Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With the options available, why did Obama choose to invoke executive privilege?
qando.ne ^ | 21 June, 2012 | Bruce McQuain

Posted on 06/23/2012 6:31:20 PM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Interesting summation of choices.
1 posted on 06/23/2012 6:31:32 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Gunwalker / Murdergate ping.


2 posted on 06/23/2012 6:32:43 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The ‘Constitutional Law ‘ professor in the Oval Office apparently does NOT know how the law works for Executive Priviledge.

He is hanging both himself & Holder, IMO.


3 posted on 06/23/2012 6:38:07 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Calling out a torpedo to see if it can hole the SS 0bama.


4 posted on 06/23/2012 6:45:23 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”


5 posted on 06/23/2012 6:47:17 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I think Holder has the goods on Obama. Obama is between a rock and a hard place. He can’t afford to diss Holder, and he can’t let those documents be seen, either. He fires Holder, and Holder will spill the beans. Executive privilege is not going to work in this case,you are correct. But they had already got themselves in a corner and he decided to gamble.


6 posted on 06/23/2012 6:48:04 PM PDT by Quickgun (Second Amendment. The only one you can put your hands on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun

Holder could end up having a Ron Brown style accident.


7 posted on 06/23/2012 6:50:05 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun

Right now, if I was reading Career Builder and saw a position of, “Food Taster wanted, salary 1/2 million $ per anum.” And it was anywhere east of the Mississippi? I run like a red-assed ape for the hills!


8 posted on 06/23/2012 6:54:17 PM PDT by donozark (Col. C.Beckwith:I'd rather go down the river with 7 studs than with a hundred shitheads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
The ‘Constitutional Law ‘ professor in the Oval Office apparently does NOT know how the law works for Executive Priviledge.

Hard to believe together they are that stupid.

9 posted on 06/23/2012 6:55:54 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun

Think you are absolutely correct. Zero is either directly complicit in something incriminating or is afraid to throw the AG under the bus for fear of what Holder might reveal.


10 posted on 06/23/2012 6:57:20 PM PDT by MisterArtery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

soetoro was not a law professor, he was a add junk lickturer.


11 posted on 06/23/2012 6:59:08 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1

http://nancyjthorner.wordpress.com/2012/04/11/which-is-it-mr-president-professor-or-senior-lecturer/


12 posted on 06/23/2012 7:02:45 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Fast and Furious is Obama’s Watergate — like Watergate but with 300 dead bodies

Should we call it Obamagate?

Who ever made this decision to push this policy killed 300 lives.


13 posted on 06/23/2012 7:02:55 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

I think it is arrogrance, they don’t think they will be held accountable.


14 posted on 06/23/2012 7:04:39 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

My view? Is that there is a distinct lack of “adult supervision” inside the thinking of this administration.

Think about the “Julia” website as my main example. This was pretty clearly done by a cadre of youngsters who work for 0bama in some capacity and were “turned loose” in order to create the thing. It was flashy, snappy, in terms of execution. But the messaging behind it was unsupervised, it produced an impression that this admin doesn’t really think that individuals can make it on their own, and wants to sell the lifetime government dependency orientation. And this was the impression that even liberals came away with. This is my point, that there was no adult supervision. They were tasked and let loose and came up with a flashy result, and nobody of what we would call maturity sat down with the final version and pondered what the take-away was going to be by just simply chewing on it for 24-48 hours before unleashing it.

And how about the under-30 amnesty deal? Think about it. OK, so on the surface it’s a great thing for the beneficiaries. But forget not that those “kids” are going to have to identify their PARENTS within the application process. The parents don’t have the immunity from deportation. And they are going to have to be declared illegal, or, they will have achieved citizenship sometime AFTER the kid applies...but that is going to be the exception IMHO. After all, if they were citizens, the kid would be citizens, so, the very act of applying for this “amnesty” identifies the parents as illegal! In order to take advantage of the program, the kids are in effect going to have to rat out their parents! They gonna do that?

The 0bama admin comes out with this stuff and my take on it is it’s just not very well thought out. In fact it’s not thought out hardly at all. The slogans are bumper-sticker depth. And frankly, the thinking is, too. It is reflexive and it isn’t well thought out. I don’t think it’s any more complicated than that. Consistent picture?

Same with the F&F executive order. They could not have planned this from the beginning, they thought they could stonewall and obfuscate and get away with the type of misdirection that comes from redacting entire documents until some indefinite time in the future; perhaps after the attention has shifted elsewhere. Yeah, you submitted a document in response to a subpena or a request by Issa, but the whole thing is blacked out! They literally fell into a trap of their own making, now immutably cementing 0bama to the cover-up by asserting excutive privelege. They did not count on a no-let-up pursuit from Issa, which is dumb, because he has proven his relentlessness. But even more ironically, they did not adequately ponder the implication of issuing the executive order. It was done in a hurry, and I’ll bet you $5 they did not realize the consequence that because ONLY the prezzy can issue such an order, it thusly must be he who has the stuff to hide.

I believe this is a consistent theme and characteristic within this admin. Very simply, there is no adult supervision, their stuff is ad hoc, it is simply not well thought out. They are so arrogant, yet so amateurish, they think they can get away with misdirection or changing the subject, or war on women or millionaires and billionaires or social justice, or green jobs, or policemen and teachers, anything to change the topic matter. Just pick the next Alinsky tactic on the list and go with it. That well is running dry.


15 posted on 06/23/2012 7:05:17 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walk into a bar. Bartender says "what'll it be, Mitt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Very good analysis - and I still don’t understand why Obama invoked EP over this. Even if the documents pointed directly to him, with his complicit media he would have been given a free pass and the whole thing would have gone down the memory hole.

And as far as Holder goes, as the author points out, being found in contempt of Congress is meaningless, since there are no penalties. Unless the media cares to whip up anger over it, nothing will happen to the person found in contempt, and the media is certainly not likely to get riled up about Obama’s lackey Holder.

The only thing I can think is that Obama really does see himself as a special kind of President (the dictator kind) and thinks that any challenge to any of his minions is a challenge to him. Being a very thin-skinned dictator, he can’t take any challenge, no matter even if it’s only something that he has built in his own head.

The other possibility is that he is so stupid and inept that he really thinks the power-play is the way to go. Come to think of it, he really is stupid and inept...


16 posted on 06/23/2012 7:07:08 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garjog

if the vote is tuesday [and it better be], nbc will start their newscast with “japs bomb pearl harbor”.


17 posted on 06/23/2012 7:08:20 PM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Obama must have directly approved Fast N Furious...or Holder has got some major compromising photos of Obama beyond being with another woman


18 posted on 06/23/2012 7:11:07 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (When I said "close the borders", I did not mean the bookstore chain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
'Why would Obama do such a dumb thing?'

Because he's incompetent and more ideologue than intellect.

19 posted on 06/23/2012 7:14:45 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Just pick the next Alinsky tactic on the list and go with it. That well is running dry.

Excellent comments! I agree that there's a serious lack of direction in the WH, but I think it's not simply lack of supervision, but stupidity on the part of the folks who think they're pulling the strings.

Obama really does think he's special. He's actually nuts, but nutty people often think they're special.

And everybody who works for him came in with the impression that it was going to be the time for the "ajuste de cuentas," the settling of accounts, with the enemies they had fantasized about destroying since 1968.

Obama is part of the post-1968 generation, but he is somebody who was in a radical leftist time-warp, which is why the nearly 70 yr old Bill Ayers still seems to Obama to be on the cutting edge.

Also, the main problem is that Mr. Choom Gang simply isn't very smart.

20 posted on 06/23/2012 7:15:50 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson