
In you attempt to make you daughter eligible to become President is astounding. Have you no shame sir?
Sorry, it is not settled law.
Here on WBT in Charlotte Joe Pollock is about to come on.
If this is something he knew about, they probably have a SH*TLOAD of stuff that they’re gonna drip drip drip.
Breitbart is gonna make Kurt Cobain and Bradley Nowell look like minnows in the posthumous fame department.
Doesn't matter if Barry was born in the US. Just as you correctly point out that children born overseas to U.S. citizen parent(s) obtain U.S. citizenship via statue, the same goes for foreigners' children born here. They inherit their parent(s) foreign citizenship. By birthright. Unless SR. was not his legal father at birth, and even if born in the Lincoln bedroom, Barry was born a British subject. He inherited his foreign fathers foreign citizenship at birth.
How do you think those 300,000 to 400,000 anchor babies born each year to illegal alien parents get US passports, access to Medicaid, food stamps, etc.?
Via a pure, 100% bastardization of the intent of the 14th Amendment.
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).
The United States did not limit immigration in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. Thus there were, by definition, no illegal immigrants and the issue of citizenship for children of those here in violation of the law was nonexistent. Granting of automatic citizenship to children of illegal alien mothers is a recent and totally inadvertent and unforeseen result of the amendment and the Reconstructionist period in which it was ratified.
Post-Civil War reforms focused on injustices to African Americans. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.
In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:
"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:
"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."
The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.
Supreme Court decisions
The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.
Over a century ago, the Supreme Court appropriately confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called "Slaughter-House cases" [83 US 36 (1873) and 112 US 94 (1884)]13. In the 1884 Elk v.Wilkins case12, the phrase "subject to its jurisdiction" was interpreted to exclude "children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States." In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered not an American citizen because the law required him to be "not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance."
The Court essentially stated that the status of the parents determines the citizenship of the child. To qualify children for birthright citizenship, based on the 14th Amendment, parents must owe "direct and immediate allegiance" to the U.S. and be "completely subject" to its jurisdiction. In other words, they must be United States citizens. "
And it continues.
Because of a liberal bastardization of the meaning and intent of the 14th Amendment, children born here to FOREIGNERS who aren't even DOMOCILED here and who happen to be here ILLEGALLY, are currently afforded citizenship. It's wrong. It was never meant to be that way, and is yet another wrong that needs to be righted.
You better save that before it’s scrubbed.
The supreme court has changed its interpretation of the definition of natural born citizen from time to time over the last 200 years. It is not really known if a person’s status depends on the interpretation of today or the interpretation at the time of their birth. It has never been tested before.
But in your case, even if your child had been born 50 years ago I think she would still be a natural born citizen because you are and your wife was a naturalized citizen.
At one time, the law read that the FATHER of the child had to be a natural born citizen before the child would be considered natural born. Then they started relaxing the requirements.
at the time of obama’s birth, the requirement was kinda screwy. It stipulatted that the father had to be a citizen OR the mother had to be at least 19(or something, I’m going by memory) and lived on US soid for at least X number of years and herself be a natural born citizen.
I’m going by memory. At any rate, he did not meet the requirements at the time of his birth since his mother was under the age requirement and his father was not a citizen.
So we are left with a debate as to wether or not obama’s citizenship status is determined by the CURRENT interpretation or by the interpretation in effect of the time of his birth.
Which he was.
An American citizen can be from Oslo without inferring that he's a Norwegian national.
Let's give it a rest and let the communists, liberals and progressives twist the language to make non-existent points.
Unless you're prepared to argue that, in addition to being an nineteen-year-old American "anthropologist," Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was also an official American diplomat.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
The hospitals in Hawaii are forbidden by HIPAA from releasing info on patients. They have never claimed that he was born there. There was a letter where Barack Obama supposedly said he was born at Kapiolani and Kapiolani had it on display and used it in a fundraising letter but Kapiolani would never confirm that it was accurate. And the White House would never confirm that Obama had actually signed that letter (which had the White House seal on it).
However, according to Mike Evans,HI Gov Neil Abercrombie said that he had gone to the hospitals with a search warrant, looking for a record of Obama’s birth and could not find anything anywhere. Evans reported that on various radio stations. Shortly afterwards Evans denied that he had said any such thing, but the audio shows that he did.
“...who gains from this coming out?”
Bibi and the Israelis...
Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother:
A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the persons birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the persons birth. The mother must be genetically related to the person in order to transmit U.S. citizenship.
Because you say so? That's some hubris!
When I saw it was blue, the first thing that came to my mind was: “Is this BO’s BLUE dress?”
It is the first truly tangible evidence we have. We can hold it in our hands and collectively hand it to the judicial and legislative branch of government.
“Was he lying then or is he lying now?” will become as well known as “What did he know and when did he know it?”
Nah, the media only vets conservatives. Homomarxists get a bye.
Let me guess which media outlet, which hardcore journalism dig this mystery man’s background up, after years of hard digging, fearful of their lives etc etc ......
If it were settled law, then Obama wouldn’t be in the WH. Nor would the Tribe/Olson opinion on McCain even be necessary.
‘And the father is....’
‘Dats riight, dats riight! I dun told ya’ll!’
‘Oh lawd, hep me, hep me...puhleeeeeze!!!’
According to the information given (yours and outside sources) there is a grandson born in the US of a citizen of the US and a person of another nation elegible for President of the United States (btw - grandson is mine and my spouse). Why not have the question of eligibility addressed by the SC regarding zer0 and my grandson? It has been tried to bring it before the SC hasn’t it? Thought Alan Keys tried.
But at some point the Drive by’s will sell out for the Beard for no other reason than to hold the White house for the CommieRat Party.
Seems the 'wisdom of the day' - wisdom, so called - is that a challenge would 'invite' a Constitutional crisis that our Country could not withstand(!).
This makes a perversion of Reason, of course; given that we are watching daily; our Constitution being shredded; and our Country being destroyed; with every new Executive Order. Of course; anyone with an IQ higher than 'dirt', knows that without our Constitution; America is NOT recoverable.
Do not doubt more have shared 'the secret'; but wonder if the truth of Obama has been held; however; as a 'wild card'. . .and perhaps, now; they are ready to play it; and play it in time, to kill two birds (with one nativity story) i.e. get rid of President; who it appears, is hated by not just 'foe's; but also by many of his own loyalists.
There are NO friends; of course; in a den of thieves. . . Why not make a challenge against a President whose 'second term' is looking precarious. And yes, the convenience of losing Biden; without having to put him in a mental hospital or worse. . .
So, they just 'let' Obama 'finish'; Repubs we know on board for 'smooth'; and then the Dems usher in Hillary for a fresh 'NEW DEAL' in November.
Who knows; Hillary did get a new hair-do; and Soros did have that meeting. . .and Bill Clinton cannot keep stop promoting his own 'Economic Renewal' plan; while ripping Obama's. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.