Skip to comments.The Hand of Clinton in Obama revelations?
Posted on 05/18/2012 12:04:59 AM PDT by robowombat
In the age of instant communication Brietbart.com's revelation that Barack Obama was listed on his agent, Jane Dystel's brochure, as having been "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii" is already old news. This news, however, is simply too hot for the major media to ignore. I would expect Obama spokesman Jay Carney to lay off the "mistake" to some misguided publicist, but that will no longer work. For what this brochure reveals is that, regardless of where Obama was born, he has been manufacturing his biography from the day he hit the mainland. The emergence of this brochure two weeks after David Maraniss's revelation in Vanity Fair about Obama's composite girl friends and one week after the debut of Ed Klein's new book on Obama, The Amateur, suggests some media string-pulling beyond the powers of any conservative. Call me a conspiracy theorist -- a tag that has lost much of its sting in the last few hours -- but I sense the hand of Clinton. The Klein book, for instance, opens with an intimate meeting chez Clinton in which Bill encourages Hillary to do the seemingly unthinkable, namely challenge Obama in 2012. Someone at that meeting was allowed to talk to Klein, probably encouraged to talk to Klein. Indeed, the meeting may have been staged for Klein's benefit.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Klein was the editor of the New York Times Magazine, so he is no Republican, much less a conservative, despite the fact that Regnery published his book. The name of the book came from Clinton’s description of Obama...Amateur.
I suspect there are many Hillary supporters who were disgusted to the point of voting Republican who are behind a lot of these revelations.
Obama, the DNC, and his union thugs did her in, and her supporters have not forgotten it.
Does anyone here at FR truly believe Hillary Clinton can win this election if nominated at the Democratic Party’s convention?
She won’t be supported by the majority of black voters.
During the last presidential campaign, in August, 2008, Bill Clinton was asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be president.
Clinton's rather odd, cryptic reply:
"The constitution sets qualification for the president. And then the people decide who they think would be the better president."
Bill Clinton made this reference to the Constitution shortly after America's latest fad, the "community organizer" from Chicago, popped up out of nowhere and stole his wife's destiny by winning, in rather sleazy fashion including the shameless playing of "the race card", the Democrat nomination for President.
It has been my opinion since that time that the Clintons know something, and that it was they who quite deliberately fanned the flames of controversy over Obama's birth. Remember, it was a prominent Hillary Clinton supporter, Philadelphia lawyer Philip Berg, who launched *the first* Obama eligibility lawsuit. That lawsuit was filed in August of 2008, shortly after Bill Clinton made the curious reference to the Constitution when asked if he thought Obama was qualified to be President. Coincidental timing? Sure it was.
Feasible. I have been watching the Clintons since 2008 waiting on them to make their move.
Hillary Clinton, Alinsky protege, would be no better than Obama. That’s the saddest part of this whole scenario.
They will turn on him like a pack of hyenas and try to limit damage to the demorat party.
The rats, in their arrogance, drastically underestimated us.
We obviously aren't as stupid as they think, and we don't give up.
I'm watching several other forums, the reversal of opinion is amazing.
Rather than lay it all on the Clinton[s], with my conspiracy hat admittedly on, my suspicions lay with democrat apparatchiks due to party motive. With Gallop saying today that zer0 is likely to lose, zer0 doing poorly in many a poll, zer0 probably doing MUCH worse in the democrat politburo internal polling (ie, REAL non-push polling), there is a threat to the 'rats. The putsch of zer0's first 2 years is losing steam, but this is the best chance in 233 years (since the constitutional convention) to transform the nation. They must know that this relatively brief flirt with pure marxism will leave a mighty distaste for it being voted in anytime in the next 50 years, so to today's travelers, this is the time they have been waiting for - now or never. I think we're looking at a nasty next few months with 'rat factions, exposed with the likes of the Kenyan revelation, battling the zer0/Soros faction, as well as republican - the Rino's trying to win the votes of those that don't care about elections and many conservatives trying to pull Rotney over the finish line just to avoid zer0.
Hillary! would be much worse, and more dangerous to the republic, should they switch horses. There would be the incumbent advantage in 2016 should they win. She’d be just as sneaky agenda-wise, with EVERY move having a thin veneer of goodness and an agenda that moves them Forward©.
“We obviously aren’t as stupid as they think, and we don’t give up.”
I have little doubt that those rumors about the Clinton Administration trying to find an angle to get around the 22nd Amendment were true.
I don’t care whose hand/s are in it...I want this non-citizen removed from office. An office he NEVER should have had by our laws.
Damn those that allowed him to get this far...
No mistake about it, conservative activists do have influence if we keep chipping away.
Obammy gets about 90 plus percent of the black vote even though
That demographic has suffered worse than any other as a result of
If the dems dump him that percentage will NEVER again be a reliable
--H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
If anyone has behind the scene, buried dirt and/or info on Barry, it is surely Bill & Hillary.
“Does anyone here at FR truly believe Hillary Clinton can win this election if nominated at the Democratic Partys convention?”
She might not be able to win, but she must have a better shot than Obama.