Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warming gas levels hit 'troubling milestone'
Yahoo ^ | 5/31/12 | Seth Borenstein - AP

Posted on 05/31/2012 8:27:32 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (AP) — The world's air has reached what scientists call a troubling new milestone for carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.

Monitoring stations across the Arctic this spring are measuring more than 400 parts per million of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere. The number isn't quite a surprise, because it's been rising at an accelerating pace. Years ago, it passed the 350 ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395.

So far, only the Arctic has reached that 400 level, but the rest of the world will follow soon.

"The fact that it's 400 is significant," said Jim Butler, global monitoring director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Lab in Boulder, Colo. "It's just a reminder to everybody that we haven't fixed this and we're still in trouble."

Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas and most of it lasts about 100 years in the air, but some of it stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years. Some carbon dioxide is natural, mainly from decomposing dead plants and animals. Before the Industrial Age, levels were around 275 parts per million.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: climatechange; gaslevels; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; milestone; noaa; troubling; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last
I'm on a We'Re DooMeD! roll tonite.

and I still need to post a Nascar race thread. talk about a disaster in the making. ;-]

1 posted on 05/31/2012 8:27:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Last I heard the “tippping point” was going to come in 2008. Since its too late now anyhow maybe these chicken littles will please just shut up an go away.


2 posted on 05/31/2012 8:29:50 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Warming gas levels hit 'troubling milestone'

We are all gona' die!!!

3 posted on 05/31/2012 8:31:39 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; NormsRevenge

What’s changed since 2008?

Obama took office, that’s what. We shall all blame Obama, it happened under his watch.


4 posted on 05/31/2012 8:32:05 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Years ago, it passed the 350 ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395.

Air bubbles in Cretaceous amber show that CO2 levels then were around 3,200 ppm.

5 posted on 05/31/2012 8:33:23 PM PDT by Spirochete (Sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Hey, pal......I’ve got your CO2 home removal kit right here. Don’t crowd...plenty to go around.


6 posted on 05/31/2012 8:34:27 PM PDT by Huskrrrr ( the will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Is something carrying CO2 to the arctic, but not to the antarctic? Or failing to absorb it in one locale but not the other? Le Chatelier’s [sp?] principle would suggest that, like chilling a fizzy Coke, you’d absorb more carbon dioxide in the water in the arctic (so long as there was open liquid water available to do so). So there should be less of the stuff in the arctic, not more.


7 posted on 05/31/2012 8:34:35 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

” - - - carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.”

WRONG!

There is no known cause and effect between a change in the CO2 content in the atmosphere and a change in the temperature of the atmosphere.


8 posted on 05/31/2012 8:36:03 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Yup. “Gaia” has survived far greater atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, and she has come back from it smelling like a rose. The hard question is how can you manage to kill the earth, not how can you keep from killing it.


9 posted on 05/31/2012 8:36:17 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.

LOL! Who wrote this, an eighth grader?

10 posted on 05/31/2012 8:37:08 PM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

IOW.....we’re perpetuating the concocted MYTH....so those RICH countries will forgive those POOR countries their debt and shift $$$$ to them through a ‘Robin Hood Tax’ (i.e. ‘Carbon Exchange’).


11 posted on 05/31/2012 8:38:44 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Even more to the point CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas. All the models require that CO2 merely act as a trigger to up H20 levels which is what actually causes the real temperature change. You can double atmospheric CO2 and get only a 1 C increase in temperature.


12 posted on 05/31/2012 8:38:58 PM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

The best theoretical (not hyperventilated empirical) principles suggest a weak heat trapping effect from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide that is logarithmic. To double the effect requires far more than twice the amount of carbon dioxide. And other entities such as methane and plain old water vapor vastly dominate the heat trapping effects of the atmosphere.

There is a theoretical cause and effect, but it’s so small that it would get lost in the chaotic noise of normal natural processes.


13 posted on 05/31/2012 8:40:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Water and water vapor has a far larger effect on global temperatures than CO2.

But they never let facts get in the way.

/johnny

14 posted on 05/31/2012 8:40:40 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I believe I read or heard a few days ago that a construction project of some kind on Alaska’s north slope had to be postponed due to uncommonly thick ice.

????????????????


15 posted on 05/31/2012 8:42:37 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

But again, as more water vapor gets into the air, there are more clouds, whose tops reflect sunlight away from the planet! So it’s by no means a simplistic issue. Science as we know it has too little data to make anything but SWAGs (slyentific wild arse guesses).


16 posted on 05/31/2012 8:43:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
measuring more than 400 parts per million

Do these idiots not realize how close .04% is to zero?

As an agent necessary to plant growth, it's an alarmingly low level, especially when compared to 78% for Nitrogen

17 posted on 05/31/2012 8:43:24 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

F-in Yahoo is aptly named. They are also heavily invested in the global warming scam or just plain stupid enviro idiots who just jumped off a Whale War boat.


18 posted on 05/31/2012 8:44:25 PM PDT by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"The fact that it's 400 is significant," said Jim Butler, global monitoring director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Lab in Boulder, Colo.

No, it isn't. It is just a number from an arbitrary numbering system, measuring in arbitrary units. The number has no natural, intrinsic significance whatsoever. However, it does help "sell" the AGW agenda to make it sound "significant."

Some carbon dioxide is natural...

Well, I guess that depends on your definition of "some." To me, I might go with "an overwhelming majority of" instead. You see, as I understand it, 97% of the Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere comes from natural sources. Yes, 97%, not a typo. We contribute just under 3%... 97%, yeah, that's "some" from natural sources...

19 posted on 05/31/2012 8:44:53 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It’s all those factories, cars, and CO2 exhaling humans in the ARCTIC causing the levels to rise there. Must be, because that is what they say is the cause of all this, humans.


20 posted on 05/31/2012 8:44:58 PM PDT by irishtenor (Everything in moderation, however, too much whiskey is just enough... Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"The fact that it's 400 is significant"

"Well, yeah. It's even higher than eleven!"

21 posted on 05/31/2012 8:46:34 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Obama must have been giving another speech. Someone shut this man up or the planet will die! LOL.


22 posted on 05/31/2012 8:46:58 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I wish I could make up complete BS and get paid handsomely.


23 posted on 05/31/2012 8:47:23 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas

Errr....that would be water vapor.

24 posted on 05/31/2012 8:48:02 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

...I thought all the ice at the arctic was supposed to be gone by now....


25 posted on 05/31/2012 8:50:10 PM PDT by Tzimisce (THIS SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"...carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant."

CO2 is NOT a pollutant and is essential for all life on earth. That minute amounts of CO2 can alter the global climate is pure BS. In Australia a group of scientists have formed the Galileo Movement to oppose the Labour governments CO2 tax. This Galileo Movement video puts the whole CO2 as pollutant argument to rest. Grain of Rice Video

26 posted on 05/31/2012 8:50:24 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
395 parts per million is a drop in the bucket.

All that number means is that there are 999,605 parts per million of other gases.

27 posted on 05/31/2012 8:50:31 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

There is a depiction of WATER VAPOR on most WEATHER SATELLITE websites.

There NEVER is a CO2 depiction. Wonder why?


28 posted on 05/31/2012 8:50:43 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

RIGHT!

CO2 = < 400ppM = < 0.04 % of atmosphere
H2O = 25,000 ppM = 2.5 % of atmosphere

BTW, note that the CO2 levels did not statistically correlate with the atmosphere temperatures in the 1940’s.


29 posted on 05/31/2012 8:51:23 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

“carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.”

LOL! Who wrote this, an eighth grader?


I apologize for the lack of html, HB (my kids and husband use a French keyboard and I can only do html properly at home), but isn’t methane one of the biggest pollutants? As in, um, cow emissions?


30 posted on 05/31/2012 8:51:49 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher; All

at home = should be “at work.”


31 posted on 05/31/2012 8:53:00 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Calm Down ! Calm Down ! God made it we can’t break it !


32 posted on 05/31/2012 8:57:26 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (Any man may make a mistake ; none but a fool will persist in it . { Latin proverb })
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Absolutely. The theories they proffer have nothing to back them up and fly in the face of historical data. I mean if that 1 C change from CO2 could get us to a tipping point, why have we not hit it already and gone into a catastrophic warming death spiral? I mean the annual temperature variations year to year can be appreciably greater than 1 degree.

The theories are complete bunk, and only a self deluded computer modeller or someone who’s funding 100% relies upon panicking people would sell such crap.


33 posted on 05/31/2012 9:01:53 PM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE! (sometime)


34 posted on 05/31/2012 9:04:07 PM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Photobucket
35 posted on 05/31/2012 9:04:07 PM PDT by mykroar (October race riots bring November martial law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

bookmark to show the kids


36 posted on 05/31/2012 9:05:07 PM PDT by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
"carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant."

LOL! Who wrote this, an eighth grader?

Have you seen photos of some of these liberal 'journalists'? Most of them look like they just stepped in from skateboarding at the local mall.

I'm not kidding. Most of what we read in the liberal press is being pounded out by people whose very first presidential vote was for John Kerry.

37 posted on 05/31/2012 9:05:22 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Dang it! I just bought some green bananas!


38 posted on 05/31/2012 9:09:07 PM PDT by OSHA (One despises and wants to destroy the United States, the other is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And the last Ice Age was 2000+ PPM....

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/ice-age-at-2000-ppm-co2/


39 posted on 05/31/2012 9:10:09 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

Careful now - they don’t take kindly to you mathy types throwing facts around like that.


40 posted on 05/31/2012 9:10:55 PM PDT by mykroar (October race riots bring November martial law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

” - - - - There is a theoretical cause and effect, but it’s so small that it would get lost in the chaotic noise of normal natural processes.”

First there is an idea, then a speculation, then an hypothesis and finally after exhaustive testing the idea becomes a theory. Rarely is anything tested enough to become a Law.

If it does become a Law, then someone finds exceptions to it and the process starts all over. The two Laws of Gravity is a recent example: Newton’s and Einstein’s.

Since Global Warming is still in the statistical inference stage, Global Warming is an idea that is struggling to become a speculation.

Testing the idea of Global Warming is maintained at the impossible level by “experts”increasing the number of factors to be independently tested. Last year there were over 200 such variables - - - .

ALL TOGETHER NOW: “GLOBAL WARMING IS JUNK SCIENCE!”

BTW, since CHON is found in all life, and the main source of C is from CO2, is it not true that CO2 is an Environmentally Essential and Friendly Gas?


41 posted on 05/31/2012 9:13:04 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Ping.


42 posted on 05/31/2012 9:16:08 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

More ecowacko BS, even if they are Govt employees.

I love the stupidity in the line about plants will absorb some CO2 in the summer which might lower the recorded level to below 400 ppwhatever.

I guess the plants that started to grow in my garden in February/March, April, and May didn’t absorb any CO2 during that time. I wonder how they grew without it.

Also, if there is increased plant growth due to global warming, then they are available to reduce any increase in CO2 levels.

I’ve always wondered why these so-called scientists are above my pay grade when they are so wrong so often. If I did that in my job, I would have been fired 20 years ago (and I wouldn’t have saved the taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars in liability costs).

Go figure! Up is down; down is up. God knows everything; Obama is God. Issue settled.

George Orwell just crapped in his grave.


43 posted on 05/31/2012 9:23:47 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
Hey, pal......I’ve got your CO2 home removal kit right here. Don’t crowd...plenty to go around.


44 posted on 05/31/2012 9:30:45 PM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

45 posted on 05/31/2012 10:34:46 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Actually, there is a correlation. Rising temps have been shown by ice core data to be followed by a rise in CO2 concentration. In other words, CO2 rises always lag behind rises in temperature, by a fairly noticeable margin.


46 posted on 05/31/2012 11:06:53 PM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Both “Warmists” and “Skeptics” agree on one key issue.....

Doubling CO2 from the “safe” 350 to the “dangerous” 700 will cause the atmosphere to heat up about 1 degree C.

The disagreement concerns “Forcings,” or secondary events.

“Warmists” claim that 700ppm will set off a chain reaction of other events (like drought) that will ADD at least 3.0 degrees C more.

“Skeptics” claim that 700ppm will set off a chain reaction of other events (like clouds) that will REDUCE warming by at least 0.2 degrees C.

47 posted on 05/31/2012 11:30:01 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Years ago, it passed the 350 ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395.

Wow.
I wonder how they decided that?
Does that mean we're dead? No? So they made a mistake. The real number is now 400 ppm. Never mind why. You're not qualified to understand complex computer modeling and integrating the vertical lapse rate of the framistan reciprocal of the alternating rapid global freezing and global warming.
These joker will need a few more gazillion$ to look further into it to find out how much time we really have left. But it's unlikely to be very long.

48 posted on 05/31/2012 11:43:52 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
SETH BORENSTEIN: “Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas and most of it lasts about 100 years in the air, but some of it stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years.”

Cigar smoke is the chief emission of burning cigars. Some stays in the air for fortnight but some remains in the atmosphere for a millenum.

49 posted on 05/31/2012 11:45:11 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas and most of it lasts about 100 years in the air, but some of it stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years.

BZZZZZZZT! WRONG! Water is. Thanks for playing.

Some carbon dioxide is natural, mainly from decomposing dead plants and animals. Before the Industrial Age, levels were around 275 parts per million.

I wonder what the levels were before fermentation? By the way, just how much CO2 does the fermentation process to manufacture Ethanol produce??

Could 'renewable fuels' be a culprit?

Are these guys having a cold one while they are measuring?

50 posted on 06/01/2012 12:52:36 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson