Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US SCOTUS Decision (10am) Open thread for Thursday June 21st, 2012

Posted on 06/21/2012 2:58:37 AM PDT by Perdogg

Original thread



Today the court is handing down decisions, possibly in the Arizona Immigration Law case.

Make your Prediction on:

1. Az Immigration law

2a. Heathcare Mandate

2b. Heathcare Servability

3. Stolen Valor Act


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: notbreakingnews; scotus; scotuslivewatch; scotusobamacare; scotuswatch; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last
To: NeverEVERKerry

I’ll copy/paste for those that can’t get in:

10:01
Amy:
First opinion is in Southern Union.

10:01
Amy:
Justice Sotomayor has opinion. The rule of Apprendi v. NJ applies to the imposition of criminal fines. The First Circuit is reversed. The vote is 6-3.

10:01
Amy:
Justice Breyer dissents, joined by Kennedy and Alito.

10:02
Amy:
We have at least one more opinion.

10:02
Amy:
Southern Union was about whether a jury needed to find facts leading to the imposition of a higher criminal fine.

10:02
Kali:
Our case page for Southern Union is here. I will link to the opinion once it’s up on the Court’s website.

10:03
Amy:
To answer a commenter, you may not have been waiting for Southern Union, but Southern Union was probably waiting for Southern Union.

10:04
Amy:
Yes, to answer another commenter, no opinions from Justice Kagan today.

10:04
Amy:
No majority opinions, at least.

10:05
Kali:
Apologies if you’re having trouble with the case page not loading; there are 22,000 people on the live blog right now. If you can figure our how to take turns it may load faster...

10:05
Amy:
Knox v. SEIU, 10-1121. Opinion by Alito.

10:06
Amy:
The Ninth Circuit is reversed. Justice Sotomayor concurs in the judgment, joined by Ginsburg. It appears to be 7-2; Breyer dissented, joined by Kagan.

10:06
Kali:
Here’s a link to the opinion in Southern Union: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-94a1b2.pdf

10:06
Amy:
The Court rules that the case is not moot, first. It then rules on the merits: the union’s treatment of nonmembers who had opted out when they got notice of the dues ran afoul of the First Amendment.

10:06 Amy:
This is not the final opinion. We have at least one more.

10:07
Amy:
To answer another question, yes, when you become the Chief Justice you automatically become the most senior Justice and get to go last with opinions, even if you have not been on the Court as long as some other Justices.


81 posted on 06/21/2012 7:09:52 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; All

Knox VS. SEIU is actually a HUGE Decision that hits directly at Union/Democrat Revenue streams, especially in California.

But, you won’t be hearing about it on the evening news tonite.


82 posted on 06/21/2012 7:10:24 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:08
Amy:
I think that the sign that there is another opinion is very high-tech — like another box of opinions waiting to be released at the Public Information Office.

10:09
Kali:
The opinion in Knox is up on the Court’s website: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1121c4d6.pdf

10:10
Amy:
The physical copies of the opinions are released as they are announced in the Courtroom. The Justices read summaries of their opinions (not the same as the syllabus that gets printed) as they are released.


83 posted on 06/21/2012 7:11:08 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
FLASH!!! Just in! The SC has ruled that ObamaCare is

LOL Dude don't do that to me for reals. :D

84 posted on 06/21/2012 7:12:05 AM PDT by erod (This Chicagoan will crawl over broken glass to vote the fake Chicagoan Obama out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: erod

Yeah. I fell for it too.


85 posted on 06/21/2012 7:12:38 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Look for the union label, then buy elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
ears will ignore them and dare someone to stop him from implementing them anyway.

I think you are on to something there!!! Hope the rest of voting America is as observant as you.
86 posted on 06/21/2012 7:12:43 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
US SCOTUS Decision

Sponsored by the Department of Redundancy Department. ;^)

87 posted on 06/21/2012 7:12:55 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:12
Amy:
I believe that the oral summaries are released much later in the year, which is why there have been requests to have the audio/video released on the same day as health care. Those requests are unlikely to be granted.

10:13
Amy:
Lyle is not in the Courtroom. He is in the pressroom and gets the hard copies of the opinions as they are released and then comes to the phone to talk to me.

10:13
Amy:
Just to clarify — there isn’t video at the Court. People would like for there to be video. There will be no video.


88 posted on 06/21/2012 7:13:19 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
A slapdown of SEIU and the Ninth Circus at the same time is something to savor
89 posted on 06/21/2012 7:13:33 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "One can argue about whose fault it is, but not ... whose responsibility it is: it's his")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; Perdogg; onyx; RedMDer; trisham; TheOldLady; musicman; vox_freedom; JoeProBono; ...

Live blogging SCOTUS

9:58

Amy:
The Court will not announce a list of which opinions we will get today. We will find out one at a time. The Court starts with the most junior Justice who has an opinion and then goes in reverse seniority, ending with the Chief Justice.

Continuing updates (scroll to bottom of screen)

http://scotusblog.wpengine.com/

( hope it’s soon.. late night .. need more sleep .. Lord, in Your abiding mercy, please preserve our dear nation as intended, confound our enemies )


90 posted on 06/21/2012 7:13:43 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Redundancy can be quite catchy as well as contagious.


91 posted on 06/21/2012 7:15:35 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (You're screwy! You're spaced! You lost the recall race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:14
Amy:
Here comes Lyle to tell us that Justice Breyer is reading from his dissent in Knox. That’s why we have no additional news for you regarding the next opinion.

10:15
Amy:
We don’t know what the next opinion is. We expect another one, which would not be from either Justice Sotomayor or Justice Kagan, because the Court goes in order of reverse seniority and the Knox case was by Justice Alito. So it will be Alito or one of the more senior Justices.

Tom:
The union dues case may be quite significant — there is not only the dissent but a narrower concurring opinion that says that “[t]he majority thus decides, for the very first time, that the First Amendment does require an opt-in system in some circumstances [for union dues]: the levying of a special assessment or dues increase.”

10:16
Amy:
We don’t know how many more we are getting today, just that Lyle has told us that there will be at least one more. And he’s been doing this for over fifty years, so I trust him.


92 posted on 06/21/2012 7:15:51 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

10:15

Tom:
The union dues case may be quite significant — there is not only the dissent but a narrower concurring opinion that says that “[t]he majority thus decides, for the very first time, that the First Amendment does require an opt-in system in some circumstances [for union dues]: the levying of a special assessment or dues increase.”

That Michigan union chick must be very, very disappointed


93 posted on 06/21/2012 7:15:51 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "One can argue about whose fault it is, but not ... whose responsibility it is: it's his")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Amen


94 posted on 06/21/2012 7:15:57 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (But that's just me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: All

You see Justice Breyer re Knox recent post at live blogging SCOTUS above. Here’s the case:

****

Supreme Court Soon to Rule on Knox v. SEIU

SEIU Political Fundraising Mechanism Operates Unconstitutionally, Says Horace Cooper of National Center for Public Policy Research

Washington, DC - The United States Supreme Court will shortly issue a ruling in Knox v. SEIU, a California case about the misuse of compulsory union dues and the subject of a new National Policy Analysis paper by National Center for Public Policy Research Adjunct Fellow Horace Cooper.

Rest
http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Knox_v_SEIU_061812.html


95 posted on 06/21/2012 7:16:35 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: NeverEVERKerry

10:18

Tom:
So on the majority’s rationale, the Court is 5-4 in the union dues case, divided on ideological lines. But in the result it is 6-3.


96 posted on 06/21/2012 7:17:38 AM PDT by NeverEVERKerry (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: All

On Twitter it says Breyer is reading. They go in order of least to most senior, so justices more senior thn Breyer should be next? Assuming Twitter person is correct...


97 posted on 06/21/2012 7:18:30 AM PDT by PghBaldy (I eagerly await the next news about the struggles of Elizabeth Sacheen Littlefeather Warren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

I love it and Sotomayor seems to be showing loyalty to Roberts and voted with the majority. Kagan is another Ginsburg.


98 posted on 06/21/2012 7:18:39 AM PDT by Solson (The Voters stole the election! And the establishment wants it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

SEIU loses 7-2.


99 posted on 06/21/2012 7:18:39 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

I know it was before 6am


100 posted on 06/21/2012 7:19:20 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson