Skip to comments.Mitt Romney holds fundraiser with manufacturer of the Morning After Pill
Posted on 05/19/2012 7:15:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
MIAMI, FLORIDA Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney scheduled a $50,000-a-plate fundraiser at the home of Phil Frost, the executive of the company that makes the Morning After Pill, on Wednesday night. Plan B One-Step is produced by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Frosts company.
How many state ballots are you on? Neither your site nor the selfgovernment site have that information.
Morning after pill isn’t a big issue with me, but for some it’s obviously a problem.
That said, I am sure this company makes other drugs of legitimate purpose. Sure lots of companies make birth control pills etc.
And that's enough to get me to vote for Romney. ;^) I'll take some chance over no chance. [Charles Hendrickson, post #250]
LOL! Here's your chance! Hope you win! [COBOL2Java]
(And here I thought Christians didn't believe in the evolutionary and gambling god of "Chance")...I guess the Sovereign Lord has perhaps been wearing thin on them lately, eh, Cobol2Java?
Oh, and btw, the "tokens" being utilizing in this great gambling scheme aren't the kind you'll find @ casinos.
Rather they are the "token lives" of the pre-born...child sacrifices offered up in the name of political expediency.
Since people don't want to sacrifice themselves -- to bite the bullet now in holding the GoP accountable -- they are willing to champion the great "conversion" year of the GoP when it became...
...more liberal & more leftist than LBJ...
...entrenched pro-abortion -- despite its empty platform rhetoric...
...champions of taxpayer-funded abortions...
Wow, that’s cool. Good luck.
Of course not. You've already escaped the world's most dangerous place to live (the womb).
But you're assuming a rather elitist posture then, are you not? (You've escaped the womb; why bother with the smallest that follow??? Is that it?)
Reminds me of the very same philosophy exhibited by a Sierra Club member I once had a discussion with. He was all into the ZPG (Zero Pop Growth) & NPG (Negative Pop Growth) public policy commitments.
He had no answer when I commented about his own rather elitist posture -- now that he had escaped the stranglehold constrictures of ZPG/NPG thinking.
I, in jest, suggested that if people were the REAL problem on Planet Earth -- including too many of them -- he could fall on his own ZPG/NPG sword and thereby decrease the "surplus population."
Hmmm...Even Dickens, heavily influenced by Christianity but not known for his personal Christian commitments, would call that lot "scrooges."
These Conservatives For Obama threads crack me up...but your enlisted noobs need improvement. I suppose sockpuppetry ain’t what it used to be..
Criticizing Obama is done in thread after thread.
Not vetting Obama by the MSM was their fault...Romney will be vetted, count on it.
Meanwhile, Romney who had no qualms oppressing MA citizens into becoming funders of abortion on a much greater scale -- funders one and all -- won't lift a damn finger to pre-empt us American taxpayers from upping our "contributions" into the abortion industry coffers via our taxes.
Three times, Romney's been in bed with Planned Parenthood (fundraiser attendance & Ann Romney contribution in '94; voters' guide in 2002; not vetoing the placement of a permanent overseer member from Planned Parenthood on RomneyCare).
Anybody expecting Romney to dismantle the whopping increases of taxpayer $ going DIRECTLY to pay for your local & regional pre-born chop shops is nuts!
Every day that goes by I am more and more convinced that I could NEVER vote for Romney, even if it means that Obama gets another term. I will vote FOR a conservative. I will NEVER vote for Romney. Not for nothing. Romney doesn't have enough money to bribe me to vote for him.
Romney is a product of open primaries and money generated by crony corporatists. He is no more a conservative than I am a Martian.
There's only one group of people supporting socialist pro-choice democrats here. And it isn't those who oppose Romney.
He never has before. Why would he do it now?
Those with principles always seem to elicit laughter and scorn from those without principles.
Such is life.
Wow. Post #79.
I said, wow.
That’s Glenn Beck’s list of “Do you know anyone like BO?”
I’ll tell you something, netmilsmom. If Romney could just deliver your post#79, in a straight voice, looking into the camera, and play that over and over again until the election, and did nothing else, he’d get 60% of the vote. Just that one post. That says it all.
But Romney, I’m afraid, won’t touch 95% of that stuff. Maybe won’t touch 98%. He’s a chickenshit, somewhat like McCain, though for different reasons.
McCain is feeble-minded. Romney’s just old party hack. But the results will be the same. A complete disregard for the truths of our post#79.
If he can’t articulate your post#79 (or something very close to it), he can’t win. Period. And he can’t. I’m 100% sure of that.
Three hundred some posts. How many are still defending
Romney as a Christian man?
The messages from Heaven say pray and fast for a miracle.
It could happen, believe.
I think a republican convention that looked like Chicago 68 would scare the livin’ ____ out of the GOP-e. We might take over the party just by giving them heart attacks.
Not that I love the NYT, but I’d love to see what they wrote. I think they’d take Mittens side and we’d be radical “militia groups”. Even Hannity would skewer us.
There is after all a “Tea Party Pinkie Finger” group and a “Tea Party Rabblerouser” group.
Aside: How goes the saga?
>>But Romney, Im afraid, wont touch 95% of that stuff. Maybe wont touch 98%. Hes a chickenshit, somewhat like McCain, though for different reasons.<<
I am praying that he can pull it off. That he can muster up something to help. Because if we get BO again, we are doomed.
Maybe Palin has something up her sleeve. Maybe a miracle will happen for us. Someone, anyone to push ole Mitt aside. I don’t know, but we can’t let BO get in there again.
The Big sites and Beck are working hard. Rush is smacking Romney around as is Levin. They are all working in their own ways. We need to be Breitbart and get in information out.
Short of the GOP running Satan against Obama, I will choose that nominee.
Your stance against abortion and those who support and encourage it is commendable.
The problems facing this country and a possible second term for the current administration transcends any 1 issue.
Be well and cast your vote to the wind. I cannot.
It would be nice if some posters paid even half as much attention to criticizing Obama, as they do tearing down Romney.
~ ~ ~
We already know BHO is a Herod, looks like Romney is one too.
Mormons aren’t Christian. Pray for their conversion.
“Thats Glenn Becks list of Do you know anyone like BO?
~ ~ ~
Hi, yes, about Glenn Beck, what is he ever going to say about
this one? How can he possibly defend Romney>?
Thanks for the link. And thank you for this thread.
FR sees Romney for who he is...
What does Glenn Beck, the Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum supporter say about Mitt Romney.
At least he’s not a Commy.
I agree with you. 100%
Lord Love you, my FRiend!
Romney is a RINO in RINOs clothing.
We’re going to have to do better than just “Tea Partiers,” frankly. The batch we sent with that label two years ago went native faster than you can say “K Street.” Much better vetting, with much more stringent accountability, is required, if we want to get our country back.
I’ve now read your campaign materials.
You can count on my vote, sir. If you’re not on my ballot, I will write in your name.
I’ll do my best to make sure you’re candidacy is noticed both before and after election day.
you’re should be your.
“But Romney, Im afraid, wont touch 95% of that stuff. Maybe wont touch 98%. Hes a chickenshit, somewhat like McCain, though for different reasons.”
Not likely. Romney is on a holy war to be the first Mormon POTUS. His team & surrogates will waterboard the dims if they have to. But don’t look for him to make it personal with Barry. Barry wants this election to be a high school popularity contest. We need to be focus on his record as POTUS and the economy to get the dim bulb “independents” to forget barrys celebrity and get on board the GOP train.
I know quite a few Republicans who are very unhappy with the nomination of Romney.
I believe I can convince more than a few of them that a vote for Tom Hoefling will make a larger sound than another worthless vote for Romney.
Good luck, sir.
What will a man give in exchange for his soul?
At least you got to breathe air for a while!
Are you still killing your unborn?
If I were an SLC MORMON; I'd be afraid to go to sleep at night!
"Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned;
and I will go still further and say, take this revelation, or any other revelation that the Lord has given,
and deny it in your feelings, and I promise that you will be damned.
Brigham Young - JoD 3:266 (July 14, 1855)
“Eat me last!”
You might be right but I think he’s far more of a RINO party hack than a Mormon. And a RINO party hack just doesn’t have any fight in him. Not against leftists. He can get mean enough against conservatives, sure. But not against leftists.
Are you still killing your unborn?
False 'prophets' like this...
... has brought CHRISTIANITY down.
Having had the same feelings for many years, it took a while for me to leave. I won't live to see conservatives really get their act together, but that doesn't matter as I will no longer be force feed their cool aid. My vote is important to me and I will cast it where my principles lead me. And at the present it looks like the Constitution Party and Virgil Goode.
The problems facing this country go beyond the economic ones; I'm sure we would both agree on that.
But most FREEPERs I've had discussions with severely downplay the...
...the moral decline,
...the moral spiral,
...the sin-that-makes-any-country-ripe-for-divine-judgment (or at least the withholding of blessings and the removal of divine protections)
...in favor of elevating the wallet, the bank account, the paycheck, etc.
Therefore, first of all, abortions -- plural -- (like STDs, like promiscuity, like porn, like etc.) are simply symptoms of severely deeper root problems...a country largely out of relationship with God and with Jesus Christ and moving further away...
I say that to those who think I'm elevating any one group of people out of proportion.
But secondly, and more importantly, your very language reveals that your attitude is more of a part of the problem than any solution in this area.
What do I mean?
Please note how you defined the pre-born: To you they are not your personal neighbors -- the most vulnerable in need of the highest levels of protection.
No, to you, they are an impersonal, abstract singular "issue."
In that sense, actually, I favor a move for us conservatives to move away from the singular word "abortion." It neither defines the mass plurality victimized in this holocaust; nor recognizes that the threat starts over for each pre-born the moment our God creates them.
You join enemies of the pre-born when you join them in reducing them to "single-issue" status.
Instead, may I suggest you treat them as your neighbors?
May I suggest you recognize that Jesus was once in those very stages of development we reduce to an "issue"?
May I suggest we call "abortion" for what it is -- and what the Bible calls it -- (unabated) infanticide?
Big John, right now Romney has the polls vote...and with the economics being what they are, that could stay the same into the Fall.
But what if the MSM and Democratic vetting of Romney is "successful" from their eyes? (They won't even need to make up things on Romney and on Mormonism; their problem is getting the word out...half of the people surprisingly still don't know that Romney's a Mormon and 90% of voters don't know what's most problematic about Mormonism from a POTUS perspective).
So the real question will be -- as of late-October polling data -- who is the person tossing their vote "to the wind?"
If Romney, poll-wise, looks like a loser...then I would maintain that people voting for a second-place also-ran has absolutely NO LESS of an outcome than a third-place also-ran casted vote!
...the MSM will ensure that the most saturated candidate "vet" in history will occur this Summer and into the Fall...
...(including all about Mormonism's racism, Mormonism's necro-dunking, how Romney was spirit-born on another planet (Kolob) -- technically making him an "alien," how Romney as a temple Mormon is a "god-in-embryo" on his way to full grown-up "godhood" of his own planet, and how his voters are endorsing/elevating idolatry by ramping up a competitor to THE god, etc)...
IOW...what if the Fall polls clearly show Romney below 40%...Obama above 40%...and more importantly, Romney badly losing in states once thought to be key vital "swing states"????
My Q THEN -- back to you would be: Why would any conservative vote for an obvious "cast vote to the wind" cause @ that point?
You've just told me not to "wind-waste" my vote on a runner-up.
So you would swallow your own advice then?
If the polls solidly indicate that Romney won't win -- as of late October -- that Q boomerangs back your way: Why wind-waste your vote on a runner-up? (It's not 'horseracing' ya know...where they pay out for the runner-up)
Other Reasons for certain FREEPERs to vote third-party and not Romney:
No matter how many FREEPERS & how many conservatives vote for Romney in CA, Obama is still going to carry that state! That's a fact!
That state is just too liberal. Orange Co., San Diego Co., the Central Valley (home of JimRob) ain't enough to overcome LA, the Bay Area, liberal NorCal, etc.
A Freeper's vote on the Left Coast (CA, WA, OR) really "won't count" in any of those states! And you can say the same thing for states like NY, NJ, IL, and some of those 16 states that aren't as bad off economically.
See, that's what gets me. We have so many FREEPERs-turned-relativists via this utilitarian political pragmatic ethic of beating Obama. Yet when I turn that same utilitarian political pragmatic ethic back on FR voters who live in liberal states, all of a sudden that ethic doesn't apply. Why?
There is ZERO reason to vote for Romney in a liberal state! Obama will pragmatically win in those states, anyway; ya might as well both...
...save searing of your conscience & setting a precedent of voting for a liberal POTUS...
...+ send a message to the GoP-establishment.
The October polls will also disclose which states Romney would have easily "locked up." Once those states are established, FREEPERs can also be "released" to vote for neither Obama or Romney. Why? Because if we added up ALL of the FREEPERs in those states...and if they 100% voted third-party, guess what? Romney will readily win those states, anyway. [There wouldn't be enough FREEPERs in those states to undercut Romney]
Do you see how this enlarged utilitarian political pragmatic ethic cuts both ways?
The only true FREEPERs who have a "voting dilemma" before them are the true "swing" state voters...and even those states are not simply the ones the MSM has designated now -- but those states that will be "too close to call" polling-wise come late Oct/early Nov.
Every other FREEPER -- per the same utilitarian political pragmatic ethic preached @ us third-party people - has ZERO excuse for voting for a pro-abort, big-govt, socialistic healthcare pioneer.
“At least hes not a Commy.” tee shirt...
~ ~ ~
Thanks! I don’t know how to post a pic. I like
the Obmney tee-shirts.
The masses have shifted THAT far to the left?
In INDIANA, we are working VERY hard to make ABORTION illegal!
We have an EXCELLANT case before the courts that involves a women, killing her 'fetus' by drinking rat poison.
If we can nail her; then the whole INDUSTRY is going down!!
My toater has as much a chance of winning. I understand wanting to vote for a "sinless" man, but such hasn't esxisted for over 2,000 years. Per the Bible, it seems that blaspheme of the Holy Spirit is the one unforgivable sin - the rest look exactly the same in the eyes of the Lord - a sin is a sin is a sin and the penaly for all sins is death. Lacking a sinless man to vote for, I'm more apt to vote for one who might knock Obama out and I cannot discount Obama's "Give me some space until my next elextion is over..." speech. Accident? Or was God letting us know something else? I can't answer that and neither can you. Do what's in your heart and I'll do what's in mine. If it has to be the lesser of two evils, so be it.
I suppose that, Biblically speaking, your plan to allow Obama another term might speed up the inevitable fall into chaos that will occur before He comes back. But I'm also not going to purposely try to move God's Hand - some nutjob in Iran is already trying to do that. Good day/God Bless.
I think you forgot the sarcasm tag.