Skip to comments.Enemy Inside The Gate
Posted on 05/30/2012 6:38:08 PM PDT by Lazamataz
It can be argued, by mere observation, that Barack Obama has little fealty to America, and more fealty to certain concepts and ideologies. Those ideologies are Black Liberation Theology, of which he was a student in Chicagos Trinity United Church of Christ for many decades; of global governance; and of socialism... perhaps even Marxism.
The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. One may readily discard a politicians words, and instead look to their works. The words are intended to mislead, and the works are intended to achieve.
Obama's actions that show his loyalty to a very controversial view, that of Black Liberation Theology, are many. Black Liberation Theology is based on an underlying assumption few of us would disagree with -- that Jesus held out for the oppressed and that in American history, blacks were oppressed. No one would deny these two theses. Where Black Liberation Theology diverges from mainstream, even rational, thought is that it also holds that there is such a thing as a 'white church', that it is a work of the Antichrist, and that all American institutions are, by definition and presently, racist.
Barack Obama's primary actions that show he embraces these doctrines are in his appointment and ongoing support of Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the United States. Mr. Holder has steadfastly refused to prosecute the New Black Panthers for issuing death threats and bounties against George Zimmerman, and refused to prosecute members of the same organization who expressly brandished weapons in an effort to deter white voters from entering a voting place in Philadelphia. Recently, he has condemned Voter ID -- measures intended to stop voter fraud -- as an attack on the 'sacred right to vote'. These are several of the more visible actions. How many hundreds of similar actions (based on a dismissive attitude towards prosecution of only one segment of the population) are there, that the public does not hear about? We also have the outright admission of Mr. Holder that he is expressly allied with the New Black Panther party, when he famously said that the mere existence of the case demeans 'my people'.
Obama's own speech shows that he is an advocate for global governance. When abroad on November the 9th, 2010, he stated that "There is going to be a tug-of-war within the US between those who see globalization as a threat and those who accept we live in a open integrated world, which has challenges and opportunities." This particular allegiance can safely be marked as 'confirmed' by his own words. His actions mirror his words, as well: He pushed for the Law of the Sea Treaty, which empowers the UN to tax all nations, including ours, by seizing royalties nations collect for use of international waters near their borders. This is but one egregious example, there are many more.
Certainly no one can seriously argue, at this juncture, that Obama is not predisposed to socialism. He famously stated, in the Joe the Plumber incident, that he "[thinks] when you spread the wealth around, its good for everybody." Most people would define that as a form of socialism, in which wealth is distributed and 'leveled' from those who create it, to those that do not. Then, of course, we have the infamous 'Obamacare' measure, in which people would be forced to participate in an insurance program that the Administration and it's allies have admitted, would be best run as a single-payer (read: government) program. In other countries, they readily admit that this is Socialized Medicine. Here, in America, the pundits are not so forthcoming.
So, we have seen that Obama has loyalty to a lot of ideologies that America and her citizens have long opposed. When a man is behoven to ideologies over a nation, and over the will of the citizens and contrary to their benefit, he cannot be said to be loyal to that nation.
For nations can endure many setbacks and deprivations, but when it is lead by a man disloyal to that nations interest, when he prefers certain ideologies to national loyalty, and when he cedes sovereignty to a global interest, how is a nation to survive that? When the halls of the nations capitols ring with arguments meant to aid external and foreign entities at the cost of a nation, that nation cannot long survive, An enemy army outside the gate is much less fearsome than an enemy ruler, directing our own destruction, inside the gate.
It seems we have such a leader.
Buckwheat was a talented actor of the silver screen, and you, sir, impugn his good name with that odious comparison to the Kenyan imposter.
He has injected himself into affairs where no serious President has before: "If I had a son, he'd look like..." "The police acted stupidly"...."You could build a coal fired electrical generator, but you'll go bankrupt"....
I can't stand listening to him anymore. And the same goes for those who spout the same nonsense. Chris Matthews used to be interesting but has now turned into a creature from the communist lagoon. These people have a real hate-on for conservatives and limited government. Why? They don't think anymore but just 'feel'. And they're feeling a lot of HATE.
What this group of thugs is doing to America is like the guy biting the face off the homeless guy who was just minding his own business. The EPA going after (crucify) wealthy conservative businesses-"Chomp!" Eric Holder's justice going after conservative gun owners with Fast and Furious- "Chomp!" Non-recess appointments (4?)- "Chomp!"
November doesn't get here fast enough. In fact, some might say that the backsliding that has occurred under this President will have repercussions that no new President will be able to correct without a serious depression being inevitable. He has spent our seed-stock, he as championed death over life in preventing either births or ending pregnancies.
I'll leave it to the reader to conclude how a sane society would normally deal with such a person. Think golf. Think nine iron. Think Mrs. Tiger Woods.
Your comments to this article are some of the best I’ve read. They would have made fine additions, and fit right in, to my article. You ought consider trying your hand at editorial writing, on this forum.....
That's a self ping and bookmark.
Thanks for the ping(s).... LUB
Excellent points. Nine iron, indeed. Leg irons would be good as well.
Thanks, kevcol. Send this article around your normal internet circle.....thanks!
How come everyone has a cool screen name but me?
That’s pretty scary and validates some of our suspicions.
Times are a changin’ . . . at a faster and faster pace.
I believe that your fears are well founded, My FRiend.
Good work. There may be hope yet. In the last three weeks I have had conversations with individuals I come in contact with at stores I patronize, all have said,” I am praying about this election.” I say, “What do you meanby that?” Their response,”I am praying that we can vote obama out of office.” We will know for sure the first Wednesday in November.
Obama is the most successful communist traitor mole in history, bar none.
Compared to Obama, Philby and Walker were toddler spies.
Well, that’s good — but it may be a function of the circles you travel in. As the staff of the New York Times lamented, “How did Reagan get elected? Nobody I know voted for him!”
Kudos for and excellent assessment of our current situation.
And thank you for the hilarious mixed metaphor mayhem you started. You made me LOL!