Skip to comments.Birth-certificate 'surprise' in October? (Another Forgery Planned)
Posted on 05/30/2012 4:32:17 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
An intelligence source in Hawaii who warned early last year that a forged Obama birth record would be released now says that amid continued doubts about the authenticity of the document posted on the White House website, a forged original birth certificate intended to pass forensic inspection by using 1961 materials is being prepared and could be released as an October surprise.
The source, who has contact with Hawaii government officials, was questioned by Mike Zullo, the head of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaios Cold Case Posse team. Zullo recently returned from a trip to Hawaii to follow up on leads in the posses investigation of Obamas eligibility for the 2012 election ballot in Arizona. Arpaio announced March 1 that his team found probable cause that the document posted by the White House April 27, 2011, is a forgery.
Zullo told WND today that regardless of whether the Hawaii sources information pans out, he wants to see the original microfilm record of Obamas birth.
If they decide to try to produce a document, were going to be skeptical, he said. Weve been calling for the microfilm from the beginning.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
releasing another forgery does not explain away the first...
A sensible person would ask, where was this particular “copy” two years ago?
Sheriff Joe is beginning to remind me of that Internet superstar guy whose announcements used to get posted around here. If you have something important to say, why wait until the “earliest possible date in June”? Why not do it now? And yes, I know that tomorrow is June 1st, but they’ve been saying “the earliest possible date in June” for two weeks now.
...and would also wonder why anyone needs to release 3 different copies. Wonder how they square a third BC with the first two?
I’m not clairvoyant, but I foresee a Romney Birther Movement springing up within the enemy (Obama) Camp.
Until this morning when I sat the article, I didn’t know that Romney’s father was born in Mexico.
Hm... But can they copy the handwriting perfectly from the computer birth-certificate onto the “authentic” birth certificate?
Sounds like they are just going to print out the PDF file on to old paper and use old ink. So they have an actual piece of paper.
Still isn’t going to explain away all the different type faces, and multitude of other problems with it.
What’s interesting is the inside source telegraphing their plans.
I would ask how a 50 year old got through his adult life without having his birth certificate at hand.
But I doubt they would be able to get usable microfiche stock that was around when the records were put on microfiche. That stuff deteriorates. Hence the reason why he wants the microfiche roll.
The same way a New York Times reporter can be an illegal immigrant.
My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant
The question would still remain...were you lying then or are you lying now?
Romney hasn’t forged documents, stolen 5 Trillion dollars and murdered US citizens.
Not only that, but the document would have to contain at least 3 different types of ink - one for the form, one for the typed info, and one for the signatures ( though there would probably be three for those since I doubt Dunham, the doctor, and the registrar used the same pen ). They will have a hard time printing out the copy. They would have to do it in stages - the form first, then the info, then the signatures. It will be hard to get a pixel to pixel placement of what is printed to match what they have already posted.
The same tired counter arguments from CNN employees like "but.. but it was published in a newspaper."
The CNN employee totally ignored Trump's mention that there is no record of Obama's mother being in a hospital at the time and no reaction from the CNN employee when Mr. Trump mentioned that publisher's biographical sketch of Obama.
I was not born in a hospital. The official record in the state contains only the information that my parents provided when they got around to registering my birth weeks later;
.. so YES! the state of Kentucky's records could confirm that a Photoshop-generated imagine of a b.c. contains information present in the state's records; and if my parents had lied about a hospital that would not change the fact the state could still honestly declare that the "Photoshop-generated imagine of a b.c. contains information present in the state's records;"
.. and yes whatever information my parents put on the forms all must be true because my birth announcement was published in a stupid newspaper. Go figure.
I’d love for a reporter to bring a copy of a release for Obama to sign with him to a press conference. Then ask him in front of everyone if he would sign the release for numerous records that he has been hiding. If he refuses then ask him why he won’t do it.
I wonder how much more it ups the ante to actually print and notarize a piece of paper.
Digital images aren’t documents.
I guess they want to cement their fraud in physical paper form.
Why does the Obama administration care if no one else does?
Or is this the Hawaiian government trying to cover up crap with more crap, hoping that we won't notice the crap.
What does Obama have to hide?
Plenty! Stop and think: Why would anyone want to hide their birth certificate? Answer: Because they have something to hide.
Plain common sense, nothing more.
Novermber 2012 will come and go and you will not see an original birth certificate because there is none. Remember what his grandmother said that she was there in Kenya and witnessed it. The only original birth certificate says Kenya on it. If he had an original which said Hawaii on it, you would have seen it by now. The Democratic party did not spend over a million dollars so Obama could be a wise acre.