Skip to comments.Planned Parenthood targets Romney with new swing-state ad buy blitz (and so it begins)
Posted on 05/30/2012 10:40:07 AM PDT by LUV W
Planned Parenthood, endorsing President Obama Wednesday morning, went after Mitt Romney out of the gate with a new ad buy in crucial swing states accusing the Republican candidate of undermining women's rights.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/30/planned-parenthood-targets-romney-with-new-swing-state-ad-buy/#ixzz1wNMGXP3G
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Could Holder end up being a Supreme, highly unlikely.
ugh.. i may be wrong about the ability of congress to cut funding to portions of government without presidential approval...
however... they can, at the very least obstruct his socialist agenda. which is far more than would happen if the socialist happened to be a republican.
Can't veto what isn't there.
Willie Mitty didnt pay his Planned Parenthood Club membership dues this year...
Planned Infanticide is a more accurate title, IMO.
The most pro-abortion guy the GOP ever nominated “undermines” abortion “rights”??
accusing the Republican candidate of undermining women’s rights.
and thats right...
Willard who is pro-abortion is responsible for discrimination against unborn women abd their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...
plus he never has been too supportive of other rights for women...in employment, etc
..we get it..
.you don't give a rip about our country and its future and boy, are you going to stomp your foot and have a temper tantrum...
just go ahead....
it takes 33% to make change like we need and then there's the 33% who sit on the sidelines and complain but don't do a damn "f'king" thing about and its people like that who'll keep bamey in power...
its sickening and its disgusting....I just hope you'll have the b*alls to refrain from complaining when you immaculate that dang bastard again...
I need to calm down before I send them anything. Otherwise dips*** dyke might come and track me down.
I will vote Romney because he is the lesser of 2 evils. I know everybody is tired of voting and holding nose, but I will do one more time, will not condemn those who do not, just offering my opinion.
I know Romney is probably everything you say he is, however if he should do the right things for the wrong reason, matters not to the children what his motives may or may not be.
At the very least, we have the ability to pressure him in to appointing Conservative Supreme Court judges, yes I understand he has done opposite in Mass, but here`s hoping/praying.
This is the last chance for a Conservative Supreme Court judge or 2, so waiting for next cycle is to late.
Also where are we going to find Americans to vote for a decent Conservative? Where are all these decent Americans? How many so called decent Americans voted for Obama.
The unborn child does not care if Romney does the right thing for the wrong reason, so my vote goes for Anybody but Obama, this case it`s Romney. We have great Conservatives that can pressure Romney to appoint Conservatives to the Court.
I vote straight Republican
Wait, how can this be? All the liberals are my friends!
Yawn, yet another lame attack on Romney.
So now we know:
1. He doesn’t eat dogs
2. His father wasn’t a polygamist
3. He doesn’t get the baby-killers endorsement.
Obumble, on the other hand.....
/Applause/ Mega-Dittoes and thank you for saying it. PrObama FReepers will take their ball and go home while the adults do the heavy lifting.
......Yeah, but Romney donated to them before, so they’ll go lightly on him. Just wait until the Press starts asking Romney why Joe Smith called Christianity “an abomination”. Ouch. Good luck with that!
“Can you say Backfire?”
My thoughts exactly. I’ll vote for Romney, but only to defeat Obama.
One of my reservations about Romney was that he has not been consistently and strongly pro-life.
Now watch Planned (UN)Parenthood try to prove me wrong. And this is coming out just as Americans are becoming more pro-life. http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-Americans-Record-Low.aspx?version=print
While I have to agree with you that a president somehow “vetoing” a spending cut would be impossible constitutionally; when I look at Obama’s history, I would not put it past him.
Taking over industries and demanding private owned stocks be given to union members without compensation? Never heard of but done by Obama.
Recess appointments when the Senate is still in session? Unconstitutional but Obama did it and nobody has done anything to stop him.
Illegally running guns to gangs and drug dealers in a foreign country, causing the death of thousands of foreigners and at least two Americans. Unheard of but committed under Obama without a finger lifted to even admonish him.
I put nothing past Obama as he feels the constitution and the rule of law is beneath him. Furthermore, our elected representatives have proven themselves to be spineless when it comes to standing up against our tyrant in chief.
I can see Obama figuring out a way to “veto” spending cuts and doing it with the House and Senate sitting on their thumbs allowing him to destroy yet another part of our constitution.
“Planned Parenthood Action Fund Ad Does Not Violate Tax Laws As Fox Suggested”
Seems these anti-Romney advertisements were put out by a separate entity separate organization called Planned Parenthood Action Fund Ad. I doubt this fund gets any tax dollars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.