Posted on 06/11/2012 12:36:15 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Yep—Destruction of Responsibility and Ethics.
Replace religion (particularly the superior Christian Ethics) with moral relativism and psychiatry which makes everyone dependent and drugged.
HA HA. This is the Marxist camel which kills God-—to destroy Virtue. It destroys the concepts of Right and Wrong which destroys individualism and responsibility for actions. This destroys all relationships so that government has to care for everyone since the Natural Family connections will no longer exist or care. Nanny State is ruler and controller of all action and they can drug the populace into a drone, happy state where they won’t notice their own slavery.
What about all the good people who became addicted to oxycotin or are we talking about illegal drugs here such as pot or crack?
Obama can’t accept his moral failings. He is diseased.
Things like this usually have a purpose. What news might we be about to hear?
Now we get to coddle alcoholics and drug addicts, in addition to taking care of every whim of the folks who prefer not to work, as well as those who capitalize on a minor disability, turning it into the equivalent of winning the lottery.
Here I sit at work, grateful to God that I have work and the health to do it. Forget retirement; I guess I’ll be right here when the hearse scoops me up on the way to the cemetery.
How many people am I supporting now?
How long before the Republic Party has the guts to call this Marxism?
So you're opposed to the nanny-state War On Drugs?
Republic Party = Republican Party...sorry.
|
|
The White House is to morals what east is to west.
Pill for it? Try new "Cialis For One". For those times when you don't have two bathtubs.
I suggest the problem here is that we’re trying to force a complex phenomenon into one of two boxes: disease or moral failing.
Pretty obviously, to me anyway, addiction in its advanced stages becomes something resembling a disease. But most people have to work at getting the disease. And making the choice to work at it is a moral failing.
In the Lord of the Rings, the desire for the Ring was an addiction that could not be resisted once it had gained power over a person. But numerous people in the story made the choice to refuse to start the process that would lead to this addiction. Numerous others chose, as a moral failing, to walk down that road.
Moochelle is planning a vacation to Jamaica?
It may be a disease but it can be controlled by strength of character
So Obama is seriously diseased...
Is addiction a moral failing if it was come by in a "bad" way, but not if it was come by in a "good" way?
Some (not all) addiction is best characterized as a disease. The hold of the drugs is stronger than the will. Addiction can occur on a first use with some drugs, such as crack. The real problem is how to separate the true addicts from the wastrels.
If we assume it IS a disease, it is one that a person without moral failings can avoid falling pray to, and which a person without moral failings can keep in remission.
The rest is hogwash - especially when government types want me to pay for the “treatment,” or for the drugs, or for the stupid WOD that has been a total failure due to corruption and misuse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.