Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists invent 'cannabis without the high'
Jewish World Review ^ | 5/31/2012 | AFP Writer

Posted on 05/31/2012 5:51:32 AM PDT by Former Fetus

Israeli scientists have cultivated a cannabis plant that doesn't get people stoned in a development that may help those smoking marijuana for medical purposes, a newspaper said on Wednesday.

According to the Maariv daily, the new cannabis looks, smells and even tastes the same, but does not induce any of the feelings normally associated with smoking marijuana that are brought on by the substance THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol.

"It has the same scent, shape and taste as the original plant -- it's all the same -- but the numbing sensation that users are accustomed to has disappeared," said Tzahi Klein, head of development at Tikkun Olam, the firm that developed the species.

(Excerpt) Read more at 1.rp-api.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannabis; hemp; marijuana; medicaluse; nothc; pollination; pollution; whatsthepoint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Former Fetus
Cantabis?
21 posted on 05/31/2012 6:26:00 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Can’t think of a dumber invention.


22 posted on 05/31/2012 6:29:18 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Will help me stay asleep all night?


23 posted on 05/31/2012 6:30:12 AM PDT by Lizavetta (You get what you tolerate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Z

True but unfortunately they are about 0.1% of the people pushing Medical Marijuana. Most I have seen are potheads talking about using Medical Marijuana to control their stress and anxiety. This leads to my conclusion that Medical Marijuana is more about the marijuana than the medical for many of its supporters.


24 posted on 05/31/2012 6:30:16 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: relictele

In Smith’s Wealth of Nations, hemp is listed as the number one import from the American colonies at the time of the writing. I’m relatively sure it was not for recreational purposes.


25 posted on 05/31/2012 6:31:29 AM PDT by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!just a minute........have to catch my breath........hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!......this is rich........hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!......now they’ll be yammering for medical meth.........”I have to pay for marijuana that doesn’t give me a rush? I’m cured!”


26 posted on 05/31/2012 6:38:32 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

This innovation will certainly help identify the fraudsters.


27 posted on 05/31/2012 6:40:37 AM PDT by Third Person ( Actions reflect priorities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

This obsession with finding something, anything to get around giving people a medication that might make ‘em feel good as a side effect is thoroughly bizarre.

In the early 20th century and before you could buy pure morphine sulphate by the oz, not to mention a wide variety of other potential intoxicants.

In what much come as a shock to some of you, the western world still managed to give birth to the industrial revolution and numberless other leaps forward during this period rather than descending into a antinomian, hedonistic abyss.

Someone once defined fundamentalism as the nagging suspicion that someone, somewhere, might be having a good time. Ridiculous “discoveries” like this and the people who cheer them on (very often with a sneer on their faces) are proof positive that whoever said that had a point.


28 posted on 05/31/2012 6:48:08 AM PDT by gzzimlich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

There’s already cannabis that won’t get you high. It’s called hemp.


29 posted on 05/31/2012 6:50:03 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

****This innovation will certainly help identify the fraudsters****

And probably create a whole slew of new ones. Ya better trust your dealer or who knows what you’ll get.


30 posted on 05/31/2012 6:51:46 AM PDT by ResponseAbility (Islam...Imperialism in a turban.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BillGunn

Perhaps. But when your foremost spokesman is Woody Harrelson, it’s a safe bet that he’s not really interested in the industrial uses of the product. It is - pardon the pun - a smokescreen.


31 posted on 05/31/2012 6:52:25 AM PDT by relictele (We are officially OUT of other people's money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Doesn’t work that way. Hemp in the area is the worst thing that can happen to a marijuana grower, because it cross pollinates with marijuana to make the marijuana much weaker. This is why much marijuana is grown inside.

The first thing a marijuana grower does is to cull all the male plants, because female plants will continue to excrete the resin with its “active ingredients” only until pollinated. So delaying pollination = stronger marijuana.

And both male marijuana and hemp put out a huge amount of pollen contamination. Some years ago, a health food store chain in Tucson set up pollen monitoring stations and provided the data to the local media. By far, throughout the entire year, marijuana pollen was the number one allergen. Finally the city asked them to stop reporting that particular pollen, as it made them look bad.

And this is in an area where there is zero native hemp, so this was just marijuana pollen. Were hemp to be commercially grown there, marijuana would almost have to be grown in an overpressure clean room to escape pollen contamination.


32 posted on 05/31/2012 7:02:31 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

"Like dude..why?"
33 posted on 05/31/2012 7:15:57 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
I am for legalization of marijuana but from a stand point of personal liberty.

In theory, you are right; the problem is that in practice our personal liberty will be infringed by more of our money being taken to support the stoners when they become unemployable. It will be declared a disease, as they have done with alcoholism, and they'll get to mooch off of us for life!

Personal liberty must be accompanied by personal responsibility.

34 posted on 05/31/2012 7:23:14 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

What a waste. Gimme the güt schït.


35 posted on 05/31/2012 7:41:02 AM PDT by lefty-lie-spy (Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

No doubt this will soon be a top seller at the medi-juana shops in cali.
riiiiight


36 posted on 05/31/2012 7:58:15 AM PDT by hewhowaits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

[ Next thing you know they’ll invent sugar that’s not sweet........... ]

They already have it and the government sub sidizes it, it is called corn syrup....

High fructose or otherwise it is crap compared to beet sugar.


37 posted on 05/31/2012 7:58:38 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

[ I am for legalization of marijuana but from a stand point of personal liberty.
In theory, you are right; the problem is that in practice our personal liberty will be infringed by more of our money being taken to support the stoners when they become unemployable. It will be declared a disease, as they have done with alcoholism, and they’ll get to mooch off of us for life!

Personal liberty must be accompanied by personal responsibility. ]

I am for legalization of (some) drugs if it occurs along side the criminalization of state welfare programs.


38 posted on 05/31/2012 7:59:57 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

What’s the point of it?


39 posted on 05/31/2012 8:01:01 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live athrough it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gzzimlich

There’s a very good reason for that. There has long been a strong, if somewhat convoluted, moralist (as opposed to “moral”) rationale for this. Simply put, they abhor the idea of pleasure without concomitant pain. It goes all the way back to the deviants who practiced “mortification of the flesh”.

It crops up again and again in the western world, and figures mightily in the zeitgeist of “control freaks” like Mayor Bloomberg, banner of Slurpees.

I actually proved this theory with the help of a friend who vanity published an “everything you ever wanted to know about abused drugs” book.

As a ha-ha, we decided to design a (fake) drug which would be “perfectly immoral”, as well as “perfectly harmless”. Maximum naughty pleasure with zero bad side effects or consequences. We imagined it, then he put it in a later edition of his book.

In effect, it was “super Viagra plus”, before Viagra was invented. But more so. It would cause a gentle euphoria, followed by intense sexual stimulation and loss of all moral constraints. It would also radically increase sexual endurance.

In short, it would turn a person, male or female, into a “horn dog” for up to four days, without fatigue, exhaustion or loss of libido. They would copulate with anyone or anything. Then after a solid day of sleep, they would wake up happy and fit as a fiddle. With the loss of some fat burned up with all that exercise, and far better muscle tone.

By this definition, to the anti-pleasure moralists, it was close to the ultimate evil.

As spice, we added that the one side effect was an intense and very focused paranoia involving talking about the drug. After using it, users would discontinue the use of other drugs, like heroin, alcohol and tobacco, so they could afford more of it, though it was very rare and hard to obtain. They would not, however, talk about it to anyone outside of their circle of users.

Users would use a crudely drawn graffiti anarchist letter “A” in a circle to communicate with each other. (This has long been a common graffiti.)

About a month after he put out the new edition, a friend noticed a police officer taking photographs of just graffiti letter “A’s”.

We thought this was hilarious until a whole herd of evil looking “biker zombies from Hell” undercover police showed up, waving thick wads of cash to anyone and everyone who could get them some of this drug. They scared the heck out of everyone in the area.

While confirming our theory, we also ended the experiment right there. The author was so frightened that he left the city and lived in an isolated rural trailer for a month.


40 posted on 05/31/2012 8:03:33 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson