Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: "I don't care if Romney's "not conservative enough."
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | May 30, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/01/2012 9:36:55 AM PDT by Mozilla

He didn't have to say it but he did. Rolled over for the establishment.:

"So Romney has responded (paraphrased), "Oh, yeah? Well, I've got an 80% success rate, Mr. President. The companies that Bain Capital -- using its own money, by the way -- went in and rescued had an 80% success rate. What's your success rate, Mr. President? Zero! Every company you've attempted to save or industry you've tried to give a boost to -- with taxpayer dollars, not even your own -- are bankrupt." And to personify this, to illustrate it, Romney goes to Solyndra today.

Bravo! Well done! I like this.

I don't care if Romney's "not conservative enough." I know some people, like Joe Scarborough yesterday on his show, said (paraphrased), "People don't know about Solyndra! This is crazy. Romney's wasting his time talking about Solyndra. The American people never heard of it and the American people don't care about Solyndra." He said you and I care about it, but nobody else knows about it. I'm sure in certain circles, inside the Beltway, it is considered an inside baseball story that the average American doesn't know about and doesn't care about.

But, see, that's what a campaign is for."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: romney; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last
I get what he is trying to say in the larger context. But he didn't have to say he didn't care how conservative Romney is. Uncalled for.

I’m just saying that Rush, like others, is doubling down on Romney and forced into a situation of carrying his water. They all FAILED and some didn’t even try to get a tea party type to the finish line. They paid lip service to being behind Bachmann, Santorum, Cain and so on. But couldn’t come to defend, actively support or promote any person. So they got what they got. The Era of McCain Must not be over because we have McCain light now.

1 posted on 06/01/2012 9:37:06 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Romney has pledged to repeal Obama Care immediately.

This makes my mind up

2 posted on 06/01/2012 9:41:37 AM PDT by Baynative (REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

McCain light??? Pull your head out of the sand. Romney, like him or not, has already attacked Obama more than McCain.

By this time in 2007, McCain would have thrown Trump under 10 buses.

Get real.


3 posted on 06/01/2012 9:42:05 AM PDT by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I don’t like Mittens either but like it or not, he is what we have to run with. Only Stalin, Hitler and Mugabe could be worse than Obama and two of them are dead so lets beat Obama.


4 posted on 06/01/2012 9:42:27 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I understand the frustration. My first, second, third choice would not have been Romney. However, I can’t but help to realize one certain thing - there is a difference between pure socialist tyrannical evil and misguided/misapplied/mischaracterized mediocrity.

One implies, perhaps, that salvation could be had through constant never-ending pressure by real Americans, IOW bitch slapping him into reality.

The other is a given. There is no salvation, there is no worthwhile change, and there is no doubt that catastrophe will follow.

I’ve made my mind up and it won’t be Obama.


5 posted on 06/01/2012 9:44:20 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

Another point to consider, even if the McCain light were 100% accurate.

Who in their right mind would not rather have McCain as President right now?

The choice in 2008 was not Ronald Reagan or obama. It was McCain or obama. I voted for McCain (in the general...not in the primary obviously).

I wish McCain had won.


6 posted on 06/01/2012 9:45:21 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

Another point to consider, even if the McCain light were 100% accurate.

Who in their right mind would not rather have McCain as President right now?

The choice in 2008 was not Ronald Reagan or obama. It was McCain or obama. I voted for McCain (in the general...not in the primary obviously).

I wish McCain had won.


7 posted on 06/01/2012 9:45:25 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

Another point to consider, even if the McCain light were 100% accurate.

Who in their right mind would not rather have McCain as President right now?

The choice in 2008 was not Ronald Reagan or obama. It was McCain or obama. I voted for McCain (in the general...not in the primary obviously).

I wish McCain had won.


8 posted on 06/01/2012 9:45:25 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Romney has pledged to repeal Obama Care immediately.

Yeah, but keep in mind that keeping ObamaCare around is only a shake of the etch-a-sketch away.

9 posted on 06/01/2012 9:46:30 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (not voting for the lesser of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Scorn and defiance; slight regard, contempt,
And any thing that may not misbecome
The mighty sender, doth he prize you at.
Thus says my king - FR


10 posted on 06/01/2012 9:48:44 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

“McCain light??? Pull your head out of the sand. Romney, like him or not, has already attacked Obama more than McCain.”

Even I can admit that Romney has actually been the most aggressive GOP candidate so far since Bush 88.

You simply cannot compare him to McCain in that way.


11 posted on 06/01/2012 9:51:19 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

'We sure screwed those conservatives didn't we?'

McCain tells voters: We have nothing to fear with Barack Obama in the White House (2008 FLASHBACK)

12 posted on 06/01/2012 9:52:28 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
I wish McCain had won.

I voted for McCain in November 2008 and I wish he had won.

I will campaign for Romney and vote for him this November. I hope he wins.

Because of the current political and economic situation, I am having an easier time accepting Romney this year than I had accepting McCain in 2008.

If I had my choice between either Romney or McCain being sworn in next January, I would take Romney.

13 posted on 06/01/2012 9:53:25 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

You know it is funny, cannot understand why Romney was an acceptable alternative to McCain in 2008, but not an acceptable alternative to 0bama now.


14 posted on 06/01/2012 9:53:59 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

The “etch-a-sketch” dig has always been flimsy at best. I’m sure what Romney’s aid meant was that once the nomination was secured, Romney would change course from attacking his Republican Primary opponents to attacking Obama. At least that’s how I saw it.


15 posted on 06/01/2012 9:55:13 AM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Rush is right.


16 posted on 06/01/2012 9:55:43 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
The “etch-a-sketch” dig has always been flimsy at best.

Any tool at hand is fine for the fanatic.

17 posted on 06/01/2012 9:57:36 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Mark Levin, who says he is supporting Romney, did endorse Bachmann and Santorum, in fact had both on them on his show numerous times, but neither candidate made the effort to get on the ballot in Virgina. You really cannot blame the “establishment” for that. Cain simply self-destructed.
18 posted on 06/01/2012 9:59:28 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Term limit Baraq

vote Romney 2012


19 posted on 06/01/2012 10:00:03 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
You know it is funny, cannot understand why Romney was an acceptable alternative to McCain in 2008, but not an acceptable alternative to 0bama now.

The anti-Romney jihad around these parts has all of the reason and subtlety of a witch hunt.

20 posted on 06/01/2012 10:00:50 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
I hear ya. But, we have a candidate now and we have to accept that unless we work with him to remove Obama, we will have no influence at all. If Romney has had his positions changed by voter influence before, then we can do it again. That's something we have NO chance of doing with the community organizer.

Obama's future is set. Win or lose, he will travel the world at our expense to run America down, apologize for our success and urge his friends like the Muslim Brotherhood to keep up their good work. Our best hope is to send an overwhelmingly loud message here and abroad that America rejects the Obama ethic.

21 posted on 06/01/2012 10:01:42 AM PDT by Baynative (REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Who in their right mind would not rather have McCain as President right now?

Excellent point.

22 posted on 06/01/2012 10:02:18 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
One one recent issue (Rev. Wright) I think it's fair to draw the comparison.

As of right now, I won't vote for either one of these guys. In the case of Obama, there's no chance I would vote for him. On the other hand, Romney has a chance (although slim) to still earn my vote, should he actually campaign on conservative stances. I say ‘slim chance” since I still anticipate he will run Left after the convention. We'll see.....

23 posted on 06/01/2012 10:03:22 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy
RE: "Our best hope is to send an overwhelmingly loud message here and abroad that America rejects the Obama ethic."

I am trying to remember to say, "I think" our best hope... etc. I don't presume to be the final word on strategy.

24 posted on 06/01/2012 10:04:25 AM PDT by Baynative (REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Cain simply self-destructed.

Cain was very appealing in certain ways but he had nowhere near the depth of knowledge and political experience necessary to be an effective and successful Presidential candidate.

The bimbo eruptions were a blessing in disguise.

25 posted on 06/01/2012 10:05:32 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Romney qualifies for Anyone But Obama!


26 posted on 06/01/2012 10:11:23 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Romney qualifies for Anyone But Obama!


27 posted on 06/01/2012 10:11:57 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I understand all that. Just the comment didn’t sit right with me. Rush should care how conservative enough Romney is. He should make sure we don’t have another repeat of the last time a republican was in the White House.

What Limbaugh is saying is that republicans are very passionate about beating Obama. And that is why Rino Larry Sabato says Obama united the base and so a Rino should run with Romney. I get it. And that is why Larry said what he said.

To hell with Conservatives was what larry added because Obama is so bad they’ll take what he give them. So anybody but Obama has become Nobody But Romney. I got it.

There are pros and cons to this strategy. This is not the same as if Palin had won.

Obama is bad but after a few years so reading on the situation, it runs deeper than Obama. It’s the whole democratic party going far far left. And Republicans going Rino. And the economy being treated like junk with crony capitalism.

But yes Obama is a symptom of the problems. And needs to be defeated, but this is not going the direction it should have been. IT should have been Palin, not Mccain’s twin.

So Romney was bound to attack Obama. We’ll see what happens. I’m still for Virgil Goode, personally.


28 posted on 06/01/2012 10:12:30 AM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Rush DID NOT SAY that. Here's what he said:

"...the media and the Democrats did what they always do. They started demanding of Romney that he denounce Trump, then they threw my name in there for good measure, and that's always the way it is. It's always the way it is. Republicans are always told they have to repudiate this person, they have to apologize for that person. And Romney didn't do it. And this needs to be pointed out and noted. I know that a lot of people are still unhappy with Romney. Establishment candidate, moderate, not really conservative. Understand all that. But I'm telling you, this is not the McCain campaign. McCain, had the left demanded that he distance himself from Trump, not only would have distanced himself, he woulda gone public and kicked Trump out of his campaign. And Romney did not do that."

You need to correct your post.

29 posted on 06/01/2012 10:13:55 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

romney is not conservative enough????

he is a hard core socialist, the likes of which the republican party has never put in front of the voters before..

a vote for romney is a vote for socialism...period

time to draw the lines and choose sides...

on one side is the constitution...

on the other side is socialism..

like I said, a vote for romney is a vote for socialism...

which side of the line do the so called conservatives stand on...


30 posted on 06/01/2012 10:15:17 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
There is a large group on FR that believes (and constantly claims) Romney is the same as Bambi.

To believe that, you need to be insane.

I hoped Romney would not win, did not vote for him, don't particularly like him (understatement), supported lots of viable alternatives that were more conservative, but.....

There are now two viable choices of who to vote for that can win. You can vote for "The most destructive, the most anti-free market, anti-business, pro-Marxist, anti-life, anti-American, pro-gay, pro-muzzie, pro everything we hate with the will to do anything to sack our country administration ever!" allowing Bambi to totally ruin our country, or you can vote for Romney. I'm sorry, at this point, voting for some supposedly "conservative" choice as some kind of protest or alternative is the most stupid thing I have heard of in my life.

31 posted on 06/01/2012 10:15:17 AM PDT by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Romney qualifies for Anyone But Obama!


32 posted on 06/01/2012 10:23:01 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Romney qualifies for Anyone But Obama!


33 posted on 06/01/2012 10:23:11 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Commiserations...it's all just a damned mess of misgivings about what is and what could have been

In contrast to my vehement opposition to Obama for all that he is, what he stands for, and what he's doing, I am NOT going to be a flagrant FR supporter for him. I'll vote for him, but I'll still not campaign for him, quietly hoping that a majority of voters see the true difference this time.

34 posted on 06/01/2012 10:25:49 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Many FReepers here have stated they will not vote for Romney because they don’t want to compromise their principles. I understand and respect that, as I am not in the habit of compromising mine, either. But in my opinion, at this critical junction in our country’s history, it is not a time to stand defiant on principles. It is a time for us to step up to save the Republic, and we have a duty to do so by any means we can, and if that means voting for the lesser of two evils, so be it.

Although I wish that it were, this election is no longer about getting a true conservative into the White House. Short of divine intervention, that dream is currently comatose. Note that I did not say “dead” as I believe it will happen, but just not this time around. However, if Obama get re-elected, the dream is dead.

This election has become a desperate fight to save the Republic. Not only for us, but for the future generations of Americans who will have to live with the consequences of the decisions we make here and now. The decisions we make today will – either positively or negatively – directly impact their lives in the future. Most of us – myself included – probably won’t be here in 30 years. But our children – our posteriety – will. And they will live and die based on the descisions we make today.

The left doesn’t stand on any principles. They never have and they never will. They are Godless, secular, materialistic entities. They don’t care about right or wrong. They don’t fight fair. They will cheat, lie and steal in order to keep Obama in power. I believe it is time we fought back. I believe it is time for us to set aside principles momentarily and make the hard decisions that we must make in the present in order to save this country for the future.

First, Romney is nothing more than an opportunistic RINO politician. He will bend in any direction that a wind will blow him. He is not grounded by any principle of which I am aware which means he is guided by whatever issue is most strongly and dearly held by the group that has the most power to put him into the Oval Office. Since he is a “Republican” that means we are the ones who can put him there.

Romney certainly is not motivated by higher ideas or by patriotism – he will do what he needs to do to get elected to Presidency because he believes it’s “his turn.” He will side with and pander to the group tha can get him in there in order to get elected.

Secondly, it is for this reason I don’t perceive Romney to be a hardcore Socialist who would continue the devastating destruction that Obama has wreaked upon our nation. If Romney can get elected as President, he’s going to want to have what every President wants to have and that is a second term. In order to do that he must continue to bend in the direction of those that put him there. In other words, he can be controlled.

Thirdly, Obama cannot and will not be controlled. Our testicular-challenged “Representatives” have shamefully demonstrated time and again their sophomoric inability to protect and defend the Constitution as they have sworn to do. If Obama is re-elected we are guaranteed to lose the Republic – guaranteed no matter what. Obama has already proven beyond any doubt that he has absolutely no respect for the Constitution. Given a second term, Obama will destroy our country. In four years, the America that we grew up knowing and loving will cease to exist.

Does this mean I want Romney to be President for 2 terms? No. To me, putting Romney into the Oval Office is nothing more than keeping the chair warm for the next four years while we (a) conduct damage control on the effects of Obama’s socialist policies already put into place, and (b) find and build up a strong conservative candidate for 2016. In the meantime, Romney can be controlled, especially if we keep the House. Even more so if we can keep the House and take the Senate.

While Romney is keeping the chair warm, we focus on the 2014 mid-term elections. We force more RINOs out of congress and increase the number of conservatives. From there we look to 2016. By that time we should have a solid conservative candidate to run against Romney. Congress will be more conservative, the economy will start to turn around. Fence sitting Moderates will begin to see the Republican party as a vehicle for positive change, bolstering our 2016 Presidential candidate.

It’s a strategy, not a solution. This is a chess game that, in the end we must win. We must look beyond the next four years. It isn’t a matter of standing on our principles at this point in time. It’s a matter of swallowing the bitter pill that must be swallowed in order to get rid of the infection that is festering in the White House and causing the slow, painful death of our country.

I would rather compromise my principles on this specific issue, right now, than to sacrifice my child’s freedom in the future. I will gladly take all the vitriol I expect to have thrown at me for my decision now, than to hang my head in shame as all our children live and suffer under Socialistic rule in the future.

If we fail to stop Socialism here and now, in 2012, we fail all those who come after us. We will go down in the history books as the ones that didn’t care enough to save our country for future generations. By inaction, we waste all the sacrifices of those who came before us and who fought and died to preserve the Republic and liberty. Personally, I don’t want that on my conscience.

Bottom line, we either stand on the sidelines and allow an avowed Socialist to continue raping this country, or we put a “placeholder” in there through which we can control the ship for at least the next four years.
35 posted on 06/01/2012 10:25:55 AM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

The era of mushiness continues


36 posted on 06/01/2012 10:26:25 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
I'm sorry, at this point, voting for some supposedly "conservative" choice as some kind of protest or alternative is the most stupid thing I have heard of in my life.

As opposed to the great wisdom of continuing to vote for people who don't represent us.

Sure.

You betcha.

*eyeroll*

37 posted on 06/01/2012 10:26:39 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Party like it's 1860.- America's Party - www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Because there is more information about him now.


38 posted on 06/01/2012 10:29:06 AM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

We will all unfortunately be begging for Romney by November.


39 posted on 06/01/2012 10:30:36 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (We are the 53%. 47% of Americans pay no taxes; end the free ride...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Says the troll who posts in order to make money as that supposed "alternative true conservative".

Kindly pound sound you big phony.

40 posted on 06/01/2012 10:32:25 AM PDT by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

RutRow George...looks like its time to give Rush the same treatment as Coulter. Just waiting to see the posts...and waiting...


41 posted on 06/01/2012 10:36:14 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan
I don’t like Mittens either but like it or not, he is what we have to run with. Only Stalin, Hitler and Mugabe could be worse than Obama and two of them are dead so lets beat Obama.

What you said (although I'd throw Chairman Mao into the mix, but he's dead as well).

I'll say this much for Romney: unlike the pathetic McCain, he at least appears to be willing to take the gloves off, which you have to do. As long as he doesn't say that we have nothing to fear from a 2nd term for Comrade Zero.

42 posted on 06/01/2012 10:36:14 AM PDT by Marathoner (If the election was Obama vs. Satan I'd have to flip a coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Looks like you and I agree with Mark Levin. You Vote for your Candidate in the Primary. You Vote for your Party's Candidate in the General.

The Votes are in. My guy Newt didn't make it. Obama and his sycophants hate the America we love, Romney doesn't. I will Vote for Romney because there is no other choice. Others here disagree. That is their decision. I am done arguing the point.

43 posted on 06/01/2012 10:36:27 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Confucius say, short note better than long memory....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

No, what Romney ACTUALLY said, and what all of his ads here in WA state are saying is the following:

“Repeal and REPLACE Obamacare”

With what? Pray, tell us!

In essence, “I’m just a little less socialist than my opponent. Good way to look at it is that I’m the Chinese version of communism, if you compare it to the Russian version. I’m not for a planned economy, but I’ll definitely tell you what you can do in a way that we can all make money doing it.”


44 posted on 06/01/2012 10:37:10 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Mozilla, imho, our conservative candidates ran on four things:their NAME, their RECORD, their conservative PHILOSOPHY, and VIRTUALLY NO MONEY! A financial shoestring, a fine record, proven solid conservatism and in Newt’s case, even historic accomplishment for the Republican Party that can not be matched.

What did they get in return? They got a crushing loss, an embarrassing one actually and campaign debt, which Romney likely paid off, buying their support.

The nomination is stacked in advance of even announcing, recognized by the size of your advance team and machine. Romney had it. His contributions to select campaigns over the past FOUR years bought him DC loyalty and plenty of support down the road to be used on que, as needed.

This new way of empowering a contender is now the general trend. Hillary used it too for her own coronation and it would have worked, but for an annomaly named Barack Obama.

Romney built his machine beginning after his ‘08 campaign and now I am watching Sarah Palin. She has withdrawn from the fire and brimstone, sidled up to Orin Hatch, and by doing so has learned to quietly play the DC machine game (money) and garnering DC chits for the future, either for her own run or plenty of future money to name someone else.

Mainly this tells me our candidates were not that serious about winning but for exposure. Newt wanted back in DC politics, and Santorum is perenially looking for a job or trying to somewhere cut a better deal. ick.

Point being, we should be looking ahead and watch who is building a PAC, contributing to pivital campaigns and keeping up appearances and where.

For the first time I think Sarah may be building up for something. If she can shape her foreign policy and shape her economic policy into a coherent package, showing more depth and mastery of the subject she could develop gravitas.

However, I think for the time being that any rah rah for war and more interventions is a campaign killer has played itself out even on the Republican side. Our military are exhausted and the corps at least at the top is dismantled.


45 posted on 06/01/2012 10:40:41 AM PDT by RitaOK (I DID vote against Romney! Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I agree with you.


46 posted on 06/01/2012 10:43:38 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I agree with you.


47 posted on 06/01/2012 10:43:58 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
I had the good fortune of hearing and talking to Breitbart a couple of weeks before he died.

In his speech (I'm paraphrasing) he told an audience of conservatives we all needed to work like hell for the candidate we supported, vote for them, but in the end, after it was all over we needed to unite to defeat "The most destructive, the most anti-free market, anti-business, pro-Marxist, anti-life, anti-American, pro-gay, pro-muzzie, pro everything we hate with the will to do anything to sack our country administration ever!"

He also said to not unite behind the candidate who wins would be to join "The most destructive, the most anti-free market, anti-business, pro-Marxist, anti-life, anti-American, pro-gay, pro-muzzie, pro everything we hate with the will to do anything to sack our country administration ever!"

I even agreed with him then, and that was when there was still a good hope of getting a conservative as our nominee.

48 posted on 06/01/2012 10:45:41 AM PDT by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Politicians are liars.

The differences between the Kenyan bastard and Romney is that one is half white the other is white. And one is a homosexual and the other is not.


49 posted on 06/01/2012 10:48:20 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Like what? Did people forget he was Governor of Massachusetts?
50 posted on 06/01/2012 10:48:36 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson