Posted on 06/06/2012 7:55:18 PM PDT by mandaladon
Of course, the very essence of the Fabian approach is deception.
William Flax
If you plan any updates to your section "Chapter I--American Constitutional Overview", I humbly recommend that you add under your section "framers were very specific in their grants of power" a link to FEDERALIST No. 41 General View of the Powers Conferred by The Constitution by James Madison, and show Madison's clear articulation of the limits on "general welfare" and commerce regulation.
Madison in #41 was laying out the arguments for national defense and DIRECTLY connected the "commerce" and "general welfare" clauses to national defense, not what has been distorted today as "welfare"
"The power of levying and borrowing money, being the sinew of that which is to be exerted in the national defense, is properly thrown into the same class with it. This power, also, has been examined already with much attention, and has, I trust, been clearly shown to be necessary, both in the extent and form given to it by the Constitution.Madison's words and thoughts could not be more clear-cut if a person objectively reads #41 and makes the syntactic, linguistic connections of part 1 with part 2.[snip]
Some, who have not denied the necessity of the power of taxation, have grounded a very fierce attack against the Constitution, on the language in which it is defined. It has been urged and echoed, that the power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States," amounts to an unlimited commission to exercise every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense or general welfare. No stronger proof could be given of the distress under which these writers labor for objections, than their stooping to such a misconstruction.
Actually, in Chapter I, I was trying to be brief. But any careful reading of the Constitution, in context, will lead to Madison's articulated limits. The delegated powers, each relate to specific functions; and those functions are all consistent with an established relationship, between the Governments, State & Federal, wherein the General Powers, other than those covered by the specific functions delegated, are left to the States & local communities (subdivisions of the States). There is all sorts of intrinsic evidence of a logical pattern that makes it very clear that the general powers to deal with the problems of individual citizens and groups, were never intended to be Federal.
This view is also supported by the historic fact, discussed in America Grounded On Experience & Reason, that the founders' approach, differed by 180 degrees from that of the modern Socialists, Communists & those some mistakenly call "Liberals," which is theory, not experience, driven.
Of course, one of the ultimate examples of the fallacy of the Left, are the Keynesians like Krugman, who are endlessly trying to fit reality into their artificial models.
Cheers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.