Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Not true, apparently.

Yep. It wasn't likely - you wouldn't need only a training pipeline full of women but ones who were already qualified and experienced - E3 through E8 and department-head level officers. They're just not there. And you can't run a submarine without them.

Even now, after five decades of coeducational experience in the surface Navy, it'd be tough to run an all-woman ship, at least for very long. The simple act of manning (sorry) a ship from the pool of existing sailors precludes that sort of selectivity - people qualify, are promoted, transfer in and out, leave the Navy for civilian life; it isn't a static problem. Maintaining readiness under that sort of flux is the Navy's primary personnel challenge.

I do see that Nuclear Power School graduated some women last year. That's a start, but it's a very small one. My congratulations to the graduates - that's a really tough course.

87 posted on 05/28/2012 5:42:52 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
I do see that Nuclear Power School graduated some women last year. That's a start, but it's a very small one. My congratulations to the graduates - that's a really tough course.

Because of the politics involved here, count me highly skeptical of this...not that women can't complete NNPS, just that the pressure to produce female graduates has always resulted in lower standards and special treatment for women in every other training process.
96 posted on 05/28/2012 5:52:08 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared.....for what's coming AFTER America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson