Posted on 06/07/2012 9:23:42 AM PDT by scottjewell
A 14-year-old radio show host has come out and condemned President Barack Obama for 'making kids gay' by supporting homosexual's civil rights. Caiden Cowger, who has interviewed the likes of Herman Caine and hobnobbed with Rudy Giuliani, posted a four and a half minute video on May 26 in which he insists homosexuality is a choice - and a sin. The video immediately drew the ire of dozens of people and was eventually removed from YouTube for promoting hate speech, while Caiden's account was hacked and deleted, the teen told the MailOnline.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2155710/Caiden-Cowger-Teen-radio-host-says-Obama-makes-kids-gay-YouTube-video.html#ixzz1x7oWYLKL
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Even worse, there were comments on Facebook, referring to this child as "a hot and bothered homo who wants a **** in his mouth", and these comments were not viewed as hate speech.
He has now reposted the video under a new YouTube Channel, but there is talk of having it flagged as Hate Speech right now, so if anyone wants to see it, do so while it still exists:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCV40pnyaWY&feature=plcp
Is it even possible to make kids gay?
Hate speech? Just because a person speaks out against the perversion of homosexuality. Makes it hate speech? So is it hate speech when perverted homosexuals speak out against heterosexuality?
Republicans are so intolerant. What do the Democrats need to do to get everyone to encourage diversity and respect all speech even that which you disagree with?
Sorry, looks like I mis-read it the first time. Never mind.
As a Psychologist, I would have to say yes. In more than 25 years of practice, every single person that I have counseled who lived a homosexual lifestyle reported that they had been sexually abused (forced to participate) as a child by someone of the same gender. I have counseled more than 500 such individuals to date.
Herman “Caine”? or the “Cain” who was one of the GOP presidential hopefuls?
Anyhow, while the prodigy might be overstating things by saying these weird policies “make” kids gay, it’s not far from the truth. They pose temptations and influences that children of that age are generally not equipped to deal with. Even as is, it’s only an opinion. Hate speech? Anything that suggests there’s a downside to being “gay” and that it’s possible to influence or exercise self control about “gay” behavior seems to be deemed ipso facto hate speech. Sloppy “science” if not nakedly agenda driven.
Thanks. Statistics like that have always made me wonder how the first homo came to be?
That is the point: His speech, in our era, is merely unpopular. Thus, the First Amendment was designed to PROTECT it. Condemning it as hate speech violates the US Constitution at the most BASIC level.
“Thanks. Statistics like that have always made me wonder how the first homo came to be?”
Clearly, there are indeed natural-born homosexuals. These have rights to privacy and to autonomy. However, the indoctrination of vast numbers who in another era would not have been gay, or would not have chosen to act on it, is truly a problem.
Doc, isn’t such induced homosexuality often, if not always, a kind of learned craving for being bullied, so to speak? The desire for continuation of a molestation would fall in that category. God never intended man to accept arbitrary imposition of another man’s will, but man has lost his way and hatred rules rather than proper love.
The trick was to make those who chose to practice homosexual behaviors a separate class of individuals. e.g. 'gays'. Then, to label them as an 'oppressed minority', thus subtly equating those practicing homosexual behavior with people who are genetically a racial minority and who are given - by liberals and the government - 'oppressed minority' status. That transforms any criticism of homosexual behavior into 'hate speech' because it's being used against, not a behavior, oh no, but a class of people, 'gays'.
This house of cards may be flimsy but, unfortunately, the majority don't see it and go right along with the canard that to criticize homosexual behavior is actually 'hating' and, worse yet, hating a protected minority! Thus, our free speech rights are, once again, truncated and the American people meekly accept it. This way lies slavery.
“Hate Speech” will always be used to condemn someone supporting Judeo-Christian morals.
“Hate Speech” will never be used to describe the words of groups like LaRaza and the New Black Pampers.
Understand how Newspeak works? Freedom is slavery, ect.
Yes, I agree with you. Of course it is agenda-driven.
Hermain Cain, the former presidential candidate , appeared on Caiden’s show, as well as many other political figures.
Thanks
Right, but when is something going to rise up and counter-attack this Newspeak? It never had to go this far: It was allowed to continue unchecked for decades. Who is actually going to come out and stand up for this young man, as he goes down in the flames of hate speech deletions?
Right you are: The fact that the Fist Amendment - designed specifically to protect unpopular speech, a MUST in any democracy - is being tossed away and mere opinion flimsily and hastily considered “hate speech”, by YouTube, an internet GIANT, shows we are in the last stages, the virtual death throes. But as I said elsewhere, why did we allow this to happen? 40 years ago, it was only a gleam in a liberal activist’s eye. Who allowed this?
Anyone that tells the truth about the perverted homosexual agenda and life is “hate speech”, as if hate speech should override the 1st Amendment anyway..
"The very people attacking this kid scream tolerance but they themselves are intolerant.
Liberal, they name is hypocrite."
Guarantee you that back when homosexuality was still “in the closet” and sexual pervervsion including pornography, rampant sex amoung the young, that there were as many “gay” tweens (those just discovering their sexual feeling and bodies between 12-20 or so..).
So I say yes..our government/school and pop-culture have made kids “gay”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.