Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raulgomez05

Well what did anyone expect? Romney knows that birthers won’t vote for him so why should he defend them?


24 posted on 05/27/2012 11:43:38 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eye of Unk

Aside form the legal issue, it’s a very polarizing and divisive issue between the left and right. Romney is simply trying to sway democrat voters onto his side. They’re in play due to losing their houses, being out of work and suffering like the rest of us. To focus on birther issues will infuriate those voters who would otherwise be thinking of coming over to Romney. It’s a reasonable tactic.


42 posted on 05/27/2012 1:31:18 PM PDT by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Eye of Unk

Well what did anyone expect? Romney knows that birthers won’t vote for him so why should he defend them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I’m NOT a birther but I won’t vote for romney; but not for the reasons those birther kooks propagate!


59 posted on 05/28/2012 1:57:29 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson