Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yoko Ono London Exhibit: Dirt Piles In Serpentine Gallery
Newsoxy ^ | June 20, 2012 | John Lester

Posted on 06/20/2012 7:12:17 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer

Yoko Ono has unveiled her latest art for the first time in a decade called “To The Light” in the Serpentine Gallery, but some might be confused on what it actually means.

For example, in one work of art on display there are three identical mounds of earth labeled “Country A,” “Country B,” and “Country C,” in front of the classic “War Is Over” poster she made with John Lennon.

There are also suspended World War II helmets hanging on clear wire from the ceiling and inside there are blue jigsaw puzzle pieces.

The Daily Mail reported that it includes new and existing installations, films and performances, as well as archive material relating to several key early works.

There are several screens on a wall and one of six videos includes her 1968 slow-motion of John Lennon smiling.

It is part of the London 2012 Festival, a 12-week UK-wide celebration featuring internationally-renowned artists from Midsummer’s Day on 21 June to the final day of the Paralympic Games on 9 September 2012.

Yoko Ono has worked as an artist, film-maker, poet, musician, writer, performance artist and peace activist for over five decades.

Alongside her exhibition staged inside the Gallery, Yoko Ono has also put together a largescale participatory project, called #smilesfilm in Kensington Gardens.

Visitors from all over the world can drop in to a specially-designed photo booth installed outside the Serpentine Gallery and record their smiles.

These images will then be collected to make #smilesfilm, which will be exhibited in a physical form on a screen at the Serpentine Gallery and presented globally in digital form on a dedicated website, smilesfilm.com, and apps for iPhone and iPad.

“Ono’s project at the Serpentine will tap into the transformative potential of the smile, which can change an individual’s view, but also radiate out into the world. Ono associates this transmission of positive energy with healing and peace,” the gallery said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I'll say this: At least her work hasn't gone downhill over the years.
1 posted on 06/20/2012 7:12:24 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Just don’t allow her to sing.Prevent THAT by any means required.


2 posted on 06/20/2012 7:15:16 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

That is one app that isn’t appear on my phone and pad.


3 posted on 06/20/2012 7:22:01 PM PDT by razorback-bert (I'm in shape. Round is a shape isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Pretty standard stuff... If the art critics don't understand it, it must be "art." And the greater their misunderstanding and confusion, the better the "art" must be.

Mark

4 posted on 06/20/2012 7:23:40 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Without Lennon’s last name, she would just be another crazy old bag lady/filthy hippie.


5 posted on 06/20/2012 7:34:31 PM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Yoko Ono’s only true “Art” was looking like she does and still getting John Lennon to marry her so she could live off of his money.

And I’m not putting any Asian person down. She’s just ugly.


6 posted on 06/20/2012 7:37:24 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I used to think that she was the worst singer in the universe. But now I realise that her singing talent far exceeds her artistic talent.


7 posted on 06/20/2012 7:40:40 PM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Yoko Ono is crazier than a sh**house rat. Always has been since she first arrived on the scene on John Lennon’s arm.


8 posted on 06/20/2012 7:43:21 PM PDT by onemiddleamerican (FUBO and all your terrorist buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
“Ono’s project at the Serpentine will tap into the transformative potential of the smile, which can change an individual’s view, but also radiate out into the world. Ono associates this transmission of positive energy with healing and peace,” the gallery said.

It's times like this that I wish Sam Kinison were still around to offer his perspective: "IT'S DIRT!!!!! IT'S THREE F****** MOUNDS OF DIRT!!!!! OHHHHH! OOHHHHHHH!!!"

9 posted on 06/20/2012 7:46:52 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
“Ono’s project at the Serpentine will tap into the transformative potential of the smile, which can change an individual’s view, but also radiate out into the world. Ono associates this transmission of positive energy with healing and peace,” the gallery said.


10 posted on 06/20/2012 7:56:54 PM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Modern art is best viewed as a typical con game. The “artist”, is the confidence man, and the “afficianados” are the marks. Just like any con game, the con man plays upon the conceits and emotional needs of the mark, and offers an illusory product or service that the mark will desire. In this case, the artist allows the afficianados to believe that they have some highly refined taste that separates them from the common man, because they are able to detect the artistic value in the apparent trash that the con artist is hawking. Also, like in any other typical con game, the con man doesn’t take the mark’s money by force, they simply set up a situation favorable to themselves where the mark will willingly fork over the money.

This is a somewhat unique con though, because there seems to be a never-ending supply of marks, who will never realize or admit they’ve been conned, so the value of the “art” doesn’t evaporate like most fraudulent products. They can resell the crap to another mark and even make a profit!

Viewed through this lens, it’s no wonder that a professional con artist like Yoko was able to weasel her way into dominating the life of a succeptible mark like John Lennon. It was probably a very simple job for her to detect his subconscious yearnings and play upon them until he truly believed that he was not being taken advantage of by her. It really would be no different than the way that pimps convince prostitutes that they really need them and that the pimp is doing them a favor by taking 90% of their earnings and abusing them.


11 posted on 06/20/2012 8:02:05 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Yoko fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down.
Her singing is an insult to the very word, let alone the concept.

Never cared for her one whit


12 posted on 06/20/2012 8:10:45 PM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

13 posted on 06/20/2012 8:40:06 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

I still remember one reporter’s opinion in I think the New York Post, when Lennon first began with her:

“John Lennon’s new girlfriend looks something like a feminine ernest borgnine”


14 posted on 06/20/2012 8:40:31 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

One of the biggest manipulators of all times.


15 posted on 06/20/2012 8:45:47 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

What an ass, she needs to get a life.


16 posted on 06/20/2012 8:58:27 PM PDT by trailboss800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

The degeneration of art began with the Postmodernists/Progressives/Socialists/Fabians/Atheists.

Dewey, a Fabian Socialist, (patron saint of all education particularly in the Soviet Union and America), does not allow teachers elevating works of art and giving some “intrinsic worth” over others. It is all equal. (It is the experience and the emotions). This avoids aesthetic judgments which would ultimately result in fostering division between laboring classes and leisure classes. (From John Dewey and the Decline of American Education by Edmondson III)

We have to burn all school curricula embedded with Deweyan philosophy. ALL OF IT-—it is nasty and Godless. DOE is evil.

We have to get back the minds of the future-—back to American Ideals, not that of communists.


17 posted on 06/20/2012 8:58:50 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

She IS ugly.
Such a big wide flat face on that small body.


18 posted on 06/21/2012 12:01:06 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico

Yes...I refer to that as the Lennon Syndrome...I’m one of the richest and most famous men in the world...can get any smoking babe I want...and the aisle parts...and there she is...her name rhymes with Choke Hold! No better sound effect for that than when she “sings”!


19 posted on 06/21/2012 12:49:25 AM PDT by gr8eman (Ron Swanson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

I always thought somehow she had something to do with that whackjob shooting Lennon. My first thought when it happened was...Who has the most to gain from this?...DING! DING! DING!...WE HAVE A WINNER!


20 posted on 06/21/2012 12:57:29 AM PDT by gr8eman (Ron Swanson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
"modern art"

Pretty much my views on the subject. Art ran out of ideas more than one hundred years ago. Modern artists couldn't duplicate the fantastic works by artists from centuries previous, so they had to come up with some kind of gimmick. Abstract art emerged (or oozed to the surface), and we're stuck with it. You're supposed to look at those globs of paint on the wall and see beauty...or something. If you don't, you're just an uncultured, troglodyte philistine who has no appreciation of the finer things in life.

However, the artist and his ally in crime, the art critic, will tell you what is good and what is not. Please have your checkbook open and be ready to pay the millions this dreck er art is worth.

21 posted on 06/21/2012 5:22:43 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

There’s always been that possibility. She looks mean and totally self centered.


22 posted on 06/21/2012 5:44:06 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
I'm generally no fan of modern art, but you're art history is a bit off.

"Modern artists couldn't duplicate the fantastic works by artists from centuries previous, so they had to come up with some kind of gimmick."

Picasso said something to the effect that, "It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child." If you look at his early work, it supports that. Picasso painted this when he was 14...

...and this when he was 15:

His foray into cubism was an deliberate and contrived effort to simultaneously depict objects from multiple perspectives. I'm not a huge fan of cubism, but certainly, some of the pieces are not unaesthetic:

Furthermore, cubism was not without precedent and was a natural progression of the post-impressionist style of Cezanne and others...

"Abstraction," in and of its own right is not a bad thing. Some of the most highly regarded painters of the 19th Century dabbled with abstraction, giving their paintings titles in order to make them appear to be something real...

James Whistler -Nocturne Westminster Place

Joseph Turner - Steamer in a Snowstorm

Again, I'm not putting up any kind of defense of a lot of the crap that calls itself modern art, I'm merely saying that abstraction, in and of itself should not be immediately discounted. If we dismissed anything that was not rigidly representational we'd have to write off such things as the Book of Kells...

Having said all that, and bringing the discussion back home to the topic of this thread, if three piles of dirt is "art", my dog is on the cutting edge of the aesthetic scene in the 21st century :-)

23 posted on 06/21/2012 6:23:12 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

She could crap on a Ritz Cracker and some “enlightened artisan” will pay her six-figures for the “privilege” of displaying it in his gallery.

She had a display at the Contemporary Arts Musuem in Cincinnati about twenty years which consisted of an old rotary dial phone on a stand in a white room. She would occassionally dial it up and chat with whoever answered.


24 posted on 06/21/2012 6:43:37 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Sorry, Picasso should have stuck with his 14 yr. old vision. My view of modern art remains the same. Just call me Mr. Philistine.


25 posted on 06/21/2012 6:48:35 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson