I wasn't doing the math, I was doing accounting.
I don't really have to do the math. You may think reality is determined by what gets posted at Free Republic, but reality and the math is being done on the ground in the real world.
Places like Texas are moving forward because they are planning on growth. Sure, a nat gas surplus may come along but that is temporary and planning is looking out into 2035 and 2050.
Whether you call it Cylindra or Solyndra, technology is being developed and it has been subsidized, it is being subsidized, and it will be subsidized.
SCOTUS said in in 2007 that CO2 is a pollutant and SCOTUS said last year that only the EPA has the authority to regulate CO2
Well, Ben Flicklin, if you think Solyndra had anything to do with developing technology as opposed to 100% pure corruption, there is no point talking to you any more.
Ooops, Ben Ficklin. Was just a typo...
CO2 is a plant growth stimulant and that is about it at anything close to current concentrations. And by “anything close” I mean up to 2X to 3X.
Why do you want to starve subsistence farmers?
The fact the the EPA can regulate to extinction fire and breathing, which is a natural outgrowth of their current stance, without any involvement from Congress, pure Executive fiat only, no public debate of any sort, is proof positive the EPA needs to be knocked down if not destroyed completely so that we can start over.